<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Frack Check WV &#187; MI</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.frackcheckwv.net/tag/mi/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.frackcheckwv.net</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress site</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Mar 2024 22:41:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>WV-DEP Levies $430,000 Fine to Rover Pipeline, Should Be More!</title>
		<link>https://www.frackcheckwv.net/2018/06/15/wv-dep-applies-430000-fine-to-rover-pipeline/</link>
		<comments>https://www.frackcheckwv.net/2018/06/15/wv-dep-applies-430000-fine-to-rover-pipeline/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2018 09:06:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Duane Nichols</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Accidents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Advocacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chemicals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DEP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Events]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Industry news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Study]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[farmland destruction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[land disturbances]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marcellus shale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nationwde Permits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[natural gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OH]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rover Pipeline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sediment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[siltation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stream crossings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[water pollution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wv]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WV-DEP]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frackcheckwv.net/?p=24067</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[West Virginia Assesses Rover $430,030 Fine for Water Pollution Violations From an Article by Jeremiah Shelor, NGI Shale Daily, June 13, 2018 Rover Pipeline LLC has agreed to pay a $430,030 civil penalty for numerous sediment and erosion control violations during construction in West Virginia, according to a consent order released by the state’s Department [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p><div id="attachment_24076" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 300px">
	<a href="/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/82700937-79AB-4C42-B7E1-0DE7954CCDE1.jpeg"><img src="/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/82700937-79AB-4C42-B7E1-0DE7954CCDE1-300x300.jpg" alt="" title="82700937-79AB-4C42-B7E1-0DE7954CCDE1" width="300" height="300" class="size-medium wp-image-24076" /></a>
	<p class="wp-caption-text">Rover Pipeline near Tyler - Wetzel crossing</p>
</div><strong>West Virginia Assesses Rover $430,030 Fine for Water Pollution Violations</strong></p>
<p>From an <a href="http://www.naturalgasintel.com/articles/114706-west-virginia-assesses-rover-430030-fine-for-water-pollution-violations">Article by Jeremiah Shelor, NGI Shale Daily</a>, June 13, 2018</p>
<p>Rover Pipeline LLC has agreed to pay a $430,030 civil penalty for numerous sediment and erosion control violations during construction in West Virginia, according to a consent order released by the state’s Department of Environmental Protection (WVDEP).</p>
<p>The order, dated May 15 and signed by a Rover official on June 1, details a series of water pollution violations found during inspections dating back to April 2017 and as recently as April of this year. The alleged violations generally relate to improper controls to prevent runoff during construction in Doddridge, Tyler and Wetzel counties, where the project’s Sherwood and CGT laterals are routed.</p>
<p>The Rover project’s water pollution violations prompted WVDEP to issue cease and desist orders last July and in March that temporarily halted construction in the state, adding to a list of regulatory run-ins for the massive greenfield Appalachian expansion.</p>
<p>Rover, a 713-mile, 3.25 Bcf/d natural gas pipeline designed to transport supply gathered from West Virginia, Ohio and Pennsylvania to markets in the Midwest, Gulf Coast and Canada, increased its daily throughput this month after receiving FERC authorization to place into service several remaining sections of its second and final phase of construction.</p>
<p>But FERC has yet to approve four supply laterals, including the completed Burgettstown and Majorsville lines, potentially limiting supply into the now fully operational mainline.</p>
<p>“Construction on the Rover Pipeline is essentially complete, and the line has received approval from FERC to transport the full 3.25 Bcf/d,” Rover spokeswoman Alexis Daniel told Shale Daily via email. “We anticipate bringing on the four remaining lateral pipelines shortly, and we remain focused on restoring the entire right-of-way, which has always been our commitment to the landowners. We continue to work with the WVDEP on the terms of the consent order.”</p>
<p>Genscape Inc. analyst Colette Breshears said in a note to clients last month that construction on Rover’s CGT and Sherwood laterals appeared to be largely complete but that landslides may have caused delays.</p>
<p>“Continued earth movement/slips along” the remaining laterals could impact Federal Energy Regulatory Commission approval of those lines, “which will impact the addition of supply paths to Rover,” Breshears said at the time.</p>
<p>NGI’s daily Rover Tracker on Wednesday showed the pipeline flowing about 2.1 Bcf/d through its Mainline Zone, including about 1.4 Bcf/d delivered into the ANR and Panhandle Eastern pipelines at Defiance, OH, and just under 800 MMcf/d delivered into Michigan to the Vector Pipeline.</p>
<p>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>></p>
<p><strong>Read</strong> the <a href="https://dep.wv.gov/pio/Documents/Rover%20Pipeline%2c%20LLC%208795.pdf">West Virginia DEP report of violations by Rover here</a>.</p>
<p>==============================</p>
<p><strong>PUBLIC NOTICE FROM WV—DEP on Tuesday, June 12, 2018</strong></p>
<p>The WV Department of Environmental Protection (WVDEP) and Rover Pipeline, LLC have proposed a settlement of Administrative Consent Order No. 8795 which resolves violation(s) of the WV Water Pollution Control Act which occurred in Doddridge, Tyler &#038; Wetzel Counties, WV.  In accordance with the proposed Consent Order, Rover Pipeline, LLC has agreed to pay administrative penalties and to comply with the Act.  </p>
<p><strong>Final settlement is subject to comments received during the thirty (30) day period ending July 13, 2018</strong>. </p>
<p>Further information about this Administrative Consent Order is available by contacting the Chief Inspector, WVDEP/Environmental Enforcement, 601 57th Street SE, Charleston, WV  25304, (304) 926-0470 or by accessing WV Department of Environmental Protection’s website at:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.dep.wv.gov/pio/Pages/Settlements,Ordersouttopublicnotice.aspx">http://www.dep.wv.gov/pio/Pages/Settlements,Ordersouttopublicnotice.aspx</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://www.frackcheckwv.net/2018/06/15/wv-dep-applies-430000-fine-to-rover-pipeline/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rover Pipeline Progressing from WV &amp; PA thru OH &amp; MI</title>
		<link>https://www.frackcheckwv.net/2018/04/30/rover-pipeline-progressing-from-wv-pa-thru-oh-mi/</link>
		<comments>https://www.frackcheckwv.net/2018/04/30/rover-pipeline-progressing-from-wv-pa-thru-oh-mi/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2018 09:05:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Duane Nichols</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Accidents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Advocacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chemicals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Events]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Industry news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Study]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[compressor stations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drilling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[explosions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FERC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fires]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fracking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[natural gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OH]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public danger]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rover Pipeline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wv]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frackcheckwv.net/?p=23542</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rover Gets Limited FERC OK to Start Up Mainline Compressor 3, Segment From an Article by Jeremiah Shelor, NGI Shale Daily, April 26, 2018 FERC on Wednesday gave Rover Pipeline LLC the green light to ramp up part of its second and final phase, bringing the 3.25 Bcf/d Appalachian natural gas takeaway project a step [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p><a href="/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/11EEE25B-22CF-4019-833E-C411EF888583.png"><img src="/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/11EEE25B-22CF-4019-833E-C411EF888583-300x291.png" alt="" title="11EEE25B-22CF-4019-833E-C411EF888583" width="300" height="291" class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-23545" /></a><strong>Rover Gets Limited FERC OK to Start Up Mainline Compressor 3, Segment</strong></p>
<p>From an <a href="http://www.naturalgasintel.com/articles/114162-rover-gets-limited-ferc-ok-to-start-up-mainline-compressor-3-segment">Article by Jeremiah Shelor</a>, NGI Shale Daily, April 26, 2018</p>
<p>FERC on Wednesday gave Rover Pipeline LLC the green light to ramp up part of its second and final phase, bringing the 3.25 Bcf/d Appalachian natural gas takeaway project a step closer to full service, although the authorization was not expected to increase throughput capacity on the pipe.</p>
<p>Federal Energy Regulatory Commission staff authorized Rover to begin service on the Mainline Compressor Station 3 and the segment of its Mainline B running between the second and third of Rover’s mainline compressors [CP15-93].</p>
<p>The order partially grants a request submitted April 13, with Rover’s Defiance Compressor Station, Market Segment and Vector Delivery Meter Station still awaiting FERC’s approval. The in-service request for the other facilities is still under evaluation, according to FERC.</p>
