PLASTICS Problems for Mankind are GIGANTIC Now and Getting WORSE

by Diana Gooding on February 15, 2020

Plastic debris and microplastic particles have already polluted the oceans

The Bigger Problem With Plastics, That Is “P L A S T I C S”

From an Article by CAROL ROIG, River Reporter, February 12, 2020

By now, most New Yorkers are aware that a ban on single-use plastic bags will go into effect on Sunday, March 1, 2020. While there has been some criticism of the bill’s numerous exemptions, it’s a good start to reducing the 23 billion single-use bags state residents use each year; that amounts to more than 1,000 per person according to the NYS Department of Environmental Conservation.

Building on the regulatory trend, NY Gov. Andrew Cuomo recently proposed limits on another significant source of plastic pollution: single-use food containers and packing peanuts made from expanded polystyrene, commonly known as Styrofoam.

The full picture of plastic pollution is pretty horrifying, not only because of the sheer volume of plastic we discard every year but also the health impacts of the material’s life cycle. Much of this litter makes its way to the oceans, spoiling beaches and clogging waterways around the world. Whales, fish, birds, turtles and other wildlife die each year after ingesting or becoming entangled in plastic waste.

Plastic never biodegrades—it just keeps breaking down into increasingly smaller pieces called microplastics that absorb a range of chemical pollutants, travel up the food chain to our plates and our drinking water, and accumulate in our bodies.

A new study published in Environmental Science & Technology, the journal of the American Chemical Society, synthesized data from 26 separate studies to calculate that the average American’s annual microplastics consumption ranges from 74,000 to 121,000 particles each year. Americans who drink bottled water for most of their daily intake may be ingesting an additional 90,000 microplastic particles annually. The study’s authors believe these values are likely underestimated.

Plastic & Health, a study published under the auspices of a consortium led by the Center for International Environmental Law (CIEL), provides a comprehensive analysis of the health impacts of the full life cycle of plastics: from the 170-plus chemicals used in fracking to produce fossil fuel feedstocks; through the refining process, exposures to consumers and toxins released as plastic waste is processed and managed; and the long term effects on air, soil, water and human health.

The study documents impacts such as cancer, neurotoxicity, reproductive and developmental problems, immune system impairment, damage to the skin and eyes, and respiratory and gastrointestinal problems, all especially intense for workers in the industry and people who live near plastics facilities.

The climate impact of plastics has received less attention, but CIEL’s companion study, Plastic & Climate, tracks greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from every stage of plastic production, use and disposal, including waste to energy. The report points out that “chemical manufacturing is profoundly energy-intensive, and the production of plastic feedstocks and resins is the most energy-intensive sub-sector of the chemical industry.” The authors estimate that the production and incineration of plastic over the past year alone will add more than 850 million metric tons of GHG to the atmosphere, equal to the emissions from 189 500-megawatt coal power plants.

Given the industry’s plans for expansion, the report estimates that by 2050, GHG emissions from the plastic lifecycle could reach over 56 gigatons. This is equivalent to 10 to 13 percent of the entire remaining carbon budget available if we are to maintain global warming below the below 1.5°C degrees threshold.

The International Energy Agency’s 2018 report, The Future of Petrochemicals, calls this expansion “one of the key ‘blind spots’ in the global energy debate… Petrochemicals are rapidly becoming the largest driver of global oil consumption. They are set to account for more than a third of the growth in oil demand to 2030, and nearly half to 2050. Petrochemicals are also poised to consume an additional 56 billion cubic meters of natural gas by 2030, equivalent to about half of Canada’s total gas consumption today.”

Facing a decline in the use of oil and natural gas for energy generation and transportation because of progress with renewables and electric vehicles, the industry is looking to petrochemicals to perpetuate their profits, and they’ve invested more than $200 billion in the sector over the past decade, according to the American Chemistry Council.

