John Kerry Explains the Climate Crisis and its Challenges. He Says: VOTE

by admin on October 11, 2018

The climate crisis is now our priority

Living on Earth: John Kerry Looks Back – And Ahead

Former Secretary of State John Kerry is the author of a new bestselling book, called Every Day Is Extra. At its heart is a message of urgency about the need to address the climate crisis. Yet Kerry remains optimistic about the ability of the United States’ democratic system to tackle the most pressing global issues of today. In a conversation with Host Steve Curwood, Kerry discusses his longtime love of the ocean and concerns about ocean health, and says that what America needs now is for citizens to get out and campaign for politicians willing to move the country in the right direction.

Here is the Transcript of the Interview

CURWOOD: It’s Living on Earth. I’m Steve Curwood for October 7, 2018
John Kerry is looking confidently into the future, even as he reflects back on a life in public service, which ranges from being the face of Vietnam Veterans Against the War to a Democratic nominee for President and Secretary of State. Secretary Kerry writes about challenges facing the world, focusing on climate change in the final chapter of his 600-page memoir titled Every Day Is Extra. And even in the face of President Trump’s opposition to climate action, John Kerry remains optimistic. He spent his youthful summers in and on the waters of Buzzards Bay in Massachusetts, which gave him a lifetime attachment to the sea. Over the decades he’s played key roles in legislation and international negotiations on climate change, acid rain, and ocean health. Secretary Kerry, welcome to Living on Earth!

KERRY: Happy to be here. Thank you.

CURWOOD: So, if there’s one thing from your book “Every Day is Extra,” it is your love of the ocean why does the ocean call to you in such a strong way?

KERRY: Well, I’m a son of Massachusetts I think it calls to all of us, sons and daughters. We are blessed to be people of the sea here in the state of Massachusetts and we love Cape Cod, we love the islands, and I learned as a kid. I was raised around Buzzards Bay and I used to just clam and fish and play in the water, learn how to sail, do all these wonderful things. But I learned about under the water, and I then was a big Phillip Cousteau fan and used to tune in. My mother was in the enormous conservationist and environmentalist, and I grew up with a sense of responsibility understanding that the ocean is fragile. It’s not impervious to the things we humans do to it.

CURWOOD: And as I recall from your book, in your fortunate childhood, you were on one of the Elizabeth islands, you were on Naushon.

KERRY: Yeah.

CURWOOD: And then you come out of Woods Hole and you can see it on your way to Martha’s Vineyard if you like. It’s a great place to have your toes in the sand as a kid.

KERRY: Yeah, it’s a gift beyond description, and it was wonderful to be able to be there, but I think that everywhere on our Cape, people would get to experience the beauty of our sand dunes, of our low tides, of the enormous beaches, the remarkable vision that President Kennedy had to keep great Cape Cod seashore national monument. So, we’re very lucky people and our history goes way back. Obviously, I mean everybody during the era of 1700s, 1800s, early 1600s came here on a boat, and we have always had a tie in our history to the sea. In our merchant efforts, the China trade…

CURWOOD: The cod on top of the statehouse.

KERRY: The cod, whaling. And you know we don’t have cod now. I mean, this ought to be a message to everybody. It’s Cape Cod but there are no cod…or very very few and precious few, and it’s a tragedy if we don’t start paying attention to how we manage these kinds of things. We could see an economic impact on our state.

CURWOOD: So, what do we need to do today to take care of our oceans?

KERRY: I think there are three primary challenges: number one climate change, which is caused by greenhouse gases which fall in the ocean and acidify the ocean which has a negative impact on the growth of clams, crustaceans, shells and bleaches out spawning grounds and coral reefs and so forth around the world. We don’t know all the impacts. We know it has an impact. We don’t know the rate of impact. We don’t know where you could have a precipitous catastrophic impact, and so that’s why we owe it particular respect and concern.

The second great impact is pollution, general pollution. People build. They build near the ocean. There’s what we call non-source point pollution. You have runoff, you have gasoline runoff from stations, you have oil runoff, you have pesticide runoff, you have high nitrate runoff which affects the level of oxygen in the water, and therefore the fish and plants and fauna in the ocean, and we have 500 dead zones around the world in the oceans today, dead zones, nothing grows because of what has happened with this overload. And also, pollution generally, effects the fish, you have plastic getting into marine mammals into birds. I’ve seen film of sharks and or porpoises and or whales dragging nets around and dragging plastic around. It’s crazy.

