<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Frack Check WV &#187; scientific research</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.frackcheckwv.net/tag/scientific-research/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.frackcheckwv.net</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress site</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Mar 2024 22:41:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) at United Nations Must be Funded</title>
		<link>https://www.frackcheckwv.net/2017/05/15/intergovernmental-panel-on-climate-change-ipcc-at-united-nations-must-be-funded/</link>
		<comments>https://www.frackcheckwv.net/2017/05/15/intergovernmental-panel-on-climate-change-ipcc-at-united-nations-must-be-funded/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 May 2017 05:05:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Duane Nichols</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Accidents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Advocacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chemicals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Events]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Study]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[funding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[global warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IPCC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scientific research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sea level rise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United Nations]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frackcheckwv.net/?p=19984</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Climate negotiators rally to protect IPCC science funding From an Article by Karl Mathiesen in Bonn, Climate Change News, May 12, 2017 National delegates in Bonn rejected a proposal by UN Framework Convention on Climate Change to stop funding science reports from its core budget Indignant countries at climate talks in Bonn have demanded that [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p><strong> </strong></p>
<div id="attachment_19988" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 300px">
	<a href="/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/Name-Tag-Climate-is-Complicated.jpg"><img class="size-medium wp-image-19988" title="$ - Name Tag -- Climate is Complicated" src="/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/Name-Tag-Climate-is-Complicated-300x125.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="125" /></a>
	<p class="wp-caption-text">The science has simplified these issues </p>
</div>
<p><strong><strong>Climate negotiators rally to protect IPCC science funding</strong></strong></p>
<p><strong><strong><a title="Climate Change News:  IPCC Funding" href="http://www.climatechangenews.com/2017/05/12/climate-negotiators-rally-protect-ipcc-science-panel-funding/" target="_blank">From an Article</a> by <a title="http://www.climatechangenews.com/author/karl-mathiesen/" href="http://www.climatechangenews.com/author/karl-mathiesen/" target="_blank">Karl Mathiesen</a> in Bonn, Climate Change News, May 12, 2017</p>
<p><strong>National delegates in Bonn rejected a proposal by UN Framework Convention on Climate Change to stop funding science reports from its core budget</strong></p>
<p><strong>Indignant countries at climate talks in Bonn have demanded that the UN climate convention continues funding the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), the world’s leading authority on climate science.</strong></p>
<p>A <a title="http://unfccc.int/documentation/documents/advanced_search/items/6911.php?priref=600009415#beg" href="http://unfccc.int/documentation/documents/advanced_search/items/6911.php?priref=600009415#beg" target="_blank">draft 2018-19 budget</a> from the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) proposes to eliminate its funding for the IPCC, asking countries to support the body with direct voluntary payments.</p>
<p>But according to several sources present at a budget discussion on Wednesday evening, countries rounded on the UN secretariat.</p>
<p>Shifting the onus of the funding from the core budget of the UNFCCC, which is funded by compulsory contributions from member states, to individual country donors, would allow some to free-ride. Rarely so united at these talks, the majority of parties rejected the secretariat’s proposal.</p>
<p>“Parties are the supreme body of this convention, they are the secretariat,” said Bernarditas Muller, a climate advisor to the Philippines government and the Group of 77 and China negotiating bloc.</p>
<p>A German diplomat at the talks told Climate Home: “We made that point very clear that as these two institutions are so closely interlinked, that we would see it as a very bad signal if the UNFCCC contributions to the IPCC wouldn’t continue. And there is as far as I hear it right now a lot of support for that view.”</p>
<p>The UNFCCC sent $243,245 to the IPCC in 2016. Between $250,000 and $300,000 per year had been earmarked for the next budget, according to UNFCCC spokesman Nicholas Nuttall.</p>
<p>Asked whether there had been a pushback from countries, Nuttall said he would not characterise it as such. “More a great deal of interest to really understand our current budget,” he said.</p>
<p>“The UNFCCC secretariat have appreciated how much and how openly all countries are engaging on the budget discussions and we hope we can realise a successful outcome by the end of the May sessions with a view to this budget,” added Nuttall.</p>
<p>The IPCC has struggled for funding in recent years. In 2016, it gathered $4.3m from donor countries and various UN bodies, including the UNFCCC. In 2013, the body collected more than $7m.</p>
<p>Muller said science from the IPCC, which conducts periodic and comprehensive reviews of global climate science, formed the basis of the convention. “They are independent, they are not under our control. But they provide us with scientific analysis. And we can, as parties, request them to do work. They are the ones actually, who put this issue on the political agenda of states. It’s only if you put it on the political agenda that you can get decisions and policy to address the problem,” she said.</p>
<p>The IPCC and UNFCCC have both been <a title="http://www.climatechangenews.com/2017/03/16/trump-budget-us-stop-funding-un-climate-process/" href="http://www.climatechangenews.com/2017/03/16/trump-budget-us-stop-funding-un-climate-process/" target="_blank">singled out</a> by US president Donald Trump as organisations from which he wants to cut funding in upcoming budgets. The US is the biggest single funder of the UN climate process.</p>
<p><strong>In its draft budget, the UNFCCC assumes the US will continue to contribute.</strong></p>
<p><strong>See:  <a title="Climate Change News" href="http://www.climatechangenews.com">Climate Change News</a></strong></p>
<p><strong>See also:  <a title="NASA Vital Signs of the Planet" href="https://climate.nasa.gov" target="_blank">Global Climate Change: Vital Signs of the Planet</a></strong></p>
<p></strong></strong></p>
<p><strong><strong> </strong></strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://www.frackcheckwv.net/2017/05/15/intergovernmental-panel-on-climate-change-ipcc-at-united-nations-must-be-funded/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The US Anti-Science Budget Proposal is an Insult to our Earth</title>
