Where is the Court taking us?

WV Supreme Court reverses itself on gas royalties of post-production expenses

From an Article by Ken Ward, Jr., Charleston Gazette – Mail, May 26, 2017

In a ruling that was expected by most industry observers, the West Virginia Supreme Court on Friday reversed its own decision from just last year and ruled that natural gas drillers can deduct post-production costs from the royalties paid to certain types of mineral owners.

In the decision, the court ruled 4-1 in favor of EQT Corp. to allow deduction of such expenses — for things like gathering, transporting or treating gas after it is extracted — when checks are sent to a group of mineral royalty owners covered by a state law meant to update and reform decades-old natural gas industry payment practices in West Virginia.

Chief Justice Allen H. Loughry II wrote the 47-page majority opinion, in which he was joined by Justices Menis E. Ketchum II and Beth Walker. Justice Margaret Workman sided with the majority, but wrote a concurring opinion. Justice Robin Jean Davis dissented and reserved the right to issue a dissenting opinion at a later date.

In a new point of law, Loughry’s opinion stated that royalty payments under that state law “may be subject to pro-rata deduction or allocation of all reasonable post-production expenses actually incurred by the lessee.”

It said that oil and gas companies may use “net-back” or “work-back” methods to calculate royalties owed but that the “reasonableness” of those expenses in specific instances may be decided by future court cases.

The court’s reversal of its November 2016 ruling in the case, called Leggett v. EQT Production, comes after last year’s election, in which Walker defeated Justice Brent Benjamin, who had written that earlier court opinion.

Walker’s involvement in the case generated controversy, because her husband had previously owned significant stock in a long list of natural gas and other energy companies that would be affected by the court’s decision. In the new ruling, Workman also went from ruling with what was then a 3-2 majority opposed to allowing post-production costs to being with the majority that was in favor of allowing such deductions.

Last year’s ruling found that West Virginia’s 1982 law to update old “flat-rate” leases requires that companies like EQT not deduct from royalties they pay to mineral owners any expenses for gathering, transporting or treating gas after it is initially extracted from the ground. The court had ruled a decade ago, in a case called “Tawney v. Columbia Natural Resources,” that deducting these sorts of post-production costs from royalties to gas owners was illegal unless doing so was specifically outlined in the lease.

The case decided Friday, brought on behalf of Patrick Leggett and other mineral owners against EQT, focused on whether the same legal requirements from Tawney also applied to drilling operations that work under the 1982 law.

Legislators passed that law to reform what they said was “wholly inadequate compensation” for mineral owners covered by leases that dated back, in many instances, to the turn of the 20th century. Those leases often paid a flat rate, such as $300 a year, regardless of how much gas was being produced and how much profit drillers were making. Basically, the law said that, to put a new well on a site covered by one of those flat-rate leases, the driller had to agree to pay royalties amounting to a one-eighth — 12.5 percent — royalty.

The Leggett case plaintiffs argued — and the previous court ruling agreed — that EQT has been wrongly deducting post-production expenses before paying owners their one-eighth royalty on a tract that had been covered by a 1906 lease that was updated according to the 1982 law.

In Friday’s majority opinion, Loughry wrote that, “Upon rehearing, with all due regard to the previous majority’s consideration of the admittedly complex and subversively entangled issues implicated in this case, we conclude that it did, in fact, misapprehend the applicability of certain common law principles and exceeded its charge in its interpretation of the subject statute.”

Specifically, Loughry wrote that the earlier majority wrongly concluded that the 1982 law contained an ambiguity that needed to be interpreted to “right past wrongs” by prohibiting dilution of royalty payments by post-production costs.

Just before an oral argument in May, attorneys for the royalty owners had sought to stop the rehearing of the case. They argued that Walker should not have taken part in the vote to grant that rehearing and that she should have disqualified herself from any consideration of the issue because her husband, Michael Walker, owned stock in natural gas and energy companies.

Michael Walker loaned his wife’s campaign $525,000 during last year’s election. After information about that motion by the royalty owners was publicized, Walker released an updated decision not to disqualify herself, saying her husband had sold all of his energy stocks.

Friday’s ruling defended the decision to rehear the case.

“While an admittedly uncommon occurrence, rehearing exists expressly for the purpose of ensuring that opinions which are not well-founded due to misapprehension of the issues, the law, or the facts are rectified,” the new ruling said. “Justice demands this procedural remedy, which this Court has judiciously utilized when the issues or outcome demand it.

“When a petition for rehearing compels the Court to conclude that the law may have been misapprehended, neither hubris nor sanctimony should give the Court pause in granting rehearing to correct any such error of law or fact,” it said.

The majority decision and Workman’s concurring opinion acknowledge a difference between the way royalty owners are treated under the court’s rulings in the Leggett and Tawney decisions, and they urge the Legislature to take action to resolve that conflict.

Workman, for example, wrote, “Where the Legislature’s inaction in the face of such significant changes in the industry leaves this Court to intuit its intentions and/or retrofit outdated statutory language to evolving factual scenarios, the will of the people is improperly disregarded.”

Workman also said she wrote a separate opinion to emphasize that the majority decision to allow cost deductions “may not be abuses to the detriment of lessors who are chargeable with pro-rata costs and to urge the Legislature to enact specific protections to assure fairness and reasonableness in the calculation of post-production costs.

“As the majority’s new syllabus point states, only such costs as are reasonable and actually incurred are properly deductible,” Workman wrote. “Accordingly, to the extent that a lessor alleges that cost deductions are artificially inflated or are otherwise not commercially reasonable, he or she may clearly maintain an action against the lessee pending sufficient proof thereof.”

The Leggett case was a major point of discussion during the legislative debate over potential passage of a forced-pooling natural gas bill this session. Various parties were looking for lawmakers to either codify Tawney and the earlier Leggett decision — or to overturn them, depending on which side those parties were on.


Monthly Natural Gas Production 2008 - 2016

Mineral owners seek information about gas well laws

From an Article by David Beard, Morgantown Dominion Post, May 26, 2017

Mineral owners gathered Thursday evening to learn about some potential changes in gas well law that could diminish property rights, and to toss around ideas for action. Most of the talk in the meeting room at the Ramada Inn focused on a state Supreme Court Case called the Leggett Case and an industry-backed Senate bill that may rise from the dead, SB 576.

About 20 people turned out to hear from Tom Susman, representing West Virginians for Property Rights; Tom Huber, vice president of the West Virginia Royalty Owners Association; and Steve Butler, administrator of the West Virginia Farm Bureau.

Leggett Case

In the Leggett case, the Doddridge County plaintiffs sued EQT Corp., alleging it has been wrongly deducting post-production expenses from their royalty checks, amounting to 25-30 percent of their rightful income, since 2010.

Last November, the Supreme Court ruled in favor of the plaintiffs. But on Jan. 1, new Justice Beth Walker replaced Brent Benjamin and the court decided to take up the case again. Rethinking a case is rare, Huber and Susman said, and may indicate the court plans to reverse itself.

The case hinges on state code language mandating royalties be paid on gas extracted “at the wellhead.” As Huber explained, changes in the way gas is sold have clouded the issue. Instead of being sold where it exits the well, gas is now shipped to hubs and sold there. So the court seeks to resolve ambiguity in the meaning of “at the wellhead.”

Huber said that the practice of post-production deductions not only deprives the mineral owner of due income, it can and does lead to negative royalty checks where the company indicates expenses exceed the royalty. The Dominion Post previously wrote about this occurring across the country and described some of the lawsuits that ensued.

“We really feel that this is one of the biggest thefts for royalty owners in the state,” Huber said.

Lewis County mineral owner Tom Kopp further explained to The Dominion Post about his situation. His land has three vertical wells owned by three companies, just a few hundred feet apart. The same amount of gas is produced from each, which gets shipped the same distance. Two companies pay full royalties, but one stopped two years ago, claiming transportation expenses were too high.

When Kopp attempted to dispute the charges, the company threatened to start issuing negative royalties — essentially charging them to take the gas they own.

Huber said that if the court does reverse itself, then mineral owners and their supporters in the Legislature will need to make a full-court press to get some protective legislation pass-ed next session.

“We are at a disadvantage,” he said. “We don’t have the deep pockets. We don’t have the fleets of lawyers.”

WV State Senate Bill 576

SB 576 dealt with two topics. One is cotenancy — owners of a single natural gas tract. It allowed the owners of 75 percent of the royalty interest to consent to a lease, in the face of unconsenting or unlocatable cotenants. This part posed few problems for stakeholders.

The other part did. It dealt with joint development, or forced pooling as some call it. It allowed whole tracts to be pooled into a unit unless a lease specifically forbids it. This gained little support outside of the industry.

The bill passed the Senate, but died in the House. Huber said some fear it may be added to the call of the current special session, or another later this summer. Many agree it will return next January.

Opponents regard joint development as a kind of privatized eminent domain — taking land for commercial gain instead of public benefit.

On the other hand, area gas development companies have been posting Facebook advertisements touting a resurrected version of SB 576 as a way to create jobs and boost the economy.

Butler said that the bill contained no real protections for surface owners. It required compensation, but allowed the owner no say in the location of the well — which could disrupt or destroy the production of a farm.

Huber, Susman and Butlers said they aren’t opposing gas well development. They want fair treatment for royalty owners and surface owners. Susman said this was the fourth meeting they’ve held and they plan more around the state.

They plan to work on a package of bills to protect property owner rights and to develop some educational materials to inform property owners and legislators about the issues and needed legislation.

>  >  >  >  >  >  >  >  >  >  >

West Virginia Top Court Reverses Ruling on Gas Royalties

From the  and WV Public Broadcasting, May 26, 2017

West Virginia’s highest court has reversed its November decision and ruled that natural gas companies can deduct post-production costs from the royalties paid to landowners for mineral rights.

The Supreme Court split 4-1 in its Friday reversal.  At stake is whether landowners or production companies will get more money. West Virginia gas production is starting to boom.

Chief Justice Allen Loughry writes that the court majority now concludes the intent of state legislators and the West Virginia Code language permits deduction “of reasonable post-production expenses actually incurred” by the gas company leasing mineral rights.

The court split 3-2 in its November ruling favoring West Virginia landowners suing EQT Production Co. of Pittsburgh.

A 1982 state law set minimum royalties of 12.5 percent of gas produced at the wellhead.


Chemical Tank Explosion in Barbour County Kills Two Employees Plus One Severely Injured

May 26, 2017

Chemical Safety Board launches probe of fatal Barbour County explosion From an Article by Ken Ward, Jr., Charleston Gazette-Mail, May 25, 2017 Even as President Donald Trump tries to defund the small agency, the U.S. Chemical Safety Board announced Thursday it was sending a team of investigators to Barbour County to look into the explosion [...]

Read the full article →

Trump’s Federal Budget Has Everyone Confused

May 25, 2017

“Trump’s budget a mixed bag for energy sector” From an Article by James Osborne, Houston Chronicle, May 23, 2017 WASHINGTON – From selling off oil in the strategic petroleum reserve to cutting funding for renewable energy research, the Trump administration on Tuesday proposed a new course for financing the nation’s energy sector as it seeks to [...]

Read the full article →

Development of the Rogersville Shale in SW West Virginia is Risky Business

May 24, 2017

Be careful, Cabell and Wayne counties, about shale development in SW WV Letter to the Editor by Bill Hughes, Huntington Herald-Dispatch, April 7, 2017 The fracturing operations of the Marcellus shale gas exploration and production in West Virginia began 10 years ago in Wetzel County, in the Northwestern part of West Virginia. It remains a [...]

Read the full article →

Mountain Valley Pipeline Shows Disrespect for Our Landscape & Our Opinions

May 23, 2017

MVP siting process has ignored our trails, scenic views and public attitudes Commentary by Andrew Downs, Virginia Regional Director for the Appalachian Trail Conservancy, Roanoke Times, May 22, 2017 In less than seven weeks, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission could give the nod to questionable plans Mountain Valley Pipeline has proposed. These plans have been [...]

Read the full article →

Governor of Virginia says “The Threat of Climate Change is Real”

May 22, 2017

McAuliffe: Virginia will regulate carbon emissions; ‘the threat of climate change is real’ From an Article by Robert Zullo, Richmond Times – Dispatch, May 16, 2017 Gov. Terry McAuliffe today directed the Virginia Department of Environmental Quality to begin assembling regulations to reduce carbon emissions from Virginia power plants, a move that was celebrated by [...]

Read the full article →

Wind Energy is Significant and of Growing Importance

May 21, 2017

Wind energy for America in Rational and Recommended Essay by S. Tom Bond, Resident Farmer, Lewis County, WV Wind energy is growing rapidly in many parts of America. It is the least incentivized form of energy, less than 3% of all federal energy incentives, but it is growing by leaps and bounds. A new turbine [...]

Read the full article →

US Industry Seeks Faster Permits, Simpler Rules

May 20, 2017

US Industry Seeks Faster Permits, Simpler Rules From an Article by Reuters News Service, May 18, 2017 U.S. industry groups have told President Donald Trump’s administration that they want two main things from his promised regulatory overhaul: a speedier permit process and simpler environmental rules. Associations representing the drilling, refining, mining, and building industries have [...]

Read the full article →

U.S. Bank Becomes First Major Bank to Stop Financing Pipeline Construction

May 19, 2017

U.S. Bank Becomes First Major Bank to Stop Financing Pipeline Construction From an Article by EcoWatch.com, May 17, 2017 U.S. Bank has become the first major bank in the U.S. to formally exclude gas and oil pipelines from their project financing. This groundbreaking change to their Environmental Responsibility Policy was publicly announced at the annual [...]

Read the full article →