And then finally, we have overfishing. We have too much money chasing too few fish and that’s one of the reasons that we don’t have cod anymore here. Eight of the top fisheries of the world are now overfished, out of the sort of 18 or so fisheries, principal ones, and the others are at or near max. So, with 450 million Chinese who have come out of poverty into the middle class who now have discovered blue tuna and sushi, with 400 million Indians likewise and people around the world gaining in income and therefore appetite, we have a huge challenge, and already about 12 percent protein that people get in the world comes from fish, so there’s a huge demand for fish as a food stock and increasingly we’re going to see pressure on that. So, those are the biggies, but the pollution is just stunning. I mean, if we continue at the rate we’re going, there will be more plastic than fish in the ocean in 20, 30 years.

CURWOOD: Now, of course, you’ve had a storied career most recently as a diplomat. In your background, I think you spent some time in France and Switzerland as a kid, your dad was a diplomat. But when it comes to the ocean you’ve had some special concerns, and I just want to quickly ask you about two. One there’s something called the Law of the Sea Treaty. It was something that the United States and folks from Massachuetts just like Elliot Richardson worked on years ago which we’ve never ratified. And now there’s talk of having some sort of a high seas treaty that would govern…what is half of the world that is not in any jurisdiction.

KERRY: Correct, it’s called the high seas, and the high seas do not belong to any particular nation, but they get egregiously overfished by renegade fishers, pirate fisherman, and years ago Senator Ted Stevens and I went to the United Nations to try to ban the driftnet fishing. We succeeded, it was banned, but today you have pirate fishermen, renegade fishermen, who go out with a draft net and a drift net is literally thousands of miles of monofilament netting that they drop behind the boat, drag along. It kind of strip mines the ocean and as much as two-thirds of the catch, certainly 50 percent, is called waste catch. They just throw it overboard. So, it’s changing the ecology of the ocean by…imagine the vision of you see a strip mine on coal or the land, you see it just ravaging everything around it. This is what a driftnet will do and then sometimes it breaks off and it becomes what we call the ghost net because it just fishes on its own. When it’s weighted down with carcasses, it sinks to the bottom and scavengers clean it off, and it rises to the top again until it gets tangled in a whale or tangled in the propellers of some boat. It’s a scourge and we have no enforcement on those high seas or very little enforcement, I should say, occasionally someone’s military ship goes through it and you can check on who’s who and what’s happening and you can certainly mark what ships are there fishing.

CURWOOD: So, we’re overfishing. Talk to me about the climate and your concerns about climate change.

KERRY: We face a massive challenge of dealing with climate refugees. The prime minister of the Fiji Islands, I just met with him the other day at an event in California where he pointed out that there are literally taking refugees from other islands, and they themselves are now planning how to move, where can they go to be safe. They are going to lose their nation state which is these islands. Increased fires, increased floods, more moisture in the air because of the warming of the ocean, more intensity in the storms because of that moisture we’re seeing it in the hurricanes. We’ve seen last year just three hurricanes – Harvey, Irma and Maria – cost the taxpayer $265 billion dollars, one third of the Defense Department budget for a year. Think of that. Three storms and it’s going to get worse, so people who sit there and say well we can’t afford to do something or we can’t it’s crazy, it is far more expensive to do nothing or to do very little than to actually step up and try to deal with the problem of climate change. And why? Because the answer to the problem of climate change is energy. Energy policy. We have the solutions. Solar today is less expensive than coal, but people are still using coal. We shouldn’t be. We can’t be using coal because it’s the dirtiest fuel there is, and we’ve got to move off of coal on to the alternative renewables. They’re there, and we need the leadership that does it and regrettably this president and his administration and not only not dealing with climate but they’re lifting the restrictions we have on air quality because of automobiles. They’re lifting the restrictions we had on coal dust going into water, into rivers and lakes. They’re putting it back. God knows, I don’t know who the constituency is for this, but that’s what they’re doing. Well…you do know the constituents. It’s coal companies and it’s big corporations and so forth, and we have to fight back against it.

CURWOOD: Your book, which you call “Every Day is Extra” could almost be about the climate itself, that every day we wait to deal with it.

KERRY: Well, it is about the climate. The last chapter of my book, which I’m very partial to, it’s the wrap up chapter, is called protecting the planet, and I deal with my efforts to get the Paris agreement passed. I mean, I went to China, brought the Chinese into the agreement with us because I watched the failure in Copenhagen four years earlier where it fell apart because China was leading the less developed countries in a different direction. China and the United States were able to lead the world to make an agreement, that’s what we have to get back to. Instead of bashing China every day with new sanctions – now there are problems with China’s management of the market – I’m not ignoring that but I think there’s a better way to deal with it than the current administration.

CURWOOD: So, let’s drill down on that. I believe over the years I’ve seen you just about every of the major climate conferences. What inspired you to think that you could find a way to cut a deal with the Chinese? Because between us and the Chinese, what, it’s 40, almost 50 percent of the world’s emissions…

KERRY: Well, sort of just shy of 50. It’s about 45 percent.

CURWOOD: Yeah, so what inspired you to think that there would be a way that you could get them to join us?

KERRY: Because I believe in logic. I believe in common sense, and I believe in the power of persuasion, and I believed that it was in China’s interest. I mean it’s hard to get countries to do things that they never perceive are in their interest, but I thought it was in their interest because I had spent enough time working with lower level Chinese bureaucrats on the subject of climate. I knew what they were thinking and I knew they were hearing from their own constituencies. I mean China is a one-party system, it’s authoritarian, yes, but it’s not immune to citizen opinion, and it’s quite amazing really the way, in fact, it filters up through the mayors and the governors and into the ether of their politics. So, I was hearing from people that Chinese were increasingly upset with the quality of their water. They’re upset with the quality of their air. We were posting the daily air quality on the embassy in Beijing, and people were tuning in like crazy to our embassy to find out what the air quality was, and the Chinese didn’t love it, but we did it. It had an impact, so they wanted to take care of their people. It’s that simple. They really knew, but they did it because politically it’s survival. They knew it was important to their ability to be able to meet the people’s interests, which is basic politics. We haven’t been doing that in America by the way. People’s interests are not being met in our own country, and that’s why our democracy is in trouble. That’s a whole different diversion will go there in this instance.

CURWOOD: Well, but do go there.

KERRY: It has to do with whether we get things done on the environment, whether we hold people accountable to what’s happening now. The fact is that I believe people, individuals and kids here at UMass or at any college in this country are the key to being able to hold politicians accountable. And you can’t do it sitting on your butt pretending somebody else is going to do it or it does not involve you. Everybody has to be involved in this. We have to go out and organize and make a difference. So, why do I say this with such conviction? I’ll tell you why. Because we did it in 1970. In 1970, Rachel Carson had inspired many of us with the Silent Spring”. We had the Woburn waste dump with toxic waste sites, we had a river, the Cuyahoga River in Ohio would light on fire literally, and people said I don’t want to live next to this, I don’t want to get cancer from the water I drink, I don’t want to get emphysema or heart disease from the air quality.

So, we brought 20 million Americans out of their homes on one single day, Earth Day April 22, 1970, and we translated that into a political movement. We targeted the 12 worst votes in the United States Congress House of Representatives. Seven of the 12 lost their seats in the ’72 election. And guess what? Boom, we had the Clean Air Act passed, the Safe Drinking Water, the Marine Mammal Protection, the Coastal Zone Management. The EPA was created and Richard Nixon signed it into law. Why? Because it was a voting issue. That’s what we have to do today folks. There’s no mystery to how we reclaim the direction and future of our country. It’s by going out and working in our democracy, make it work. Last time in 2016 when Trump was elected, 54.2 percent of eligible voters came out to vote, 54.2. When Barack Obama was elected in 2008, it was 62.3 percent. That’s the difference. The story of what we have today is not the people who did vote. It’s people who didn’t vote, and so I’m just saying to you we can change this but we have to do it now because the clock is ticking.

CURWOOD: John Kerry is a former Secretary of State, Candidate for President, a five-term United States Senator for Massachusetts, and his new book is called Every Day is Extra. We’ll have the rest of our conversation with Secretary Kerry next week, and you can find the full interview on our website,

{ 1 comment… read it below or add one }

Common Dreams November 1, 2018 at 1:05 am

Major Cities Declares Climate Emergency —- As UN warns time is running out, Oakland becomes fourth California city working to kick off a Emergency Climate Mobilization

From Common Dreams, October 31, 2018

WASHINGTON – Last night, the city of Oakland followed Berkeley and Richmond, becoming the third California city to declare a Climate Emergency, voting unanimously to pass a “Resolution Endorsing the Declaration of a Climate Emergency and Requesting Regional Collaboration on an Immediate Just Transition and Emergency Mobilization Effort to Restore a Safe Climate.”

Oakland’s vote marks growing regional momentum and a movement of cities to treat global warming as the emergency it is. Oakland joins Berkeley and Richmond in launching an emergency-speed Climate Mobilization and Just Transition effort.

This means that the City will:

>> Rapidly reduce greenhouse gas emissions, and seek to reach zero net emissions at emergency speed
>> Create plans to protect residents, especially frontline communities, from worsening climate disasters, and
>> Work with local cities, counties and public agencies around the San Francisco Bay Area region to bring them into a rapid Just Transition mobilization as well.

