<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Frack Check WV &#187; sink holes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.frackcheckwv.net/tag/sink-holes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.frackcheckwv.net</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress site</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Mar 2024 22:41:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Mariner East Pipeline is Unsafe &amp; Must be Rerouted in Penna.</title>
		<link>https://www.frackcheckwv.net/2020/12/28/mariner-east-pipeline-is-unsafe-must-be-rerouted-in-penna/</link>
		<comments>https://www.frackcheckwv.net/2020/12/28/mariner-east-pipeline-is-unsafe-must-be-rerouted-in-penna/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2020 07:06:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Duane Nichols</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Accidents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Advocacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chemicals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DEP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Events]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Industry news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2X]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[explosions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fires]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mariner East]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pipelines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[safety risk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sink holes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frackcheckwv.net/?p=35677</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[YEAR IN REVIEW: Sunoco told to reroute pipeline in Chester County PA From the Daily Local News, Chester County, PA, December 23, 2020 Following an August spill of drilling fluid at Marsh Creek Lake, the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection shut down construction and told pipeline builder Sunoco/Energy Transfer to find alternative route. Sunoco appealed [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p><div id="attachment_35680" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 300px">
	<a href="/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/B5F46F18-FE65-40E7-9EE2-DD39BCC82D53.jpeg"><img src="/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/B5F46F18-FE65-40E7-9EE2-DD39BCC82D53-300x168.jpg" alt="" title="B5F46F18-FE65-40E7-9EE2-DD39BCC82D53" width="300" height="168" class="size-medium wp-image-35680" /></a>
	<p class="wp-caption-text">High pressure pipelines in residential areas are clearly a safety issue</p>
</div><strong>YEAR IN REVIEW: Sunoco told to reroute pipeline in Chester County PA</strong></p>
<p>From the <a href="https://www.dailylocal.com/news/local/year-in-review-sunoco-told-to-reroute-pipeline-in-chester-county/article_13ee8b4c-4558-11eb-9c63-bfa20ecec2af.html">Daily Local News, Chester County, PA</a>, December 23, 2020</p>
<p>Following an August spill of drilling fluid at Marsh Creek Lake, the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection shut down construction and told pipeline builder Sunoco/Energy Transfer to find alternative route.</p>
<p>Sunoco appealed the ruling and Judge Bernard Labuskes Jr. ruled that the PA-DEP should be tasked with making any final decision on a restart at the site that feeds drinking water to residents and businesses to the south along the Brandywine Creek watershed.</p>
<p>The PA-DEP also required Sunoco/ET to restore resources impacted by Mariner East 2 pipeline installation in Upper Uwchlan Township.</p>
<p>The August spill of over 8,000 gallons of drilling fluid, an industrial waste, created a 15-foot wide by 8-foot deep subsidence, adversely impacting wetlands, two tributaries to Marsh Creek Lake, and the lake itself, in Marsh Creek State Park.</p>
<p>The drilling fluid spill caused the park to close off 33 acres of the lake from boating and other recreational uses and access.</p>
<p><strong>Two new subsidences, or sinkholes recently developed in the vicinity of the active 8 inch Mariner pipeline</strong>. One sinkhole measures 6 by 9, by 4 feet deep, and the other is 9 feet around and 11 feet deep. The active pipe is about four feet deep.</p>
<p><strong>The Mariner East pipeline right-of-way weaves 350 miles from Marcellus shale deposits in Western Pennsylvania, Ohio and West Virginia to the refinery in Marcus Hook, Delaware County.</strong> The pipe passes by more than 40 schools statewide, the Chester County Library in Exton, through a children’s baseball field and high density areas in both Chester and Delaware counties.</p>
<p><strong>“These incidents are yet another instance where Sunoco has blatantly disregarded the citizens and resources of Chester County with careless actions while installing the Mariner East 2 Pipeline,” PA-DEP Secretary Patrick McDonnell said. “We will not stand for more of the same.</strong></p>
<p>“An alternate route must be used. The department is holding Sunoco responsible for its unlawful actions and demanding a proper cleanup,” McDonnell said. “To the fullest extent possible under our laws and regulations, we will continue to hold this company accountable for their actions, impacts, and behavior.”</p>
<p><strong>In the Notice of Violation</strong>, PA-DEP requested, among other things, that Sunoco provide plans to address the impacts of the drilling fluid spill and subsidence events.</p>
<p>PA-DEP reported that a pipeline reroute in the Marsh Creek area was previously evaluated by Sunoco and found to be technically feasible. The order requires that this technically feasible route be used rather than the current pathway, which has resulted in multiple drilling fluid spills and subsidence in a wetland area.</p>
<p><strong>Former State Sen. Andy Dinniman, D-19 of West Whiteland fought the project for several years and recently at Marsh Creek announced for the first time that the project should be discontinued.</strong></p>
<p>“While it’s good to see that PA-DEP taking responsibility for the ongoing and very severe impacts of the Mariner East pipeline project, I hope it will also reconsider and rethink the pipeline route and construction activities that have led to a series of sinkholes and other serious geologic problems along karst formations in the West Whiteland area,” Dinniman said.</p>
<p><strong>State Rep. Carolyn Comitta, D-156th of West Chester, has organized several informational pipeline events.</strong></p>
<p>“I applaud the PA-DEP order to reroute the Sunoco pipeline in Upper Uwchlan Township,” Comitta said. “We’ve seen the continuous violations by Sunoco on our natural resources and the disruption of everyday life in the community.</p>
<p>“Our residents deserve to feel safe at home and know that their right to clean air and water is protected.”</p>
<p><strong>Food &#038; Water Action organizer Sam Rubin released the following statement:</strong></p>
<p>“Sunoco’s negligence has created a series of entirely predictable disasters, the most recent being the massive spill at Marsh Creek Lake. This dangerous, unnecessary pipeline does not need to be re-routed. It must be shut down entirely. The Wolf administration has given Sunoco a green light to pollute communities across the commonwealth, in order to build a dangerous explosive pipeline that only serves to deliver raw materials to make plastic junk. Sunoco’s record of negligence and malfeasance speaks for itself; the only question is whether Governor Wolf will finally protect Pennsylvania from this corporate menace.”</p>
<p><strong>Kurt Knaus, spokesman for the Pennsylvania Energy Infrastructure Alliance:</strong> “PA-DEP’s order to reroute this portion of the project is no small matter, especially when you consider the pipe in this area is meant to connect two existing pipes that are already in the ground&#8230;&#8230;.”</p>
<p>“&#8230;&#8230;Communities that thought this project was coming to an end now face potentially many more months of disruption, because this action has the potential of dramatically extending the construction life of a pipeline project that was nearly finished&#8230;&#8230;” </p>
<p>“&#8230;&#8230;The economic impacts are just as real. Hundreds of local jobs are at stake downstream at Marcus Hook and along the line itself because of potential construction delays. This is Pennsylvania’s largest infrastructure project and it remains vital to the entire commonwealth, which is why it needs to move forward, not backward.”</p>
<p>#####.    #####.    #####.    #####.    #####.      </p>
<p><strong>See also</strong>: <a href="https://www.insidesources.com/pa-pipeline-shift-will-share-the-wealth-with-midwest-markets/">PA Pipeline Shift Will ‘Share The Wealth’ With Midwest Markets</a>, Michael Sandoval, Inside Sources, December 15, 2020</p>
<p>Energy Transfer’s (ET) recent announcement that it will convert the Mariner East 1 pipeline to help transport refined products from the Midwest to Pennsylvania and the northeast will be a boon to both northeast energy consumers and midwest producers, industry analysts say.</p>
<p>“PA Access will utilize part of our Mariner East 1 pipeline to provide about 20,000 – 25,000 barrels per day of refined products from the Midwest supply regions through our Allegheny Access pipeline system into Pennsylvania and to markets in the Northeast,” the company said in November. The service will begin in the fourth quarter of 2020.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://www.frackcheckwv.net/2020/12/28/mariner-east-pipeline-is-unsafe-must-be-rerouted-in-penna/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mariner East 2 Pipeline Hearing on April 30th, Written Comments Requested</title>
		<link>https://www.frackcheckwv.net/2018/04/24/mariner-east-2-pipeline-hearing-on-april-30th-written-comments-requested/</link>
		<comments>https://www.frackcheckwv.net/2018/04/24/mariner-east-2-pipeline-hearing-on-april-30th-written-comments-requested/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2018 11:00:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Duane Nichols</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Accidents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Advocacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chemicals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DEP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Events]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Industry news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Study]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chester County]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[explosions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fires]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[leaks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LPG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mariner East]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PA-DEP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pipeline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sink holes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sunoco]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frackcheckwv.net/?p=23422</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sunoco proposes changes to Mariner East 2 construction in Chester County; PA-DEP sets public hearing From an Article by Jon Hurdle, NPR StateImpact Penna., April 17, 2018 In March, residents of Chester County’s West Whiteland Township pressed pipeline regulators for answers on Sunoco’s Mariner East construction after it produced sink holes behind some local homes. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p><div id="attachment_23479" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 300px">
	<a href="/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/F379FB20-8EDA-4E44-956F-E44178C5A7AF.png"><img src="/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/F379FB20-8EDA-4E44-956F-E44178C5A7AF-300x297.png" alt="" title="F379FB20-8EDA-4E44-956F-E44178C5A7AF" width="300" height="297" class="size-medium wp-image-23479" /></a>
	<p class="wp-caption-text">Southeast PA &#038; Mason-Dixon Line (circular arc) to Delaware River</p>
</div><strong>Sunoco proposes changes to Mariner East 2 construction in Chester County; PA-DEP sets public hearing</strong></p>
<p>From an <a href="https://stateimpact.npr.org/pennsylvania/2018/04/17/sunoco-proposes-changes-to-mariner-east-2-construction-in-chester-county-dep-sets-public-hearing/">Article by Jon Hurdle</a>, NPR StateImpact Penna., April 17, 2018</p>
<p>In March, residents of Chester County’s West Whiteland Township pressed pipeline regulators for answers on Sunoco’s Mariner East construction after it produced sink holes behind some local homes.<br />
Pennsylvania’s Department of Environmental Protection will hold a public hearing on plans by Sunoco Pipeline to modify its construction of the controversial Mariner East pipelines at two sites in Chester County’s West Whiteland Township.</p>
<p>The DEP said Monday that Sunoco proposes to change its construction method for the pipelines from horizontal directional drilling (HDD) to a conventional bore at one site and from HDD to a combination of conventional bore, open trench and HDD at the other sit</p>
<p>The changes would mean “major modifications” to the company’s permits under the DEP’s Chapter 105 water obstruction and Chapter 102 erosion control regulations, and so require DEP approval after a public hearing, the department said in a statement.</p>
<p>The meeting will be held on April 30 from 6:30 pm to 9:30 pm at the EN Peirce Middle School in West Chester. The DEP also extended a public-comment period from April 21 until May 11.</p>
<p>The statement said one of the affected sites is on East Swedesford Road, where the local water utility, Aqua America, has raised concerns about a well at Hillside Drive. The other location is along North Pottstown Pike, where the new work plan has been prompted by hydrogeological analysis and seismic testing, DEP said. Sunoco submitted both plans last October.</p>
<p>The sites are among about 60 along the cross-state pipeline route that have been subject to a court-ordered “re-evaluation” of local geology after a string of drilling-fluid spills.</p>
<p>Sunoco sought the change “to ensure Aqua America’s water supply would not be impacted,” spokesperson Lisa Dillinger wrote in an email. The change would allow construction to continue “in the most efficient manner possible while keeping safety as our first priority.”</p>
<p>In early March, the Public Utility Commission shut down operation of the parallel Mariner East 1 pipeline at Lisa Drive in the township because of concerns that building Mariner East 2 and 2X pipelines through limestone geology might compromise the safety of the existing line. The PUC’s action was triggered by the appearance of sinkholes near two suburban developments.</p>
<p>In August 2017, a state court temporarily halted drilling at nearby Valleyview Drive after HDD punctured an aquifer, causing some private water wells to turn cloudy and leading Sunoco to pay for affected homeowners to be connected to public water.</p>
<p>David Mano, a resident of Valleyview Drive whose well water was affected, said he has no more confidence in the company’s new plans than in the previous construction because both proposals have been made by the same contractor, Tetra Tech.</p>
<p>“They still don’t know what they’re doing,” Mano said, referring to Sunoco. “They are going by Tetra Tech which is the company that did the first evaluation for this area, and they said, ‘It’s OK go ahead and drill.’ You saw what happened with that.</p>
<p>“Now, the same company is saying, ‘You can drill but not so deep,’” he said. “How can we trust them?”</p>
<p>The Middletown Coalition for Community Safety, an anti-pipeline group in neighboring Delaware County, said DEP staff and some 30,000 public commenters had recognized the risks to public safety from a pipeline carrying highly volatile liquids through some of Philadelphia’s densely populated western suburbs when Sunoco’s original plan was approved.</p>
<p>The group said in a statement that it “trusts that this time around, Gov. Wolf and his Department of Environmental Protection will fully consider the public and school safety risks and economic downsides of Sunoco’s ‘major modification’ proposal for the Exton area.”</p>
<p>Tetra Tech said in a letter published on the DEP’s website that the new construction would avoid problematic geology. By using the new installation methods, it said, “SPLP is able to avoid geology which would make a HDD installation difficult while maintaining the avoidance of impacts to resources and sensitive areas.”</p>
<p>The DEP set a three-minute limit for individual speakers at the April 30 hearing, and imposed a limit of one speaker per organization. Speakers were also asked to submit their comments in writing.</p>
<p>Mariner East 2, which has been under construction since February 2017, is scheduled to begin operation by the end of June. Dillinger said the change in construction method, if approved, would not affect that timeline.</p>
<p>When complete, the line will carry ethane, butane and propane some 350 miles from western Pennsylvania to a terminal at Marcus Hook near Philadelphia where most of it will be exported.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://www.frackcheckwv.net/2018/04/24/mariner-east-2-pipeline-hearing-on-april-30th-written-comments-requested/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
