Prof. Hayhoe has the facts on the climate

Essay by Katharine Hayhoe, Climate Scientist, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX

Reference: Science 01 Jun 2018: Vol. 360, Issue 6392, pp. 943

Science is based on a shared respect for the scientific method — the principle that, by gathering and analyzing data and information, scientists and others can draw conclusions that are robust and generalizable across cultures and ideologies. Scientists furthermore assume that disagreements can be resolved by more facts. So when people object to the reality of climate change with science-y sounding arguments—“the data is wrong,” or “it’s just a natural cycle,” or even, “we need to study it longer”—the natural response of scientists is simple and direct: People need more data. But this approach often doesn’t work and can even backfire. Why? Because when it comes to climate change, science-y sounding objections are a mere smokescreen to hide the real reasons, which have much more to do with identity and ideology than data and facts.

“…changing minds…requires…practical, viable, and attractive solutions that someone can get excited about.”

For years, climate change has been one of the most politically polarized issues in the United States. Today, the best predictor of whether the public agrees with the reality of anthropogenic climate change is not how much scientific information there is. It’s where each person falls on the political spectrum. That’s why the approach of bombarding the unconvinced with more data doesn’t work — people see it as an attack on their identity and an attempt to change their way of life.

I am a climate scientist who has spent a lot of time trying to make climate science more accessible. I’ve authored National Climate Assessments and numerous outreach reports; I host a YouTube show called Global Weirding; I tweet; I’ve even promoted knitting patterns that display rising temperatures. Yet the most important step I’ve taken to make my science communication more effective has nothing to do with the science. As uncomfortable as this is for a scientist in today’s world, the most effective thing I’ve done is to let people know that I am a Christian. Why? Because it’s essential to connect the impacts of a changing climate directly to what’s already meaningful in one’s life, and for many people, faith is central to who they are.

Scientists can be effective communicators by bonding over a value that they genuinely share with the people with whom they’re speaking. It doesn’t have to be a shared faith. It could be that both are parents, or live in the same place, or are concerned about water resources or national security, or enjoy the same outdoor activities. Instead of beginning with what most divides scientists from others, start the conversation from a place of agreement and mutual respect. Then, scientists can connect the dots: share from their head and heart why they care.

Talking about impacts isn’t enough, though. Sadly, the most dangerous myth that many people have bought into is, “it doesn’t matter to me,” and the second most dangerous myth is, “there’s nothing I can do about it.” If scientists describe the daunting challenge of climate change but can’t offer an engaging solution, then people’s natural defense mechanism is to disassociate from the reality of the problem. That’s why changing minds also requires providing practical, viable, and attractive solutions that someone can get excited about. Concerned homeowner? Mention the amazing benefits of energy conservation. Worried parent? Bring up the practical steps to take to make outdoor play spaces safer for kids, even in the hot summer. Business executive? Talk about the economic benefits of renewables.

We all live on the same planet, and we all want the same things. By connecting our heads to our hearts, we all can talk about — and tackle — the problem of climate change together.

>>> Katharine Hayhoe is a professor and director of the Climate Science Center at Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX, USA. See also: www.katharinehayhoe.com

The Blue-Green Future is Bright

“Mother Jones would be so happy to see this, in my opinion.”

“Yes, I agree!”

BlueGreen Alliance Unites Labor and . . . Environmentalists

Broadcast From The Allegheny Front, www.AlleghenyFront.org, September 4, 2015

As some traditional blue-collar jobs like those in the coal industry are being lost, labor unions are regrouping and finding new allies—like environmentalists. Kim Glas is helping the two communities find common ground. She’s the new executive director of the BlueGreen Alliance, a partnership of 10 labor unions and five national environmental groups that pushes for green job growth. Recently, Kara Holsopple spoke with Kim Glas about how the labor and environmental movements are finding new ways to work together. Here are some highlights from the interview:

On the importance of labor and environmental groups working together

“I think that the labor and environmental movements aren’t movements that have naturally worked together until recently. And the vision of the BlueGreen Alliance—which was started by Leo Gerard, the President of the United Steelworkers, and the Sierra Club—was to really bring a collaboration between the labor constituencies and the environmental community; figuring out ways to push a common agenda: How do we address climate change [in a way] that actually creates jobs here in this country and provides opportunities for our workforce. Whether you’re addressing carbon mitigation, fuel efficiency in the auto sector, there are a variety of ways you can see an economy moving forward that addresses our environmental concerns, but also our economic ones.”

On challenges faced by workers in the changing energy economy

“In Pennsylvania, workers in the coal industry have lost their jobs as the energy transformation has hit Pennsylvania and other states. And the BlueGreen Alliance has strongly committed to working on a just transition for these workers. And when I’m talking about a just transition, it’s not, ‘here’s an unemployment check.’ This is really about trying to get workers who are highly skilled, highly paid, who work in impacted industries, into other industries and highly skilled, highly paid jobs. Unfortunately, for workers impacted in the coal industry, who make a family-sustaining wage, looking at solar and wind—those industries pay less at this time. And that’s something that the BlueGreen Alliance has been working on: How to create jobs in those industries that also produce family-sustaining wages.”

“We were very pleased when the [Obama] administration announced the POWER Plus program, which ensures security for workers who may be losing their pensions if they are employed in the coal industry, and [for] certain communities that have been impacted by a coal-fired power plant closing down. But the issue is that Congress has not allocated the full funding necessary to make sure this program is fully realized.”

On the importance of government support for green industries

“There definitely has to be buy-in on both the federal and state level. Congress has not extended the wind-production tax credits and that has led to uncertainty in the market. And as wind manufacturers are looking for opportunities to expand, they’re looking for leadership coming out of the U.S. Congress to ensure that these types of tax credits are extended and that there is reliability and certainty in the marketplace. That’s not a partisan issue. That’s just the reality of trying to ensure the renewable energy sector also has opportunities to grow and expand, which has been successful in the past.”

To read more, visit  bluegreenalliance.org.