The City of Los Angeles is also gearing up for an equitable emergency response to global warming as it considers a motion from LA Councilmember Paul Koretz to create a Climate Emergency Mobilization Department. As Councilmember Koretz wrote in his letter to Oakland City Councilmembers yesterday, “The UN IPCC Report from earlier this month confirms what we have already known: we need to stop messing around with our greenhouse gas emissions immediately or we will face a climate catastrophe, the likes of whose impacts we are already feeling. Severe climate disruption is not happening to our children and grandchildren, it is happening to us right here in California, and around the world in real time. This is an emergency like nothing humankind has ever faced before, and we must be up to the task if civilization is to survive.” Hoboken, New Jersey and Montgomery County, Maryland have also passed similar Climate Emergency Declarations.

Oakland’s Resolution combines the need to stop climate change in its tracks with a commitment to social justice, calling for a rapid Just Transition from an extractive, destructive and racist economy towards equitable, regenerative and local living economies that uphold human rights and the Earth’s life support systems.

Passing Climate Emergency Declarations is a new and growing strategy for the climate movement, and an effective way for cities to act while the Federal government is motivated by fossil-fuel-funded denial. Notes Margaret Klein Salamon, director of The Climate Mobilization: “The growing emergency climate movement calls for an all-hands-on-deck climate mobilization to eliminate emissions as quickly as possible, in ten years or less, through a World War II-scale economic mobilization.” As Oakland Climate Action Coalition (OCAC) Coordinator Colin Cook-Miller said, “If you want to go fast, go alone. If you want to go far, go together. In this time we must go both fast and far, together. Our movement for a rapid Just Transition mobilization must be coordinated, strategic and unified, with leadership from the most-impacted frontline communities who are at the forefront of change.”

Incoming Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez has also called on the United States to treat the climate crisis as it did WWII. What is more, the Extinction Rebellion launched in London today (10/31). This campaign of escalating civil disobedience — backed by more than 100 prominent climate scientists, elected officials and intellectuals — calls for the UK to eliminate emissions by 2025 and remove excess greenhouse gases from the atmosphere through a WWII-scale climate mobilization.

Recent scientific reports have added fuel to the fire of this growing movement. The United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Special Report on Global Warming 1.5C published in October 2018 makes it clear that climate disruption is an existential threat to the survival of humanity. The window for meaningful climate action to hold global warming at 1.5C is until 2030 – 12 years at the most.

As the chair of the IPCC said, “Limiting global warming to 1.5°C would require rapid, far-reaching and unprecedented changes in all aspects of society.” But 1.5°C of warming is far from safe, carrying with it serious risk for triggering a cascade of dangerous tipping points: a recent scientific report “implied that, even if the Paris Accord target of a 1.5°C to 2.0°C rise in temperature is met, we cannot exclude the risk that a cascade of feedbacks could push the Earth System irreversibly onto a ‘Hothouse Earth’ pathway.”

Some climate scientists estimate that we are now facing up to a 3-4°C world, which could condemn us to an uninhabitable planet. As has been witnessed in 2018 in the United States alone, from the historic devastation caused by Hurricanes Michael and Florence on the Eastern seaboard, to the chaos caused by wildfires in California, global warming is already an emergency. The impacts of climate change are being felt most dramatically by the communities on its front lines, such as houseless people, low-income people, people of color, Indigenous people, people with disabilities, undocumented immigrants, elders, youth, queer and trans people.

The OCAC led the effort to pass the Resolution in Oakland, with support from The Climate Mobilization. 42 local & national organizations and coalitions signed on to the OCAC’s letter of support calling on Councilmembers to pass the “Climate Emergency Declaration & Just Transition Resolution” without delay. Notable signatory organizations include Asian Pacific Environmental Network, The East Oakland Collective, The Village, Ella Baker Center for Human Rights, West Side Missionary Baptist Church, West Oakland Environmental Indicators Project, AYPAL Building API Community Power, Kehilla Community Synagogue, California Interfaith Power & Light, 350 East Bay, Sierra Club SF Bay Chapter, Youth vs Apocalypse, Clean Water Action, Sunrise Bay Area, SustainUS, No Coal in Oakland and the Anti Police-Terror Project.

Started in 2009, the OCAC is a cross-sector coalition dedicated to racial and economic justice in leading Oakland’s response to climate change. The OCAC engages Oakland’s frontline residents to create and implement climate solutions that strengthen communities’ health, wealth and resilience. The OCAC’s coalition membership consists of over 3 dozen organizations, including social and environmental justice, environmental, green business and labor groups.

The Climate Mobilization is a national organization grounded in climate truth and justice and devoted to launching an emergency mobilization to restore a safe climate. The Climate Emergency Movement is a network of people doing everything we can to prevent climate and ecological catastrophe. We ask our institutions and communities to respond to climate change and ecological destruction as an emergency. We demand the only response that makes sense: a massive, just mobilization of our cities and nation to protect humanity and the natural world.



Leave a Comment

Previous post:

Next post: