<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Frack Check WV &#187; ownership</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.frackcheckwv.net/tag/ownership/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.frackcheckwv.net</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress site</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Mar 2024 22:41:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Upcoming Meetings: WV-SORO Membership Meeting, August 23rd</title>
		<link>https://www.frackcheckwv.net/2014/07/20/upcoming-meetings-wv-soro-membership-meeting-august-23rd/</link>
		<comments>https://www.frackcheckwv.net/2014/07/20/upcoming-meetings-wv-soro-membership-meeting-august-23rd/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2014 11:36:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Duane Nichols</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Accidents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Advocacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chemicals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DEP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EPA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Events]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Study]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drilling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environmental impacts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fracking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[leasing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marcellus shale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ownership]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Salem University]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WV SORO]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frackcheckwv.net/?p=12309</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[WV Surface Owners Rights Organization &#8212; Update From a Letter by Julie Archer, July 18, 2014 Mark Your Calendars: WV-SORO Membership Meeting, August 23rd Please mark your calendars for WV-SORO&#8217;s upcoming membership meeting. The meeting will be Saturday, August 23rd at Salem International University in Salem, WV, from 10 AM-4 PM, followed by a public [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p><strong>WV Surface Owners Rights Organization &#8212; Update</strong>	</p>
<p>From a <a href="http://www.wvsoro.org">Letter by Julie Archer</a>, July 18, 2014</p>
<p>Mark Your Calendars: WV-SORO Membership Meeting, August 23rd</p>
<p>Please mark your calendars for WV-SORO&#8217;s upcoming membership meeting. The meeting will be Saturday, August 23rd at Salem International University in Salem, WV, from 10 AM-4 PM, followed by a public screening of &#8220;Triple Divide&#8221; at 5PM. Lunch will be provided. </p>
<p>Salem is in Harrison County, west of Clarksburg on US Route 50 and very near Doddridge County.</p>
<p>We are still working on the agenda but the goals and objectives of the meeting are:</p>
<p>1) Solicit input from SORO members on organizational focus/priorities.</p>
<p>We are entering our 7th year. A lot has changes since SORO was formed in 2007.  We have tried to be adaptable and respond as issues come up &#8212; but there are so many issues.  We want to know what issues to prioritize and how we can be more effective.</p>
<p>2) Educate SORO members on current issues of concern.</p>
<p>Pipelines are a major issue right now, with three proposed gas transmission lines crossing the state, not to mention various other projects planned or in the works for gathering lines, as well as lines for transporting water and waste water. Who has oversight/control over these lines?  What to do about right-of-ways? What comes next?  (Compressor stations, more drilling etc.) With this in mind we are starting to put together a panel on pipeline issues with folks from various state and federal agencies &#8212; DEP, PSC, FERC &#8212; to answer some of these important questions. </p>
<p>More details coming soon.  In the meantime, please save the date and plan to join us on August 23rd. We look forward to seeing you there. </p>
<p>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>></p>
<p><strong>Workshops on Understanding Renegotiation and Renewal of Natural Gas Leases</strong>, July 22nd &#038; July 24th. Sponsored by: WVU Extension Service Natural Gas Education Team</p>
<p>Presenter: Eric Gordon of Berry, Kessler, Crutchfield, Taylor and Gordon, Attorneys at Law, from Moundsville, WV</p>
<p>Tuesday, July 22nd in Wheeling, WV &#038; Thursday, July 24th in West Union, WV</p>
<p>Both Workshops begin at 6:00 PM For program schedule and directions see the <a href="http://anr.ext.wvu.edu/oil_gas">WVU extension web site.</a></p>
<p>For more information, contact Georgette Plaugher, WVU Extension Service Natural Gas Team Coordinator at 304-329-1391 or via e-mail Georgy.Plaugher@mail.wvu.edu.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://www.frackcheckwv.net/2014/07/20/upcoming-meetings-wv-soro-membership-meeting-august-23rd/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>GUEST COMMENTARY: Authority on Marcellus shale not telling all</title>