Ethane, a by-product of natural gas, is a plastics feedstock that the industry is particularly keen to exploit, given its plenitude because of the fracking boom. Long centered in Texas and Louisiana, the industry is moving aggressively into the Ohio River corridor to create a plastics hub that will exploit the Marcellus Shale; it’s being hailed as “the new coal.” Royal Dutch Shell’s new polymers plant, under construction near Pittsburgh, is the first of several ethane crackers planned for Pennsylvania, Ohio and West Virginia.

These multi-billion dollar facilities will turn ethane into ethylene and polyethylene pellets, the raw material for most plastics and, according to climate experts, they could also wipe out much of the GHG reduction gains we have achieved in recent years. The US Department of Energy is spearheading $1.9 billion in loan guarantees to develop underground storage of ethane, and Pennsylvania provided roughly $1.65 billion in tax incentives for the Shell facility.

That is the bigger picture. Despite admirable local and state efforts, we are going down the wrong road with plastic production:

1. We need to eliminate single-use plastics and all non-essential plastics throughout the economy.

2. We need to make producers fully responsible for the full life cycle of the material.

3. We should stop making virgin plastic altogether, and invest in innovative recycling technologies to make essential items like medical devices.

4. We should ban incineration of all plastic waste, including waste to energy, because the GHG impact and toxic exposures for host neighborhoods are just too damaging.

5. We should include workers’ health risks in our cost/benefit analyses before awarding giant subsidies to the plastic industry.

We grew up with plastic, but we need to face the environmental damage that comes with throwaway convenience.


See also: How Is Plastic Totally Ruining The Oceans In The Worst Way Possible? From Marine Insight, January 3, 2020

As is commonly known, plastic isn’t biodegradable, which accentuates the threat of lingering waste plastic for years and for generations to come. According to estimates, people around the world throw away almost four million tons of trash every day, of which 12.8% is plastic, polluting land, air and water. While plastic thrown into landfills contaminates the soil and groundwater with harmful chemicals and microorganisms, the effects of marine pollution caused by plastic are immeasurable.

Just like on land, even in the oceanic areas, the effects of plastic on marine life has started to be felt. The studies reveal that around 12.7 million tonnes of plastic waste are washed into the ocean every year. The United Nations Environment Programme estimates there could be as many as 51 trillion microplastic particles in the oceans already.

{ 1 comment… read it below or add one }

Elizabeth Jacob February 16, 2020 at 3:18 pm

RE: Break Free From Plastics Act ……. 2/14/20

You need to know, there’s a global plastic crisis that’s getting worse every day. Today, we have a real chance to help solve it.

Sen. Udall and Rep. Lowenthal, along with allies in both chambers of Congress, just introduced the Break Free From Plastic Pollution Act — which could be the most comprehensive federal legislation yet to address global plastic waste.

This is a big deal. It would address the injustices of plastic production that has long polluted communities of color, and it would put a moratorium on new plastic facilities. Plus, this bill would ban many of the worst single-use plastic products. And it would put the responsibility on plastic producers to cover the costs of waste management and cleanup.

If the Break Free From Plastics Act gains momentum fast enough, this legislation CAN get bipartisan support — we CAN get this passed. But Congress needs to know what side their constituents are on before they’re pressured by the petrochemical industry to oppose the bill.

This bill is the comprehensive solution we need to stop the tide of plastic waste flowing into the environment every day. These are just a few of the ways this legislation would help:

>>> It starts a moratorium on new plastic production facilities — which pollute heavily and are disproportionately placed in communities of color and low-wealth communities.

>>> It forces plastic producers to pay to stop their products’ plastic from ending up in the environment, rather than leaving that burden on the public.

>>> It reduces the demand for plastic by requiring an increasing percentage of recycled plastic in manufactured goods. And it would straight-up ban many single-use plastics from sale and distribution in less than two years.

Plastic producers are already running scared. They’re trying to push Congress to allow them to maintain the status quo. Without enough of us acting right now, they could succeed and actual solutions could be toast.

This bill will only pass if Congress hears that enough of us are demanding it — and now, right after it’s been introduced, is the best time to act. We need everyone who wants a future without rampant plastic pollution in our environment and communities to tell their leaders where they stand.

Elizabeth Jacob, League of Conservation Voters


Leave a Comment

Previous post:

Next post: