Compressor station to reverse gas flow into Canada

Protests Target a ‘Carbon Bomb’ Linking Two Major Pipelines Outside Boston

From an Article by Phil McKenna, Inside Climate News, Jan. 17, 2020

WEYMOUTH, Massachusetts — After endless public hearings, drawn-out government appeals and fruitless legal proceedings, a band of community and climate activists was left to this: Sitting in the path of a concrete truck at the site where a large natural gas compressor is being built outside Boston.

They were five years on in their bid to block a facility that would play a crucial role in completing a pipeline project that seeks to ship hydraulically fractured gas from Penna. via New Jersey to Canada. The site in Weymouth is near two low-income communities with sizable minority populations already facing high levels of pollution from other fossil fuel infrastructure.

“The Fore River Basin is already toxically overburdened with close to 10 different polluting facilities within a one mile radius,” said Alice Arena, president and executive director of Fore River Residents Against the Compressor Station and a Weymouth resident. “It is highly populated, it is [an] environmental justice [community] and it is unconscionable to be adding another polluting facility.”

According to one estimate by an environmental science professor who was involved in the protest, the compressor and pipeline could enable carbon emissions equivalent to more than one million vehicles per year.

By the time police cleared the site Wednesday morning, nine members of Extinction Rebellion Boston and 350 Mass Action had been arrested for trespassing and disturbing the peace.

The protest occurred just one week after a federal appeals court invalidated a permit for a similar compressor station slated for the historic African American community of Union Hill, Virginia. The court determined that officials in Virginia failed to adequately consider the health and environmental justice concerns of the surrounding residents.

Unlike in Virginia, however, the compressor station in Massachusetts, owned by Calgary-based Enbridge, Inc., is already under construction. “We are committed to proceeding with construction activities and operating the Weymouth Compressor Station with public health and safety as our priority, and in accordance with all applicable regulations and requirements,” Enbridge said in a statement.

In addition to increasing pressure, the compressor stations are designed to act as pressure release valves, venting natural gas into the air if pressure within a pipeline gets too high or if the pipeline requires maintenance.

Enbridge said compressor stations are “designed with continuous monitoring devices along with emergency shutdown systems capable of isolating the station and safely venting the gas very quickly in the unlikely event of an emergency. Since natural gas is lighter than air, natural gas rises and dissipates quickly into the atmosphere.”

High Pressure Compressor Station Under Protest

“I call it a carbon bomb,” said Nathan Phillips, an environmental science professor at Boston University, who participated in Wednesday’s protest. Phillips, who led a pioneering 2013 study on methane emissions from gas infrastructure, calculates that annual greenhouse gas emissions from venting at the Weymouth compressor station alone will be equal to the yearly carbon dioxide emissions of 14,000 automobiles. This amount is dwarfed by the additional emissions associated with gas flowing through the pipeline, emissions that occur when the gas is eventually burned by end users or from leaks elsewhere in the pipeline system.

“If you add up the through-put of the gas, along with the operating emissions [of the Weymouth compressor], it adds up to over a million motor vehicles per year, every year that it would operate,” Phillips said.

The Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection’s air quality plan for the compressor station notes that state climate policy requires agencies to “consider reasonably foreseeable climate change impacts, including additional greenhouse gas emissions,” when issuing permits. The approval plan says carbon dioxide emissions from the high-efficiency gas turbine used to power the compressor will be low, and a required leak detection and repair program will minimize unintended methane leaks from the facility’s pipes. The plan does not, however, calculate greenhouse gas emissions from intentional venting at the facility or the emissions associated with the additional gas flowing through the high-pressure pipelines that the compressor station would enable.

Another concern of the activists involves other toxic chemicals released during venting.

“This compressor station is going to emit benzene and formaldehyde on a daily basis in the course of their operations,” Philip Landrigan, director of the global public health program at Boston College, said in a video last April. “Both of those chemicals cause cancer, both of those cause leukemia and benzene causes lymphoma.”

Modeling conducted as part of the state Department of Environmental Protection’s air quality plan, released in August, showed emissions from the compressor station would include elevated levels of benzene and formaldehyde, but those levels would be within the state’s allowable limits guideline (43 percent of the annual limit for benzene and 70 percent of the annual limit for formaldehyde.) The report notes that the modeling does not take into account preexisting background levels or emissions from unrelated sources.