<p>In March, FERC staff took issue with delays in the completion of restoration work at Rover’s Mainline 1 and Mainline 2 compressors, warning that future in-service authorizations could be impacted.</p>
<p>Rover’s February request to start up its Burgettstown Lateral to southwestern Pennsylvania has gone more than two months without an affirmative response from the Commission.</p>
<p>“Wednesday’s authorization is not expected to add additional throughput to Rover’s current roughly 2 Bcf/d capacity levels, as the newly authorized section of Mainline B is located in central Ohio, and will be capped at either end by sections of pipe restricted to only one operational mainline,” Genscape Inc. analysts Colette Breshears and Vanessa Witte said in a note to clients.</p>
<p>The 713-mile Rover project is designed to connect additional volumes of Marcellus and Utica shale gas to markets in the Midwest, Gulf Coast and Canada. The project has recently been transporting around 1.6-1.7 Bcf/d east-to-west across Ohio to interconnects with the ANR and Panhandle Eastern pipelines, according to NGI’s Rover Tracker.</p>
<p>In an update to its project website Wednesday, Rover said it has completed 98% of the horizontal direction drills needed for the pipeline, with total project construction now 99% complete.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://www.frackcheckwv.net/2018/04/30/rover-pipeline-progressing-from-wv-pa-thru-oh-mi/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Abandoned Wells as &#8220;Super-Emitters&#8221; of Greenhouse Gas</title>
		<link>https://www.frackcheckwv.net/2014/12/11/abandoned-wells-as-super-emitters-of-greenhouse-gas/</link>
		<comments>https://www.frackcheckwv.net/2014/12/11/abandoned-wells-as-super-emitters-of-greenhouse-gas/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2014 18:51:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Duane Nichols</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Accidents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Advocacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chemicals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EPA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Events]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Industry news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Study]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abandoned gas wells]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drilling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fracking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[KY]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[methane]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[natural gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NY]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OH]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oil & gas industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wv]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frackcheckwv.net/?p=13297</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Princeton University &#8211; Abandoned wells can be &#8216;super-emitters&#8217; of greenhouse gas(es) From an Article by John Sullivan, Office of Engineering Communications, Princeton University, December 9, 2014 Princeton University researchers have uncovered a previously unknown &#60;or not understood&#62;, and possibly substantial, source of the greenhouse gas methane to the Earth&#8217;s atmosphere. After testing a sample of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><div id="_mcePaste">
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom: 12.0pt;"><strong><span style="font-family: Arial, sans-serif;"> </span></strong></p>
<div id="attachment_13301" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 300px">
	<a href="/wp-content/uploads/2014/12/Abandoned-Gas-Wells2.jpg"><img class="size-medium wp-image-13301" title="Abandoned Gas Wells" src="/wp-content/uploads/2014/12/Abandoned-Gas-Wells2-300x201.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="201" /></a>
	<p class="wp-caption-text">Tens of thousands of abandoned gas wells</p>
</div>
<p><strong>Princeton University &#8211; Abandoned wells can be &#8216;super-emitters&#8217; of greenhouse gas(es)</strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family: Arial, sans-serif;">From an <a title="Abondoned Wells as Super Emitters of Greenhouse Gas" href="http://www.princeton.edu/main/news/archive/S41/80/71G06/index.xml?section=topstories" target="_blank">Article by John Sullivan</a>, Office of Engineering Communications, Princeton University, December 9, 2014</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><a name="comp000040f29f2100000000041996"></a><a name="comp0000546757b300000017dc417a"></a><a name="comp000040f29f2100000000061996"></a><span style="font-family: Arial, sans-serif;">Princeton University researchers have uncovered a previously unknown &lt;or not understood&gt;, and possibly substantial, source of the greenhouse gas methane to the Earth&#8217;s atmosphere.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family: Arial, sans-serif;">After testing a sample of abandoned oil and natural gas wells in northwestern Pennsylvania, the researchers found that many of the old wells leaked substantial quantities of methane. Because there are so many abandoned wells nationwide (a recent study from Stanford University concluded there were roughly 3 million abandoned wells in the United States) the researchers believe the overall contribution of leaking wells could be significant.