The Shale Boom as Seen from Philadelphia

by Duane Nichols on May 28, 2015

Remodeling the Marcus Hook Industrial Complex

LNG Terminals and the Environmental Unlearning of Philadelphia

From an Article by Michael Silverstein, Earth Island Journal, May 27, 2015

The lure of fossil fuels for America’s fifth largest city

One definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over and expecting a different result. It’s hard not to think of that definition when considering current plans to build Philadelphia’s economic future on making it a major fossil fuel-based energy hub.

Philadelphia has a long history as a fossil fuel based energy hub, and business and political leaders are now hoping to revive that history with a new LNG export terminal.

The insanity factor here is that this history as a fossil fuel-based energy hub brought very painful consequences. The United State’s first oil wells were drilled in Pennsylvania in the 1850s. It was natural that much of the output from these wells would be processed in the state’s largest city. Over the years, even into the 1970s, refineries (there were seven then, five today), petrochemical manufacturers of plastics and other fossil fuel dependent products, along with related infrastructure, proliferated in around Philadelphia.

The cumulative result of all this economic activity was a massive build up of pollution residues. Which was why Forbes magazine in 2011 ranked Philadelphia the country’s most polluted large American city, the “capital of toxicity,” in the magazine’s own trenchant phrase.

Given that history, what could now lead Philadelphia’ business and political leaders to promote a major fossil fuel-based energy hub to reanimate the city’s future economy, a plan leading the press to dub Philadelphia, “the new Houston?” The answer to this question comes down to four words: Marcellus shale natural gas.

Most of the prolific production from Marcellus shale gas wells is now generated in Pennsylvania. The “new Houston” development plan envisions Philadelphia as the a major recipient of this gas, almost all of which now goes elsewhere by pipeline, primarily to processing facilities in the Gulf of Mexico. A proposed LNG (liquefied natural gas) exporting terminal in Philadelphia’s Port Richmond section has in recent months become the focus of much of the debate over this whole energy hub concept.

The environmental objections to this LNG terminal touch upon its possible (and indeed likely) negative effects on local air and water quality. They also include upstream environmental issues, notably the enhanced Marcellus shale fracking that would be necessary to meet the natural gas supply needs of a Philadelphia LNG producer/terminal and the resulting impact on climate change.

The risks to air quality were neatly laid out this March by Matt Walker, the community outreach director with the Clean Air Council, in testimony at a Philadelphia City Council hearing. “A fossil fuel energy hub as it’s currently being envisioned,” he said, will include “liquefied natural gas, oil trains, gas and gas liquids pipelines, and petrochemical manufacturing. Increasing the number of such facilities [including the proposed LNG terminal] would reverse the progress the city has made in cleaning up its air by re-invigorating and ramping up many of the same types of pollution sources as those largely responsible for Philadelphia’s history of poor air quality…. Such a build-up will substantially further degrade Philadelphia’s air quality and have a disproportionate impact on low-income neighborhoods being asked to host such facilities.”

“A fossil fuel energy hub,” he continued, “would also increase the potential risk to public safety should an accident occur.” This last comment has an almost prescient quality. Two months after Walker’s testimony, a horrific Amtrak accident on rails running through Port Richmond (where the LNG facility would be located) killed eight and injured scores.

Tracy Carluccio, deputy director of Delaware River Keepers, pointed out that the proposed LNG terminal would pose risks to shipping on the Delaware River from transport leaks, explosions, and fires. She added, “You also should be looking at the myriad upstream impact problems … [including] cumulative life cycle gas emissions. There are huge lifecycle risks to be considered … but no cradle to grave evaluations on the local and regional environment have been done,” she said.

One very troubling aspect about the LNG terminal debate in Philadelphia, and indeed the whole energy hub debate in the city, is the fact that officials who will ultimately be called upon to make key decisions in this realm don’t seem to be listening to environmentalist arguments very closely. “City Council seems more interested in special interests than taking the public’s interests seriously,” said Carluccio. “There hasn’t been a true opportunity for environmental and community groups to be heard … and when we are heard, we’re given short shift.”

