<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Frack Check WV &#187; Wyoming</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.frackcheckwv.net/tag/wyoming/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.frackcheckwv.net</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress site</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Mar 2024 22:41:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Comprehensive Study of Enhanced Oil Recovery with Carbon Dioxide</title>
		<link>https://www.frackcheckwv.net/2021/01/29/comprehensive-study-of-enhanced-oil-recovery-with-carbon-dioxide/</link>
		<comments>https://www.frackcheckwv.net/2021/01/29/comprehensive-study-of-enhanced-oil-recovery-with-carbon-dioxide/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2021 07:04:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Advocacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chemicals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Industry news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Study]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon dioxide]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[enhanced oil recovery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fossil fuels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal affairs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WVU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wyoming]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frackcheckwv.net/?p=36069</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[University of Wyoming &#038; WVU Faculty Members Produce Study with U.S. Energy Association § From the Press Release of Staff, University of Wyoming, December 16, 2020 Professor Tara Righetti, in the University of Wyoming College of Law and School of Energy Resources (SER), and Kris Koski, an SER associate lecturer, co-wrote an energy industry study [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p><div id="attachment_36070" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 98px">
	<a href="/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/9238E9CA-BDF1-4814-B3DF-7233D60F7C7B.jpeg"><img src="/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/9238E9CA-BDF1-4814-B3DF-7233D60F7C7B-98x300.jpg" alt="" title="9238E9CA-BDF1-4814-B3DF-7233D60F7C7B" width="98" height="300" class="size-medium wp-image-36070" /></a>
	<p class="wp-caption-text">Co-authors</p>
</div><strong>University of Wyoming &#038; WVU Faculty Members Produce Study with U.S. Energy Association</strong></p>
<p>§ From the <a href="https://www.uwyo.edu/uw/news/2020/12/uw-school-of-energy-resources-faculty-members-produce-study-with-u.s.-energy-association.html">Press Release of Staff, University of Wyoming</a>, December 16, 2020</p>
<p><strong>Professor Tara Righetti, in the University of Wyoming College of Law and School of Energy Resources (SER), and Kris Koski, an SER associate lecturer, co-wrote an energy industry study with the United States Energy Association (USEA).</strong></p>
<p>The collaborative study is titled “<strong>Study on States’ Policies and Regulations per CO2-EOR-Storage Conventional, ROZ, and EOR in Shale: Permitting, Infrastructure, Incentives, Royalty Owners, Eminent Domain, Mineral-Pore Space, and Storage Lease Issues</strong>.” The <a href="https://usea.org/sites/default/files/event-/Study%20on%20States’%20Policies%20and%20Regulations%20per%20CO2-EOR-Storage%20%281%29.pdf">full report can be found here</a>.</p>
<p>“We are exceedingly proud to have our faculty members at the forefront of a decisive topic in energy development and working proactively to support Wyoming and its economy,” says SER Executive Director Holly Krutka. “This publication is an important step to bridge the gap between our energy research efforts and commercial implementation.”</p>
<p><strong>The report &#8212; in collaboration with West Virginia University colleagues &#8212; is a strong example of faculty research directly supporting Wyoming&#8217;s economy and the energy industry</strong>, Krutka says.</p>
<p><strong>The study evaluates laws, policies and regulations governing CO2-EOR (carbon dioxide-enhanced oil recovery), associated CO2 storage operations, and geologic storage across 12 states and onshore federal lands. The study principally includes two regions: the eastern region, composed of the Illinois Basin and the Marcellus shale region; and the western region, composed of the Permian Basin and Rockies regions.</strong></p>
<p>In anticipation of expanded interest in CO2-EOR as a result of the amended 45Q (carbon capture) tax credit and recently released draft treasury regulations, it is increasingly important for legislatures and policymakers to understand legal and regulatory challenges to more integrated and widespread implementation of CO2 storage, according to the study.</p>
<p>“With the recent expansion of the 45Q tax credit and passage of House Bill 200 requiring carbon capture use and storage retrofits to power plants, we expect increased interest in the legal and regulatory requirements for CO2-EOR and geologic storage,” Righetti says. “This report summarizes and illustrates the comparative completeness of Wyoming&#8217;s regulatory framework as well as identifying opportunities for additional legislative and agency action.”</p>
<p><strong>The project provides comprehensive and comparative analysis of four dimensions of CO2 law, regulation and policy: land use, mineral, water and pore space rights; regulation of CO2-EOR and CO2 pipelines; eminent domain; and geologic CO2 storage and incremental storage regulation.</strong></p>
<p>The study suggests opportunities to harmonize energy policies and address regulatory gaps and inconsistencies. The goal of the study is to facilitate better understanding of the legal underpinnings that frame risk, uncertainty and investment in CO2 use and storage infrastructure and projects; and to provide a roadmap for changes that are conducive to regional project development.</p>
<p>Koski says the report also will benefit private entities seeking to engage in energy development incentives.</p>
<p>“Taking a look at the interstate and federal legal and regulatory landscape is the first step in any potential CO2 enhanced oil recovery or long-term storage project,” Koski says. “This research not only helps identify regulatory gaps that legislatures can tackle to incentivize such development, but it also may be helpful and save substantial time and money for private enterprise in the planning for such projects.”</p>
<p>In addition to the important contributions to the state, the report provides much-needed support to UW students interested in working in the energy sector, according to Koski and Righetti.</p>
<p>“In a transitioning energy economy, with an increased focus on limiting CO2 emissions, potential CO2 injection projects could bring substantial revenue to Wyoming in the form of severance tax and mineral royalties while, at the same time, providing job opportunities for our university&#8217;s Professional Land Management Program students,” Koski says.</p>
<p><strong>Research students at the UW College of Law and West Virginia University College of Law also were involved in the report.</strong> Third-year Wyoming law student Marissa Pridmore, of Limon, Colo., was one of eight law students providing support for the project.</p>
<p>“Working on the USEA project prepared me to work and interact with others in an online, COVID-informed environment,” Pridmore says. “During the project, I also developed an interest in how the energy industry navigates federal regulations, and I have continued to research and write on this area of the law.”</p>
<p><a href="https://usea.org/event/study-states-policies-regulations-co2-eor-storage-conventional-roz-and-eor-shale-permitting">USEA hosted and recorded a webinar Dec. 3</a> for parties interested in summary results of the study. The authors discussed their work and presented possible pathways forward with the information.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://www.frackcheckwv.net/2021/01/29/comprehensive-study-of-enhanced-oil-recovery-with-carbon-dioxide/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Largest Glaciers in the Rocky Mountains are Melting Faster</title>
		<link>https://www.frackcheckwv.net/2017/09/19/the-largest-glaciers-in-the-rocky-mountains-are-melting-faster/</link>
		<comments>https://www.frackcheckwv.net/2017/09/19/the-largest-glaciers-in-the-rocky-mountains-are-melting-faster/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Sep 2017 11:04:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Duane Nichols</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Advocacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EPA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Events]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Study]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dinwoody Glacier]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[global warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[melting glaciers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rocky Mountains]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wind Ridge Range]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wyoming]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frackcheckwv.net/?p=21115</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[SCIENCE &#8212; The Rockies&#8217; largest glaciers are melting with little fanfare From an Article by Benjamin Storrow, E &#038; E News, September 13, 2017 WIND RIVER RANGE, Wyo. — Here at the roof of the Continental Divide, one of the Rocky Mountains&#8217; largest glaciers is in retreat. A new world is emerging in the wake [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p><div id="attachment_21117" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 300px">
	<a href="/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/IMG_0310.jpg"><img src="/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/IMG_0310-300x154.jpg" alt="" title="IMG_0310" width="300" height="154" class="size-medium wp-image-21117" /></a>
	<p class="wp-caption-text">Research on top of the Dinwoody Glacier</p>
</div><strong>SCIENCE &#8212; The Rockies&#8217; largest glaciers are melting with little fanfare</strong></p>
<p>From an <a href="https://www.eenews.net/stories/1060060471">Article by Benjamin Storrow</a>, E &#038; E News, September 13, 2017</p>
<p>WIND RIVER RANGE, Wyo. — Here at the roof of the Continental Divide, one of the Rocky Mountains&#8217; largest glaciers is in retreat.</p>
<p>A new world is emerging in the wake of the receding ice. In a vast, glacially carved basin, where towering spires of granite dominate the skyline, a small colony of stunted Engelmann spruce has taken up residence in a pile of rocky debris, some 500 feet above the tree line. Bees flit among the yellow mountain asters dotting the boulder field at the glacier&#8217;s base. Grass grows along a stream where there was, until recently, only snow and ice.</p>
<p>&#8220;It&#8217;s a different place today,&#8221; Darran Wells, an outdoor education professor at Central Wyoming College, observed from a research camp near the base of the Dinwoody Glacier on a recent evening. A regular visitor to the glacier over the last two decades, Wells offered a succinct take on its evolution over his nightly meal, a dehydrated serving of shepard&#8217;s potato stew with beef.</p>
<p>&#8220;<strong>Every year, more grass, less snow,&#8221; he said</strong>.</p>
<p>The largest concentration of glaciers in the American Rocky Mountains are melting, unseen, in this remote corner of Wyoming. More than 100 glaciers cover about 10,000 acres in the <strong>Wind River Range</strong>, according to a recent study by researchers at Portland State University. No American mountain range outside Alaska and Washington is covered in more ice.</p>
<p>The Wind River glaciers remain some of the least understood ice sheets in North America. Researchers don&#8217;t have a firm grasp on the amount of water locked away in the alpine ice, and estimates of how much they contribute to local streams vary widely.</p>
<p>Answering those questions requires penetrating a rugged wilderness nearly the size of Rhode Island and climbing to elevations between 11,000 feet and 13,800 feet, where the glaciers hug the crest of the <strong>Continental Divide</strong>.</p>
<p>Today, a growing number of scientists are pushing into the backcountry to understand these icy reservoirs. Their concern: The Wind River glaciers are retreating just when Wyoming needs them most.</p>
<p>&#8220;If you haven&#8217;t had proximity to these glaciers, if you haven&#8217;t thought about where water comes from, it would be easy to understate or underestimate the implications of glacial ice loss in a state that has predominantly a semi-desert climate and certainly by contemporary climate models is going to be pretty significantly impacted by climate change,&#8221; said Jacki Klancher, a professor of environmental science at Central Wyoming College.</p>
<p>The Wind River Range cuts a 120-mile path across western Wyoming, rising from the wavelike sand dunes of the Red Desert in the south and terminating amid the rolling forests that ring the entrances to Yellowstone and Grand Teton national parks in the north.</p>
<p>The range encompasses two national forests, three federal wilderness areas and the Wind River Indian Reservation. The mountains are popular among backpackers and climbers, but the lack of roads and the remoteness of this area mean the number of people pale in comparison with the crowds that pack Yellowstone and Grand Teton each summer.</p>
<p>Roughly three-quarters of the glaciers here hug the range&#8217;s eastern slope. That is where the Dinwoody sits, occupying a stark basin capped by the 13,800-foot summit of Gannett Peak, Wyoming&#8217;s tallest mountain.</p>
<p>When Wells first arrived here as a student on a National Outdoor Leadership School course in the late 1990s, the Dinwoody was blanketed in snow. Today, patches of bare ice blot its surface, revealing great twisting crevasses in its face. Each year, the ice climbs a little farther up the mountainside, said Wells.</p>
<p>The retreat hints at the wider challenges Wyoming faces as the climate warms. But, he said, &#8220;I think at this stage there is still a lot of denial, right. People don&#8217;t want to admit it&#8217;s a possibility because it&#8217;s not a pretty picture.&#8221; In 1950, when researchers first measured the Dinwoody, they calculated its area at 850 acres. A follow-up study 50 years later concluded it was 540 acres.</p>
<p>The decline mirrors many glaciers in the range. One study in 2011 using aerial photographs concluded that many of the glaciers in Wind River lost on average 38 percent of their surface area over the latter half of the 20th century.</p>
<p>Glaciologists predict <strong>Glacier National Park</strong> will lose its ice sheets by 2080. The glaciers of the Cascades, the largest in the contiguous United States, are expected to hang on until roughly 2100. But there are few predictions for the future of the Dinwoody and its close neighbors.</p>
<p>Relatively few teams have tested the depth of the ice or examined other factors that could contribute to its demise. Both are essential to developing a prediction for how long the Dinwoody will last. It is this question Central Wyoming College researchers hope to answer.</p>
<p>In late August, Klancher and Wells led a team of roughly 15 undergraduates and researchers from Central Wyoming College, the University of Wyoming and the University of Redlands on their fourth summer expedition to the Dinwoody.</p>
<p>The trip, officially the <strong>Interdisciplinary Climate Change Expedition</strong>, is made possible by a five-year research permit from the <strong>U.S. Forest Service</strong>, which oversees this wilderness.</p>
<p>The wilderness designation means the glacier is inaccessible by helicopter or car. To reach it, the team loaded nine mules with 900 pounds of food, camping supplies, one ground-penetrating radar (the Noggin 100 MHz) — along with its batteries, cables, antenna and monitor — an incubator for snow samples, solar-powered batteries, test tubes, flow meters and other scientific instruments.</p>
<p>The 20-mile trip took more than two days, leading mules, professors and students 3,000 feet up and over a high alpine plateau and down several thousand feet into a valley, where they slowly weaved their way along a river in the direction of a boulder field until they finally reached the glacier&#8217;s base. From there, backpacks replaced mules, and equipment was hauled the last 2 miles over the rocks to a high-altitude research camp at roughly 11,000 feet.</p>
<p>Each morning, teams departed for the glacier, ice axes in hand and crampons strapped to their feet. One group dragged ground-penetrating radar across the ice, bouncing sonar off the bedrock below to test its depth. Another flew a kite equipped with a GoPro camera to snap images of its surface, needed to create a 3-D model of the glacier because drones are not allowed in federal wilderness areas. Still another took snow samples to measure black carbon, a component of particulate matter that absorbs sunlight and can speed glacial melt.</p>
<p>After the expedition, researchers will use ArcGIS, a geospatial software program, to map the glacier and compare the data with previous years.</p>
<p>&#8220;A lot of the water to irrigate fields for cattle comes from these glaciers and famous snowfields,&#8221; said Adam Frank, one of the Central Wyoming College students who helped measure the ice&#8217;s depths. &#8220;It&#8217;s not just trying to prove climate change is affecting the Wind River Range and the glaciers in it, but trying to get tangible data that we can use to show things are changing and changing quickly.&#8221;</p>
<p>His classmate, Marten Baur, framed the research in more personal terms. A year earlier, Baur, a 22-year-old, hiked to the glacier and was struck by the beauty of the ice sheet and surrounding mountains. He resolved to join this year&#8217;s research expedition.</p>
<p>&#8220;Realizing my kids further on might not be able to experience this, they may not be able to strap on their crampons and ice axes and roam around on the ice fields — that&#8217;s significant,&#8221; he said.</p>
<p>The glacier is transformed in late afternoon. Puddles of slush emerge out of solid ice near its base. A spiderweb of small rivers form, cutting channels in the ice and spilling into a series of glacial tarns at the mouth of the basin. The water continues downward, gaining power as it winds through the boulder field, before plunging into a river valley where it combines with runoff from the nearby Gannett Glacier to form Dinwoody Creek.</p>
<p>The creek cuts its way through a deep valley, arriving at Dinwoody Lake on the Wind River Indian Reservation, where it finally dumps into the Wind River, a major tributary of the Yellowstone River.</p>
<p>Like much of the West, the vast majority of the water here is used for irrigation, sustaining the hay and alfalfa needed to see Wyoming&#8217;s cattle herds through harsh winters. And like much of the West, most of that water comes from the snow that blankets Wyoming&#8217;s mountains in the winter and melts in the spring.<br />
Glaciers contribute a relatively small amount of water by comparison, but they do play a stabilizing role by serving as a savings bank of sorts for the state&#8217;s water needs.</p>
<p>In late summer, when the last of the winter snow has melted, glacial runoff sustains the streams flowing off the Wind River. The glaciers&#8217; importance only grows during drought, which climate scientists expect to be more frequent and severe in coming years.</p>
<p>One 2012 study estimated that late summer glacial contributions accounted for 23 percent to 54 percent of stream flow in several local watersheds. It also found that glaciated basins experienced less variability in stream flow than those without glaciers.</p>
<p>&#8220;There is a run on the savings bank. We&#8217;re not collecting interest anymore,&#8221; Klancher said. &#8220;We are dipping into the savings, and the interest we counted on for June, July, August, those hot summer months, is in great jeopardy.&#8221;</p>
<p>Federal officials are increasingly concerned by the glaciers&#8217; disappearance. Forest Service officials recently began a study of the Mammoth Glacier, on the western slope, and have signed off on a field study by researchers at the University of North Dakota.</p>
<p>Officials at the Bureau of Land Management&#8217;s Lander field office have taken interest in Central Wyoming College&#8217;s research because it will help the bureau plan for an increasingly arid climate, said Kristin Yannone, the office&#8217;s planning and environment coordinator.</p>
<p>&#8220;The information we&#8217;re seeing is the glacier is changing, not in glacial terms but in immediate terms,&#8221; she said. The Wind River Range is the headwaters of tributaries feeding the Colorado, Missouri and Snake rivers, glaciologists say the ice sheets&#8217; contributions to those basins are relatively small. Their disappearance is unlikely to make a material change in downstream water flows.</p>
<p><strong>The Wind River glaciers are nevertheless harbingers of change</strong>. Glaciers across the West have been melting ever since the end of the Little Ice Age, a cool period in the Earth&#8217;s history that ended around the close of the 19th century.</p>
<p>But their decline appears to have accelerated in recent years. The Continental Glacier, one of the slower melting glaciers in the range, melted 1.6 times faster between 1999 and 2012 than the previous 30 years, according to University of North Dakota glaciologist Jeff VanLooy, who is conducting field studies of several Wind River glaciers.</p>
<p>The <strong>Knife Point Glacier</strong>, one of the range&#8217;s fastest retreating ice sheets, melted three times faster between 1999 and 2015 than it did between 1966 and 1999.</p>
<p>Central Wyoming College&#8217;s initial research show the Dinwoody sheds 1.3 meters of ice annually between 2006 and 2016. The ice sheet now measures as little as 2 meters at its shallowest and roughly 55 meters at its deepest.</p>
<p>&#8220;We&#8217;re not going to stop these glaciers from melting. They are going to melt,&#8221; VanLooy said. &#8220;It does mean we need to make adaptions to what we do in terms of water management. Agriculture and ranching are big to Wyoming. The economy may end up hurting in the future because of a lack of preparedness.&#8221;</p>
<p>Back at the base of the Dinwoody, Wells wondered what his students would take from the trip. Maybe they will be inspired by the beauty of this place. Maybe some will want to pursue a career in science as a result. And maybe a few will continue to study these glaciers, helping people in the semi-arid basins below prepare for the icy retreat.</p>
<p><strong>But, time is of the essence.  Because, this laboratory is disappearing.</strong></p>
<p>Sent from my iPhone</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://www.frackcheckwv.net/2017/09/19/the-largest-glaciers-in-the-rocky-mountains-are-melting-faster/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>USGS Report Details How Natural Gas Extraction Destroys Forests</title>
		<link>https://www.frackcheckwv.net/2012/10/16/usgs-report-details-how-natural-gas-extraction-destroys-forests/</link>
		<comments>https://www.frackcheckwv.net/2012/10/16/usgs-report-details-how-natural-gas-extraction-destroys-forests/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2012 13:41:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Duane Nichols</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drilling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Forests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fracking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[land disturbances]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marcellus shale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[natural gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pennsylvania]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pipelines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Roads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USGS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wellpads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wyoming]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frackcheckwv.net/?p=6436</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[US Geological Survey Bradford &#38; Washington Counties in PA A new analysis from the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) of two counties in Pennsylvania found that natural gas extraction creates “potentially serious patterns of disturbance on the landscape.” Wellpads, roads, pipelines and waste pits are clearcuts in forests. Cumulatively they are very destructive to the natural ecosystem. According to the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><div class="mceTemp">
<dl id="attachment_6437" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 310px;">
<dt class="wp-caption-dt"><a href="/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/U-S-Geological-Survey-green.jpg"><img class="size-medium wp-image-6437" title="U S Geological Survey green" src="/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/U-S-Geological-Survey-green-300x123.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="123" /></a></dt>
<dd class="wp-caption-dd">US Geological Survey</dd>
</dl>
<p><strong>Bradford &amp; Washington Counties in PA</strong></p>
<p>A <a title="http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2012/1154/of2012-1154.pdf" href="http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2012/1154/of2012-1154.pdf" target="_blank">new analysis </a>from the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) of two counties in Pennsylvania found that natural gas extraction creates “potentially serious patterns of disturbance on the landscape.” Wellpads, roads, pipelines and waste pits are clearcuts in forests. Cumulatively they are very <a title="http://ecowatch.org/2012/grassroots-activism-the-core-of-the-environmental-movement/" href="http://ecowatch.org/2012/grassroots-activism-the-core-of-the-environmental-movement/" target="_blank">destructive to the natural ecosystem</a>.</p>
<p><a title="USGS reports says drilling &amp; fracking destroys forests" href="http://ecowatch.org/2012/natural-gas-destroys-forests/" target="_blank">According to the USGS</a>:</p>
<p>“Changes in land use and land cover affect the ability of ecosystems to provide essential ecological goods and services, which, in turn, affect the economic, public health and social benefits that these ecosystems provide.” Habitat fragmentation decreases a forest’s “abilty to support viable populations of individual species.”</p>
<p>The bottom line for the USGS: “Agricultural and forested areas are being converted to natural gas extraction disturbance” and the effect is “substantial.” Sadly, Pennsylvania is not the only place where wildlife habitat is being destroyed by oil and gas production; another example is in Wyoming where gas wells are spaced in patterns across the landscape.</p>
<p>You can find all the <a title="http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2012/1154/of2012-1154.pdf" href="http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2012/1154/of2012-1154.pdf" target="_blank">data and analysis in the USGS paper on line</a>, but to see what the data means in real life, photos are worth a thousand words.  A <a title="Photo of well pads in McKean County in Pennsylvania" href="http://ecowatch.org/2012/natural-gas-destroys-forests/" target="_blank">photo in the original article</a> is entitled: ”Landscape consequences of natural gas extraction in Bradford and Washington Counties, Pennsylvania, 2004–2010: U.S. Geological Survey.”</p>
<p> &gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;</p>
<h3>Local governments get most of Marcellus shale impact fee distributions from 2011</h3>
<p>The Public Utility Commission of Pennsylvania <a title="PA PUC says local governments get much of impact fees" href="http://www.pennlive.com/midstate/index.ssf/2012/10/local_governments_get_majority.html">(PUC) announced today</a> exactly where the money from the Marcellus shale impact fee system was going. Under the new Article 13 law, the majority of the money &#8211; more than $110 million of the $204 million collected &#8211; goes to counties and local governments.</p>
<p>High-producing gas boom counties were predictably the big winners with Bradford County and its municipalities receiving a total of $8.4 million. Bradford was followed by Tioga County and its municipalities with $4.8 million, Washington County and its municipalities with $4.4 million, Lycoming County and its municipalities with $4 million and Susquehanna County and its municipalities with $3.9 million.</p>
<p>[It is clear to me that orders of magnitute more damages were done in each of these counties than is compensated by these fees, if that is important to anyone.   DGN]</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://www.frackcheckwv.net/2012/10/16/usgs-report-details-how-natural-gas-extraction-destroys-forests/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fracking Contamination &#8216;Will Get Worse&#8217;</title>
		<link>https://www.frackcheckwv.net/2011/12/21/fracking-contamination-will-get-worse/</link>
		<comments>https://www.frackcheckwv.net/2011/12/21/fracking-contamination-will-get-worse/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2011 19:14:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Duane Nichols</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contamination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drilling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EnCarta Oil and Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fracking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marcellus shale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[organic chemicals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pavillion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[water]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wyoming]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frackcheckwv.net/?p=3745</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An expert in tracking leaking methane from oil and gas wells says a groundbreaking U.S. federal study on hydraulic fracturing highlights not only an old and growing problem, but the need for tighter regulations in the shale gas industry. &#8220;The shale gas boom combined with hydraulic fracking will cause wellbores to leak more often than [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p><a href="/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/Tyree-photo.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-3746" title="Tyree-photo" src="/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/Tyree-photo-150x150.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="150" /></a></p>