		<link>https://www.frackcheckwv.net/2017/04/23/the-us-anti-science-budget-proposal-is-an-insult-to-our-earth/</link>
		<comments>https://www.frackcheckwv.net/2017/04/23/the-us-anti-science-budget-proposal-is-an-insult-to-our-earth/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Apr 2017 09:05:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Duane Nichols</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Accidents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Advocacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chemicals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EPA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Events]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Study]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Earth Day]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[March for Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scientific research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US EPA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frackcheckwv.net/?p=19843</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Trump’s anti-science budget will be a disaster for America’s bottom line From an Article by Denis Hayes, Los Angeles Times, April 22, 2017 In its approach to scientific research, President Trump’s budget can be accurately described as a mugging. I’ve watched this happen before, up close and personal. It does not end well. In 1979, President Carter [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p><strong> </strong></p>
<div id="attachment_19856" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 300px">
	<a href="/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/March-April-23-20171.jpg"><img class="size-medium wp-image-19856" title="$ - March April 23-2017" src="/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/March-April-23-20171-300x168.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="168" /></a>
	<p class="wp-caption-text">Science is the Answer in Fact</p>
</div>
<p><strong>Trump’s anti-science budget will be a disaster for America’s bottom line</strong></p>
<p>From an Article by Denis Hayes, Los Angeles Times, April 22, 2017</p>
<p>In its approach to scientific research, President Trump’s budget can be accurately described as a mugging. I’ve watched this happen before, up close and personal. It does not end well.</p>
<p>In 1979, President Carter set an ambitious but achievable goal to get 20% of the nation’s energy from renewable sources by the year 2000. I then headed the federal Solar Energy Research Institute, which spearheaded the Manhattan Project to Harness the Sun. In the late 1970s, the United States had more PhDs in the solar field, filed more solar patents and made more commercial solar modules than the rest of the nations in the world combined.</p>
<p>In its first year, the Reagan administration slashed the solar institute’s staff by 40%, reduced its budget by 80% and abruptly terminated all of its 1,000-plus university research contracts (including shutting down work by two professors who later went on to win Nobel Prizes). The firings were so wantonly brutal that many of the researchers were driven into other fields. The consequences have been huge.</p>
<p>In 2016, solar energy was the United States’ largest source of new electricity-generating capacity, contributing roughly 40% of the total from all sources. The U.S. solar industry now employs 260,000 people, more than three times as many workers as the coal industry. Most of them install and maintain photovoltaic panels that convert free, nonpolluting sunlight into power. But nearly all the solar modules these workers install are being developed and manufactured abroad. The U.S. makes just 5% of the world’s solar panels.</p>
<p><strong>Defunding science is the intellectual equivalent of eating our seed corn</strong>.</p>
<p>America ought to own the solar-electric industry. By rights, we ought to be exporting solar technology, not importing it. Our second-tier status, in a field that we once absolutely dominated, is a direct consequence of budget decisions made by President Reagan’s Office of Management and Budget, and a go-along Congress.</p>
<p>Adjusted for inflation, the budget of the solar institute (since renamed the National Renewable Energy Laboratory) did not recover to its 1979 level until 2008. Science research can’t be revved up and down like an engine and succeed. If you pull the funding out from under a field of inquiry, it will stall and fall behind at best.</p>
<p><strong>Now the Trump science budget proposes to make Reagan’s mistake all over again, across many more fields</strong>.</p>
<p>The administration’s funding plan entirely eliminates the Department of Energy’s most exciting, cutting- edge, high-risk, high-potential research program, ARPA-E, the Advanced Research Projects Agency-Energy.</p>
<p>Its double-digit cuts to the National Institutes of Health — America’s research bulwark against infectious diseases, cancer and other threats to public health — could mean the NIH will be unable to issue any new research grants in 2018.</p>
<p>The Trump budget cuts the Environmental Protection Agency’s Office of Research by 50%. (Earlier, the EPA’s new overseers eliminated “science” from the mission statement of its Office of Science and Technology Policy, as though science were now a dirty word.)</p>
<p>Federal climate studies will be eviscerated, and references to climate change have been scrubbed from some federal websites. (But, as Neil DeGrasse Tyson famously said, “The good thing about science is that it’s true whether or not you believe in it.”)</p>
<p>The Sea Grant program — which supports more than 3,000 scientists, engineers, educators and students working to protect and sustain coastal ecosystems, communities and resources at 300 institutions — is entirely eliminated. So is the Chemical Safety Board.</p>
<p>Funding for restoration of the Great Lakes, Chesapeake Bay, Puget Sound, San Francisco Bay and other waterways is also essentially deleted.</p>
<p>Science has always been at the heart of America’s progress. Science cleaned up our air and water, conquered polio and invented jet airplanes. Science gave us the Internet, puts food on our tables and helps us avoid pandemics. Science and technology are widely considered by economists to be responsible for at least half of American economic growth since World War II.</p>
<p><strong>Defunding science is the intellectual equivalent of eating our seed corn.</strong></p>
<p>On Earth Day — April 22 — I see millions of Americans are joining the March for Science. They include researchers, teachers, students and people who simply support good sense.</p>
<p>We are marching because, if we let politics overtake the search for truth, much of what has made America great will disappear.</p>
<p>&gt;&gt;&gt; Denis Hayes, president and chief executive of the Bullitt Foundation, was the convener of the first Earth Day. He was a primary speaker at the March for Science on Earth Day this year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://www.frackcheckwv.net/2017/04/23/the-us-anti-science-budget-proposal-is-an-insult-to-our-earth/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
