<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Frack Check WV &#187; ponzi scheme</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.frackcheckwv.net/tag/ponzi-scheme/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.frackcheckwv.net</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress site</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Mar 2024 22:41:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>SEC Subpoenas Shale Gas Producers</title>
		<link>https://www.frackcheckwv.net/2011/08/08/sec-subpoenas-shale-gas-producers/</link>
		<comments>https://www.frackcheckwv.net/2011/08/08/sec-subpoenas-shale-gas-producers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Aug 2011 03:33:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nicole Good</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Study]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[natural gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ponzi scheme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[production]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[production Marcellus Shale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[subpoena]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[west virginia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frackcheckwv.net/?p=2709</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Many an eyebrow was raised in June, when Ian Urbina&#8217;s article in the New York Times called into question the economics behind the profitability of shale gas plays.  He went so far as to quote an analyst who called them &#8220;Ponzi schemes.&#8221;  The article was one of his  series on Marcellus Shale gas, covered in [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>Many an eyebrow was raised in June, when <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2011/06/26/us/26gas.html?pagewanted=all" target="_blank">Ian Urbina&#8217;s article</a> in the New York Times called into question the economics behind the profitability of shale gas plays.  He went so far as to quote an analyst who called them &#8220;Ponzi schemes.&#8221;  The article was one of his  series on Marcellus Shale gas, covered in <a href="/2011/03/04/considering-the-evidence-can-the-epa-properly-study-and-police-drilling-for-gas/" target="_blank">previous posts</a>, but this time Urbina&#8217;s journalism sparked a fair amount of <a href="http://fuelfix.com/blog/2011/07/18/new-york-times-responds-to-shale-story-critics/" target="_blank">backlash.</a></p>
<p>The United States government, however, is taking Urbina seriously.  So seriously, in fact,  that the Securities and Exchange Commission <a href="http://fuelfix.com/blog/2011/07/28/is-sec-subpoenaing-shale-operators/" target="_blank">has subpoenaed some shale gas producers</a>.  The SEC&#8217;s investigation will compare actual well production versus predictions, to determine if gas reserves are being estimated correctly&#8211; or if they are being grossly and illegally overstated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://www.frackcheckwv.net/2011/08/08/sec-subpoenas-shale-gas-producers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
