Preserve Craig County VA and the Mountains of VA & WV

by Duane Nichols on July 10, 2017

Preserve Craig, Giles, Nelson Counties, et.al, and all of West Virginia

Information provided by: Preserve Craig of Craig County, VA

Dear Neighbors,

WE ARE ASKING YOU TO SUBMIT A SPECIFIC LEGAL OBJECTION TO THE FOREST SERVICE DRAFT RECORD OF DECISION ABOUT MVP. WE NEED AS MANY SUBMITTED AS POSSIBLE. SEND A COPY TO PRESERVE CRAIG AT PRESERVECRAIG@GMAIL.COM. DOWNLOAD A SAMPLE LETTER AND INSTRUCTIONS. ADD ADDITIONAL OBJECTIONS AND COMMENTS AS YOU WISH.

IT IS IMPORTANT THAT YOU TAKE THIS ACTION IN THE NEXT FEW DAYS! SUBMISSIONS REGARDING THIS OBJECTION SHOULD BE SENT IN BY JULY 17. PLEASE HELP TO PROTECT OUR WATER, FOREST AND MOUNTAINS FROM DEVASTATION BY A PRIVATE COMPANY.

As background, here’s the situation: The review and next steps toward licensing the Mountain Valley Pipeline (MVP) were announced last Friday by both the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) and “our” National Forest.

The FERC decision was not a surprise. The FERC routinely approve all gas pipelines, even though a project of this scale has never been attempted through the fragile and scenic karst of our mountains. Leading experts confirm that it will dramatically harm our water and soil resources as well as the Appalachian Trail (AT). However, the US Forest Service (FS) has changed its procedures and schedule without reasonable notice and issued a Draft Record of Decision that flies in the face of the data we all have been submitting to them for several years. It also overturns the 2002 Forest Service Record of Decision that this area is not an appropriate site for a utility corridor. Craig County has relied upon that decision for decades to build the economic plan, destination-based recreation, and support the social fiber of our community.

Your Preserve Craig leadership team continues to work diligently to preserve and protect our way of life and our beautiful mountains and resources against this and future threats. Our efforts include monthly reports to our Board of Supervisors and providing extensive scientific, regulatory and legal information to the FERC, the Forest Service, the Bureau of Land Management, our legislators, attorneys, local governments, and other organizations about the inaccuracies of the MVP submissions and risks that this project poses.

During July we will need to celebrate the founding of this great country by coming together to again communicate with our representatives and submit important objections to the various agencies involved. Please email preservecraig@gmail.com if you can help raise money, write letters, or share important information with your neighbors.

Here is a summary and links to the current status of MVP:

The US Forest Service intends to amend the Jefferson National Forest Plan to allow MVP construction on very steep slopes (adjoining wilderness), massive erosion, cutting of old growth forests, damage to the AT and viewsheds, increasing invasive species problems, among other things. The surprise Record of Decision can be viewed here.

Page 33 describes how to submit objections within 45 days, no later than August 7, 2017. Preserve Craig will be sending out more information and a sample letter shortly.

Note that the FS is claiming that you have to have already commented (either on FERC record or to FS) since release of the DEIS specifically regarding the Jefferson National Forest and MVP in order to be eligible to object. Preserve Craig objects to this limitation and is currently researching the legality of such a restriction. The Forest Service failed to provide a public comment period, hold any public meetings, or place their proposal on the FERC docket, instead placing a Notice in the Federal Register on June 5, 2017, 82 Fed. Reg. 25761.

For further guidance on the FS claimed objection process see here.

For more FS documents about MVP see here.

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission summary and links:

The FERC issued its Final Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) on June 23, 2017. Within 90 days, the FERC commissions are expected to vote on whether to issue a certificate and what conditions and restrictions may be required. The Commission does not currently have a quorum, pending Senate confirmation of two new nominees.

The file is massive and the 930 page long summary can be found here. If you would like to see the entire FEIS summary with appendices, you can access them here.

VA-DEQ schedule and links

The Virginia Department of Environmental Quality can deny MVP permits under water protection laws regardless of any possible FERC certification.

We are asking the VA-DEQ to thoroughly review and reject MVP’s construction plans under the Clean Water Act Section 401.

>>> VA-DEQ is holding the following hearings:
July 19: Water Control Board hearing in Richmond, VA

>>> Public Hearings About the MVP:
August 8: 801 East Main St., Radford, VA, 5 to 10 PM
To Be Announced: Chatham, VA

>>> Go to this page for an incredible pictorial essay on pipeline building:

https://www.fractracker.org/resources/oil-and-gas-101/pipeline-construction/

{ 1 comment… read it below or add one }

Craig Co. VA July 10, 2017 at 1:04 pm

Visit Craig County Virginia

Craig County is located in the the western portion of the Commonwealth of Virginia, north of the City of Roanoke and the Roanoke Urbanized Area. Craig County is part of the Roanoke Metropolitan Statistical Area. New Castle is the county seat.
The 2007 Population estimate was 5,275 in the 330 square miles comprising the County.

The county is marked by a succession of mountain ridges, running northeast-southwest. The valleys and creeks between the ridges provide for agriculture and population centers.

Nearly two thirds of the county is Jefferson National Forest, Appalachian Trail, and Niday State Park. Rural in nature, it has no stop-lights and is criss-crossed by Virginia Scenic Byways.

Road maps with 911 street names and visitor information became available in August 2013. They were produced by the Craig County Tourism Commission with assistance from Roanoke Valley-Alleghany Regional Commision and Target Marketing, LLC

Reply

Leave a Comment

Previous post:

Next post: