<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Frack Check WV &#187; stream violations</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.frackcheckwv.net/tag/stream-violations/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.frackcheckwv.net</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress site</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Mar 2024 22:41:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Rover Pipeline Should Be Fully Responsible for Stream Impacts</title>
		<link>https://www.frackcheckwv.net/2018/07/12/rover-pipeline-should-be-fully-responsible-for-stream-impacts/</link>
		<comments>https://www.frackcheckwv.net/2018/07/12/rover-pipeline-should-be-fully-responsible-for-stream-impacts/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2018 14:10:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Accidents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Advocacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chemicals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DEP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Events]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Industry news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Study]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Middle Island Creek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rover Pipeline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stream violations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[water pollution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WV-DEP]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frackcheckwv.net/?p=24418</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hold Rover Pipeline Accountable for Water Pollution &#8211; Act by 7/13/18 Update from West Virginia Rivers Coalition, July 12, 2018 RE: Doddridge, Tyler and Wetzel Counties including Under the Ohio River The Rover Pipeline in northern West Virginia has a long history of negligence – 18 water quality violations and two cease and desist orders [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p><div id="attachment_24419" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 300px">
	<a href="/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/BB1417F2-0CC2-4479-9579-128F59663A90.jpeg"><img src="/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/BB1417F2-0CC2-4479-9579-128F59663A90-300x225.jpg" alt="" title="BB1417F2-0CC2-4479-9579-128F59663A90" width="300" height="225" class="size-medium wp-image-24419" /></a>
	<p class="wp-caption-text">Stream contamination entering Meathouse Fork of Middle Island Creek</p>
</div><strong>Hold Rover Pipeline Accountable for Water Pollution &#8211; Act by 7/13/18</strong></p>
<p>Update from West Virginia Rivers Coalition, July 12, 2018</p>
<p>RE: Doddridge, Tyler and Wetzel Counties including Under the Ohio River</p>
<p>The Rover Pipeline in northern West Virginia has a long history of negligence – 18 water quality violations and two cease and desist orders since April 2017. You may have <a href="http://wvpublic.org/post/rover-pipeline-fined-water-pollution-violations">read in the news</a> that WVDEP has issued Rover a penalty of $430,000 for 14 of those violations. The proposed agreement to that penalty is now open for public comment.</p>
<p>While WV Rivers commends WVDEP for holding Rover accountable for their water quality violations, we request the penalty be adjusted in a way that fully considers Rover’s repeated negligence and disrespect of environmental law, and strongly deters other pipeline companies from following suit. View our <a href="http://wvrivers.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/roverletter.pdf">letter to WVDEP here</a>.</p>
<p>Over the last year, Rover’s erosion impacted 35 streams and created unlawful water quality conditions approximately 92 times. $430,000 doesn’t cover the costs to reclaim the damage they’ve inflicted on West Virginia’s streams and the local residents who depend on them. Nor does it match in scale a penalty for a project with a construction budget of $4.2 billion. That’s why we are requesting WVDEP reconsider Rover’s penalties and deny them any future projects.</p>
<p>Add your voice! Share with WVDEP that you want them to hold Rover Pipeline accountable for their water pollution. <a href="http://salsa4.salsalabs.com/o/51680/images/21646/-3">Send a letter</a> before 5PM, Friday, July 13. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://www.frackcheckwv.net/2018/07/12/rover-pipeline-should-be-fully-responsible-for-stream-impacts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