Adding to this view, Walker noted: “Most energy hub hearings at City Council are industry dog and pony shows. Environmentalists routinely get pushed to the end of the hearing agendas…. [They] have only had token opportunities to speak to mostly empty rooms to present their case to City Council.”

Walker opined that much of this may be due to confusion among City Council members about the nature of frack-generated natural gas. “They don’t appreciate that this energy is not ‘green’ energy but fossil fuel-based energy,” he said. An important point, not only when it comes to the proposed LNG terminal in Philadelphia or to the city’s whole energy hub planning, but with respect to the broader future of natural gas as part of the world’s power generating and transportation mix.

Currently, the mid- and long-term future of the city’s LNG export terminal seems dim, not because of many well-founded environmental concerns, but due to economic and competitive factors.

Almost all of the 60-odd large-scale LNG export terminals already in operation or planned and under construction around the world, including 12 in the United States, will likely become operational before a Philadelphia one could do so, co-opting the world LNG market. The pipeline infrastructure to make a Philadelphia LNG export terminal operational does not yet exist, and money to bring it into being is not currently available. And most significant, a similar terminal in Cove Point, Maryland already has the necessary infrastructure in place and government export terminal construction approval.

The Philadelphia facility’s future aside, however, LNG terminals like it are a good focal point when it comes to considering the larger issue of the future of natural gas, like the huge quantities now coming from Pennsylvania’s fracking-dependent Marcellus shale deposits.

Is this fossil fuel destined to win grudging approval from environmentalists, its fracking genesis and methane emissions notwithstanding, because it might be better than coal for electricity generation and better than diesel as a transportation fuel? Or are renewables such as solar, wind and geothermal coming on so quickly for electricity generation and electric transportation models building enough momentum to dispense with natural gas as an intermediary between the fossil fuel energy past and the green energy future?

These are the big questions to ask. Once answered, questions about LNG export terminals like the one now being considered in Philadelphia will find their own answers naturally. And cities planning their economic growth with an emphasis on energy might start looking beyond the kind of futures long peddled by fossil fuel and petrochemical interests.

>>> Read about the Marcus Hook Industrial Complex, receiving natural gas liquids (NGL) via the Mariner East pipeline.

>>> See also:


Greenbrier River Watershed Association

Upcoming Community Meetings

Saturday, May 30 (7 pm) – “In the Hills and Hollows” Documentary Trailer and discussion with filmmaker Keely Kernan. Casasanta 122 North Court Street Lewisburg, WV 24901. The film documents the lives of rural West Virginian communities, steeped in history and heritage, facing an uncertain future as the gas boom transforms their rural community into an industrial zone. For more info contact (Greenbrier County)

Wednesday, May 27 (5:30 pm) – Summers County Residents Against the Pipeline (SCRAP) will hold their regular meeting at the corner Episcopal Church in Hinton (Summers County).

Wednesday, June 3 (7 pm) – Community Meeting about the Mountain Valley Pipeline at the Wallace Volunteer Fire Department Fire Hall, Rt. 20, Wallace, WV 26448. For more information contact Autumn Long 304-796-4677. (Harrison County)

Sunday, June 14 (9am-10pm) - Preserve Monroe Fundraising Concert at Salt Sulphur Springs, WV (Monroe County).

To learn more about communities organized in opposition to the ACP and MVP contact one of these groups:

Preserve Greenbrier County

Summers County Residents Against the Pipeline

Preserve Monroe

Mountain Lakes Preservation Society

Doddridge County Watershed Association

Please call Elise at 304-207-1150 for more information about these community meetings.

Local opposition groups in full swing….

Preserve Monroe has launched an online fundraising tool to raise money for an expanded public awareness campaign. Preserve Monroe Indiegogo.

Preserve Greenbrier County has started an online petition with to protect our precious Greenbier River: Save our longest untamed river, the Greenbrier!

Greenbrier River Watershed Association — First Friday Benefit and Fundraiser for Pipeline Awareness

Please join us at the Wild Bean in Lewisburg Friday June 5 at 8:30 pm for our GRWA Benefit and Fundraiser to raise awareness about the proposed pipelines. We will have live music including local favorite Dave Buhrman as well as The Mojo Sisters. Suggested donation is $7 at the door.