<p>An <a title="Expert Says Fracking Pollution to Get Worse" href="http://thetyee.ca/News/2011/12/19/Fracking-Contamination/">expert in tracking leaking methane</a> from oil and gas wells says a groundbreaking U.S. federal study on hydraulic fracturing highlights not only an old and growing problem, but the need for tighter regulations in the shale gas industry.</p>
<p>&#8220;The shale gas boom combined with hydraulic fracking will cause wellbores to leak more often than run-of-the-mill conventional wells,&#8221; says Karlis Muehlenbachs, a geochemist at the University of Alberta. &#8220;The problem is going to get worse, not better.&#8221;</p>
<p>EPA&#8217;s recent report on Pavillion, Wyoming, concluded that:  &#8221;Surface casing of gas production wells do not extend below the maximum depth of domestic wells in the area of investigation.&#8221; That means methane, which is lighter than air, could leak or migrate up the wellbore towards shallower domestic water wells.</p>
<p>Muehlenbachs, said that they&#8217;ll frack each well up to 20 times. “Each time the pressure will shudder and bang the pipes in the wellbore. The cement is hard and the steel is soft. If you do it all the time you are going to break bonds and cause leaks. It&#8217;s a real major issue.&#8221;</p>
<p>However, according to EnCarta Oil and Gas, the chemicals that EPA found in test wells drilled to understand drinking water problems near Pavillion, Wyoming, were not used in hydraulic fracturing.  The explanation of EnCarta is given in this <a title="EnCarta Can Explain Source(s) of Contamination" href="http://www.statejournal.com/story/16363310/encana-epas-connection-of-fracking-water-contamination-flawed" target="_blank">recent news article</a>. The company will be providing more details about the chemicals in question in comments on the draft report during the 45-day comment period that ends January 27, 2012.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://www.frackcheckwv.net/2011/12/21/fracking-contamination-will-get-worse/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How&#8217;s this for an Example of Groundwater Contamination?</title>
		<link>https://www.frackcheckwv.net/2011/12/09/hows-this-for-an-example-of-groundwater-contamination/</link>
		<comments>https://www.frackcheckwv.net/2011/12/09/hows-this-for-an-example-of-groundwater-contamination/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2011 18:31:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nicole Good</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Study]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contamination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[epa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fracking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[groundwater]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pavillion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pollution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wyoming]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frackcheckwv.net/?p=3681</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[According to an article in the USA Today, the EPA announced yesterday that groundwater beneath the town of Pavillion, WY, was polluted with compounds associated with fracking chemicals.  Residents complain that the water reeks of chemicals, and were advised last year not to drink the water after it was found to contain hydrocarbons. Peer reviewed studies of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>According to<a href="http://www.usatoday.com/money/industries/energy/environment/story/2011-12-08/epa-fracking-pollution/51745004/1" target="_blank"> an article in the USA Today</a>, the EPA announced yesterday that groundwater beneath the town of Pavillion, WY, was polluted with compounds associated with fracking chemicals.  Residents complain that the water reeks of chemicals, and were advised last year not to drink the water after it was found to contain hydrocarbons.</p>
<p>Peer reviewed studies of the issue still need completed, and it should be noted that the unique geology underlying Pavillion is suspected of contributing to the cause of the pollution.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://www.frackcheckwv.net/2011/12/09/hows-this-for-an-example-of-groundwater-contamination/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