What makes the Weymouth compressor unusual, and one reason climate activists strongly oppose it, is the key role it would play in linking two existing natural gas pipelines, enabling large volumes of hydraulically fractured gas from the Marcellus shale basin of Pennsylvania to be exported to Canada in a project known as the Atlantic Bridge.

The Weymouth compressor would provide the pumping pressure necessary to connect the Algonquin Gas Transmission pipeline, which carries gas from New Jersey to Massachusetts, and the Maritimes & Northeast pipeline, which has historically shipped gas from Nova Scotia and New Brunswick south to Massachusetts.

The Weymouth compressor would give Enbridge the final pressure boost it needs to reverse the flow of the later pipeline and allow for the shipment of more than 100 million cubic feet per day of fracked gas from the Marcellus shale basin to New Hampshire, Maine and Canada. Its outsized significance as the final piece of the Atlantic Bridge project has been likened to “the last spike needed to connect the two ends of the transcontinental railroad.”

Environmental Justice Communities Border Compressor Site

A report released last February by the Greater Boston chapter of Physicians for Social Responsibility took issue with the siting of the proposed Weymouth compressor station, which would be located on an enclosed, 4-acre facility. It would be “one of the smallest and most densely populated” locations for a compressor station in the country, the report found and posed an “unacceptable health risk for the surrounding community.”

A separate report by the group released in May found the compressor station posed significant risks of fire and explosion. The report noted that the station would compress gas in pipelines under as much as 250 times more pressure than in the 2018 Merrimack Valley pipeline explosions near Boston that killed one individual and left thousands without heat for several months.

Boston College’s Landrigan said the siting of the compressor station in Weymouth also raises issues of environmental justice for the surrounding communities, which he described as among the most economically depressed and “politically powerless” in the region.

The compressor station borders two neighborhoods of Quincy on the opposite shore of the Fore River that the state recognizes as “environmental justice” communities based on the percentage of the population considered minorities and at low income levels. One of the communities, known as Germantown, is primarily Asian with a large public housing building that sits directly across the river from where Enbridge is pouring concrete for its compressor station.

At least eight other existing fossil fuel and industrial facilities are located within a mile of where the compressor station is being built, including a gasoline and oil depot, a chemical plant, two power plants, a sewage pumping station and a hazardous waste transfer and treatment facility, according to the town of Weymouth, which opposes the project.

The state Department of Environmental Protection’s air quality plan notes that state regulations require the agency to make environmental justice (EJ) an “integral consideration in the implementation and enforcement of laws, regulations and policies.” The report adds, however, that because the project does not exceeds state thresholds for air, solid or hazardous waste, “the EJ policy is not applicable.”

Protests will likely involve extended court proceedings

Opponents of the compressor station continue to fight legal challenges against various permits for the compressor project, including the state’s air quality permit. It’s the same type of permit that was recently overturned for the Atlantic Coast Pipeline in Virginia due to health and environmental justice concerns in Union Hill.

“The similarities between what’s happening there [in Union Hill] and what’s happening here are pretty stunning,” Alice Arena for the Fore River Residents said.

{ 0 comments }

North Carolina Attorney General Josh Stein speaks out ...

Some 15 states oppose Trump plan to allow LNG shipments by rail

Article by MARC LEVY, Associated Press, WSAV NBC News 3, January 14, 2020

HARRISBURG, Pa. (AP) — The attorneys general of 15 states said this week that they oppose a Trump administration proposal to allow rail shipments of liquefied natural gas, arguing the trains will share tracks with passenger trains and travel through congested areas.

The protesting states included Pennsylvania and New Jersey, where the Trump administration issued a special permit in December to ship LNG by rail.

The rulemaking by the U.S. Pipeline and Hazardous Material Safety Administration stems from Trump signing an executive order in April that, in addition to seeking to speed up oil and gas pipeline projects, directed the transportation secretary to propose a rule allowing liquefied natural gas to be shipped in approved rail tank cars.

In their 18 pages of comments submitted Monday, the states said the Trump administration’s proposed rule would put residents, first responders and the environment at greater risk of catastrophic accidents. The administration failed to adequately analyze those risks and failed to consider the environmental and climate effects of allowing LNG to be shipped in rail tank cars, the states said.

The flammable and odorless liquid would be transported “through densely populated areas, potentially in unit trains of up to 100 tank cars operated by just one person, on the same rail lines used by high speed passenger trains, with inadequate safety precautions,” the states said.

They asked the pipeline administration to withdraw the proposed rule pending the completion of more safety studies and the development of an environmental impact statement.

Federal hazardous materials regulations allow LNG shipments by truck, but not by rail, except for with a special permit.

In December, the Trump administration issued a special permit to a New Fortress Energy subsidiary to ship LNG by rail from northern Pennsylvania’s Marcellus Shale natural gas fields to a yet-to-be-built storage terminal at a former explosives plant in New Jersey, along the Delaware River near Philadelphia.

From there, the LNG would be exported to foreign markets.

The other objecting states were California, Delaware, Illinois, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, New York, North Carolina, Oregon, Rhode Island, Vermont and Washington, as well as the District of Columbia.

Unit trains are often 100 RR cars long

The pipeline agency’s administrator, Skip Elliott, said when the proposed rules were issued in October that safety is the agency’s “number one priority” and pledged to evaluate all public comments and concerns raised during the rulemaking process.

Monday was the deadline for comments to be filed.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

See also: Massive oil refinery leaks toxic chemical in the middle of Philadelphia on June 21, 2019

{ 0 comments }

Largest Appalachian Natural Gas Producer: EQT Stock Now Junk

January 17, 2020

U.S. Gas Giant EQT Downgraded To Junk Status From an Article by Nick Cunningham, Oil-Price.com, January 14, 2020 The largest natural gas driller in the United States just announced a massive write-down for its assets, offering more evidence that the shale sector faces fundamental problems with profitability. In a regulatory filing on Monday, Pittsburgh-based EQT [...]

Read the full article →

“No PTTG” Rally/ “Plastics” Video/ Panel Speakers on Saturday (1/18/20)

January 16, 2020

CONCERNED OHIO RIVER RESIDENTS — Rally and Public Meeting THIS SATURDAY in Bellaire, OH and Moundsville, WV >> Rally Saturday, January, 18th, 11 am — 12 pm (noon)  >> Meet in lot across from Bellaire Kroger at 26th Street intersection Meet at about 10:45. We will assemble on the sidewalks at the intersection. Bring [...]

Read the full article →

Will the US Congress Give a Political Bail Out to the Atlantic Coast Pipeline?

January 15, 2020

Trying to Forestall Congressional Action — Congressional Relief for the Atlantic Coast Pipeline ? By John McFerrin, The Highland Voice, Page 4, January 2020 As we all learned in school, we have three branches of government: legislative, executive, and judicial. With the Atlantic Coast Pipeline we are now seeing an example of one way that [...]

Read the full article →

PennEast Pipeline Seeks Approvals to Cross Delaware River and New Jersey

January 14, 2020

PennEast, Way Behind Schedule, Asks for Two More Years to Build Pipeline From an Article by Jon Hurdle, New Jersey Spotlight, January 6, 2020 The PennEast Pipeline Company is asking federal regulators for two more years to build its controversial natural gas pipeline through New Jersey and Pennsylvania, saying it has been the victim of [...]

Read the full article →

VA Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) Responsible for Union Hill Mistakes

January 13, 2020

Virginia DEQ’s failure on compressor station review is another sign new leadership is needed From an Article by Vivian Thomson, Virginia Mercury, January 9, 2020 On January 7, 2019, I posed the following question about the Atlantic Coast Pipeline compressor station proposed for Union Hill: “Is an African-American community in rural Virginia the right place [...]

Read the full article →

ACP Union Hill Compressor Station Permit Overturned By Federal Court

January 12, 2020

Federal court overturns Union Hill compressor station permit From an Article by Sarah Vogelsong, Virginia Mercury, January 7, 2020 Calling Virginia’s review of a controversial compressor station in the historic Buckingham County freedmen’s community of Union Hill “arbitrary and capricious,” a federal court on Tuesday stripped the facility of its permit and ordered the State [...]

Read the full article →

Major Oil Companie$ Propose to Come Clean Eventually

January 11, 2020

We Can’t Slow Climate Change Without the Energy Companies From an Article by Ted Halstead — Climate Leadership Council, New York Times, January 10, 2020 There is a real danger that the climate debate is deteriorating into a game of name-calling, with oil and gas companies all too often portrayed as opponents of climate progress. [...]

Read the full article →

Public Concern Mounts Over Low Tax Rate for 2nd Longview Power Plant

January 10, 2020

Green groups protest proposed new Longview Power plants From an Article by David Beard, Morgantown Dominion Post, January 6, 2020 MORGANTOWN — Some members of the green community assembled on the Courthouse Square Monday afternoon to protest the proposed construction of two new Longview Power plants – one gas-fired, one solar. The Mon Valley Clean [...]

Read the full article →