		<link>https://www.frackcheckwv.net/2012/07/21/guest-commentary-authority-on-marcellus-shale-not-telling-all/</link>
		<comments>https://www.frackcheckwv.net/2012/07/21/guest-commentary-authority-on-marcellus-shale-not-telling-all/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jul 2012 09:05:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>S. Tom Bond</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[authority]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drilling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fracking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[land]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marcellus shale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[natural gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ownership]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[protection]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frackcheckwv.net/?p=5564</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[NOTE:  The following guest editorial was published well over a year ago, but is still relevant. Publication: The Morgantown Dominion Post;  Date: March 13, 2011;  Section: Opinion; Page Number: 2-D; GUEST COMMENTARY:  Authority on Marcellus shale not telling all BY S. THOMAS BOND Authority is part of the problem with Marcellus shale drilling. The industry [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>NOTE:  The following guest editorial was published well over a year ago, but is still relevant.</p>
<p>Publication: The Morgantown Dominion Post;  Date: March 13, 2011; </p>
<p>Section: Opinion; Page Number: 2-D; GUEST COMMENTARY: </p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><strong>Authority on Marcellus shale not telling all</strong></p>
<p>BY S. THOMAS BOND</p>
<p>Authority is part of the problem with Marcellus shale drilling. The industry members are very connected, very disciplined, very motivated and they are assuring the public that there is no problem with the methods of drilling, and what’s called “due diligence.”</p>
<p>On the other hand, the complaints come from people who are rural, many of whom lack education and who don’t “network” with political power.</p>
<p>But they have the “facts on the ground” to use a current phrase. You can visit them, because they have time and lots of motivation to talk. Authority — real authority at the top — doesn’t converse with individuals. It hires someone else to do that.</p>
<p>You also can see pictures of the damage, and there is actually a vast amount of literature going back to the time horizontal drilling and slick water fracturing began. For example, yesterday a friend sent me an article about Marcellus wells leaking in Quebec, and how that was changing the Canadian government’s view of Marcellus development. I remembered an earlier article, so Googled “leaking Marcellus wells” and got more than 300,000 articles on leaking Marcellus wells. By adding “Quebec” to the query I was able to find the case the friend was referring to, which involved 19 out of 31 wells.</p>
<p>There are many groups who could put inquiring individuals in contact with folks whose property or lives have been damaged, more than one would have time to contact. I know a forester, people who have retired from other states and even a state Division of Environmental Protection employee who have had problems. Contacting people is slow, laborious work — looking at their claims. But these are the “facts on the ground” that contravene the propaganda that nothing is wrong in the oil patch.</p>
<p>The New York Times is running a series of articles on the Marcellus. They have tremendous resources and the series is comprehensive. One of the most telling articles is “Pressure limits efforts to police drilling for gas” by Ian Urbana, published March 3, 2011. It concerns the industry effort to remain unregulated by the federal government.</p>
<p>The industry knows what it is doing. There is no more telling indication of that than the exemptions for the drilling industry built into the Energy Act of 2005. Former Vice President Dick Cheney marshaled a commission to study energy needs, and the resulting bill exempted the drilling industry from the Clean Water Act, the Safe Drinking Water Act and the Brownfields Act, the last of which requires the industry make a toxic mess to clean it up.</p>
<p>Environmentalism is often cast as people with sentimental attachment to trees and birds and landscapes. However, at a more fundamental level, it has to do with preserving resources for the future. Recorded history goes back about 8,000 years. Hopefully there will be something here for people to live on thousands of years in the future.</p>
<p>Environmentalism is about avoiding degradation of land, water and air so they can be used in the future. There surely will be life beyond the end of current business deals. Landowners and environmentalists are natural allies in their concerns about the damage going on.</p>
<p>So the debate involves two kinds of authority, the authority of a well-organized group with a lot to gain, who have wealth, public relations and political influence, and gains to society now, on the one hand; and on the other, a huge, unorganized and disconnected group, some of whom have much to lose, and others who have everything to lose, plus perpetual gains to society in the future. The facts lie with the latter, and all the industry can do is to delay public awareness.</p>
<p>S. THOMAS BOND is a retired teacher with a Ph.D. in inorganic chemistry. He is a member of the Guardians of the West Fork and Monongahela Area Watershed Compact. He lives near Jane Lew. This commentary should be considered another point of view and not necessarily the opinion or editorial policy of The  Morgantown Dominion Post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://www.frackcheckwv.net/2012/07/21/guest-commentary-authority-on-marcellus-shale-not-telling-all/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Special Report on the CEO of Chesapeake Energy</title>
		<link>https://www.frackcheckwv.net/2012/04/20/special-report-on-the-ceo-of-chesapeake-energy/</link>
		<comments>https://www.frackcheckwv.net/2012/04/20/special-report-on-the-ceo-of-chesapeake-energy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2012 15:50:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Duane Nichols</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chesapeake Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drilling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[natural gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ownership]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shale fracking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wells]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frackcheckwv.net/?p=4688</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[CEO McClendon According to a Special Report by Reuters, the CEO of Chesapeake Energy helped cause stock shares to plummet amid a financial crisis when he sold hundreds of millions of dollars in stock to raise cash for himself. And, to settle a lawsuit by shareholders, he agreed to buy back a $12 million map [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><div class="mceTemp">
<dl id="attachment_4689" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 193px;">
<dt class="wp-caption-dt"><a href="/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/CEO-McClendon.jpg"><img class="size-full wp-image-4689" title="CEO McClendon" src="/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/CEO-McClendon.jpg" alt="" width="183" height="275" /></a></dt>
<dd class="wp-caption-dd">CEO McClendon</dd>
</dl>
<p>According to a <a title="Special Report on Chesapeake Energy CEO" href="http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/04/18/us-chesapeake-mcclendon-loans-idUSBRE83H0GA20120418" target="_blank">Special Report by Reuters</a>, the CEO of Chesapeake Energy helped cause stock shares to plummet amid a financial crisis when he sold hundreds of millions of dollars in stock to raise cash for himself. And, to settle a lawsuit by shareholders, he agreed to buy back a $12 million map collection that he&#8217;d sold to Chesapeake.</p>
<p>Now, a series of undisclosed loans to McClendon could once again put Chesapeake&#8217;s CEO and shareholders in disagreement. McClendon borrowed about $1.1 billion in the last three years using his stake in the company&#8217;s oil and natural gas wells as collateral, documents reviewed by Reuters show.</p>
<p>The loans were made through three companies controlled by McClendon that list Chesapeake&#8217;s headquarters as their address. The money is being used to help finance a 2.5% ownership in each of the drilled wells for McClendon himself. This raises conflict of interest questions on behalf of the Chesapeake CEO.</p>
<p>&#8220;Basically what you have here is a private transaction that could potentially impact a public company, depending on the manner in which the clause is interpreted and applied,&#8221; says Thomas O. Gorman, a partner at law firm Dorsey &amp; Whitney in Washington, D.C., and a former special trial counsel at the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). &#8220;That may create a conflict of interest.&#8221; As a result, the loans should have been fully disclosed to Chesapeake shareholders, the academics, attorneys and analysts said.</p>
<p>The <a title="Special Report on Chesapeake Energy CEO" href="http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/04/18/us-chesapeake-mcclendon-loans-idUSBRE83H0GA20120418" target="_blank">Special Report from Reuters</a> was prepared by Anna Driver in Houston and Brian Grow in Atlanta.  It is an extensive report on many of the less well known aspects of Chesapeake Energy and its unusual CEO Aubrey McClendon. And, this report provides some of the responses from Chesapeake Energy to the critical comments that others have made.</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://www.frackcheckwv.net/2012/04/20/special-report-on-the-ceo-of-chesapeake-energy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