There is still time to submit comments to FERC regarding environmental impacts of the Mountain Valley Pipeline. Click here for more information:

The last day that FERC will receive comments for the MVP is June 16, 2015.

Please call Elise at 304-207-1150 for more information.

To learn more visit:

P.S. We’ve fixed our donation link!

If you appreciate the work we are doing, please consider a donation today.



The Shale Gas Boom as Seen from North Carolina

May 26, 2015

Documentary ‘Fracking Stories’ screened at Cameo Art House From an Article by Andrew Barksdale, Fayetteville Observer, NC, May 25, 2015 A collection of short documentaries describing the dangers of hydraulic fracturing was screened in downtown Fayetteville. The true stories were told by residents in states where oil and natural gas are being extracted from deep [...]

Read the full article →

The Shale Gas Boom as Seen from New England

May 25, 2015

Seven (7) books on “fracking” (horizontal drilling with slick-water high-pressure hydraulic fracturing using silica sand) From an Article by Katharine Whittemore, Boston Globe,  May 23, 2015 Blame — or thank — the volcanoes. Out here in Western Massachusetts, we sit on a geological shelf called the Hartford Basin, which runs from Vermont to the Connecticut [...]

Read the full article →

Benedum Foundation Renews Support of the Center for Sustainable Shale Development (CSSD)

May 24, 2015

Claude Worthington Benedum Foundation Renews Support for CSSD in SW PA & WV Pittsburgh, PA —  4/22/15 (PRNewswire) – The Center for Sustainable Shale Development (CSSD), a collaborative of environmental organizations and energy companies that encourages responsible practices in the development of shale gas resources in the Appalachian region, announced today that the Claude Worthington Benedum [...]

Read the full article →

Frack Waste Injection Wells in Fayette County WV Under Pressure

May 23, 2015

Fayette County  Injection Wells at Lochgelly (WV) Stir Controversy Action Alert Letter of Tom Rhule, Communications Director, WV Mountain Party, May 22, 2015 On May 14th the WV Environmental Quality Board “EQB” decided to allow Danny Webb Construction continue dumping hydro fracking waste at that Fayette County site without a permit. This is alarming. It [...]

Read the full article →

Public Health Complaint Registry Still Needed in Marcellus Shale Region

May 22, 2015

Public health advocates push for Marcellus Shale registry From an Article by Marie Cusik, NPR State Impact (Pennsylvania), May 20, 2015 More than seven years into the drilling boom, health advocates continue to push the state to track drilling-related complaints. Public health advocates continue to urge the state to do a better job of tracking [...]

Read the full article →

Pipelines Galore — Interstate Pipelines to ‘Steal’ from WV

May 21, 2015

Pipeline Construction Continues on 36 and 42 inch diameter long transmission lines From an Article by Casey Junkins, Wheeling Intelligencer, May 19, 2015 Wheeling, WV — At a cost of $1.75 billion, the 36-inch Leach XPress pipeline through the Upper Ohio Valley is the first of $13.5 billion worth of infrastructure projects planned by Columbia [...]

Read the full article →

Atlantic Coast Pipeline Continues to Raise Questions for Dominion Resources

May 20, 2015

Dominion shareholders pepper CEO with questions about the proposed natural gas pipeline From an Article by John Ramsey, Richmond Times-Dispatch, May 7, 2015 Opponents of a 500-mile natural gas pipeline targeted Dominion Resources Inc.’s annual shareholders meeting Wednesday, with more than 100 protesters picketing outside and others who will be affected directly asking the company’s top [...]

Read the full article →

BXE — Beyond Extreme Energy Rally — May 21 to 29

May 19, 2015

BXE New Call To Action — May 21 to May 29th — Be There or Be Square! We are Beyond Extreme Energy, a growing coalition of communities and individuals on the front lines—and taking casualties—in the extreme energy economy. We are the ones demanding to be heard, closing down First Street and getting in the [...]

Read the full article →