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><a name="comp0000546757b30000001838417a"></a><span style="font-family: Arial, sans-serif;">The researchers said their findings identify a need to make measurements across a wide variety of regions in Pennsylvania but also in other states with a long history of oil and gas development such as California and Texas. &#8220;The research indicates that this is a source of methane that should not be ignored,&#8221; said <a title="http://www.princeton.edu/cee/people/display_person/?netid=celia" href="http://www.princeton.edu/cee/people/display_person/?netid=celia" target="_self"><span style="color: blue;">Michael Celia</span></a>, the Theodore Shelton Pitney Professor of Environmental Studies and professor of <a title="http://www.princeton.edu/cee/" href="http://www.princeton.edu/cee/" target="_self"><span style="color: blue;">civil and environmental engineering</span></a> at Princeton. &#8220;We need to determine how significant it is on a wider basis.&#8221;</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family: Arial, sans-serif;">Methane is the unprocessed form of natural gas. Scientists say that after carbon dioxide, methane is the most important contributor to the greenhouse effect, in which gases in the atmosphere trap heat that would otherwise radiate from the Earth. Pound for pound, methane has about 20 times the heat-trapping effect as carbon dioxide. Methane is produced naturally, by processes including decomposition, and by human activity such as landfills and oil and gas production.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family: Arial, sans-serif;">While oil and gas companies work to minimize the amount of methane emitted by their operations, almost no attention has been paid to wells that were drilled decades ago. These wells, some of which date back to the 19th century, are typically abandoned and not recorded on official records.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family: Arial, sans-serif;">Mary Kang, then a doctoral candidate in civil and environmental engineering at Princeton, originally began looking into methane emissions from old wells after researching techniques to store carbon dioxide by injecting it deep underground. While examining ways that carbon dioxide could escape underground storage, Kang wondered about the effect of old wells on methane emissions. &#8220;I was looking for data, but it didn&#8217;t exist,&#8221; said Kang, now a postdoctoral researcher at Stanford. </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family: Arial, sans-serif;">In a <a title="http://www.pnas.org/content/early/2014/12/04/1408315111.full.pdf+html" href="http://www.pnas.org/content/early/2014/12/04/1408315111.full.pdf+html" target="_self"><span style="color: blue;">paper</span></a> published Dec. 8 in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, the researchers describe how they chose 19 wells in the adjacent McKean and Potter counties in northwestern Pennsylvania. The wells chosen were all abandoned, and records about the origin of the wells and their conditions did not exist. Only one of the wells was on the state&#8217;s list of abandoned wells. Some of the wells, which can look like a pipe emerging from the ground, are located in forests and others in people&#8217;s yards. Kang said the lack of documentation made it hard to tell when the wells were originally drilled or whether any attempt had been made to plug them. </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family: Arial, sans-serif;">&#8220;What surprised me was that every well we measured had some methane coming out,&#8221; said Celia.<a name="comp0000546757b30000001839417a"></a> To conduct the research, the team placed enclosures called flux chambers over the tops of the wells. They also placed flux chambers nearby to measure the background emissions from the terrain and make sure the methane was emitted from the wells and not the surrounding area. </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family: Arial, sans-serif;">Although all the wells registered some level of methane, about 15 percent emitted the gas at a markedly higher level — thousands of times greater than the lower-level wells. <a title="http://www.princeton.edu/cee/people/display_person/?netid=mauzeral" href="http://www.princeton.edu/cee/people/display_person/?netid=mauzeral" target="_self"><span style="color: blue;">Denise Mauzerall</span></a>, a Princeton professor and a member of the research team, said a critical task is to discover the characteristics of these super-emitting wells.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family: Arial, sans-serif;">Mauzerall said the relatively low number of high-emitting wells could offer a workable solution: while trying to plug every abandoned well in the country might be too costly to be realistic, dealing with the smaller number of high emitters could be possible.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family: Arial, sans-serif;">&#8220;The fact that most of the methane is coming out of a small number of wells should make it easier to address if we can identify the high-emitting wells,&#8221; said Mauzerall, who has a joint appointment as a professor of civil and environmental engineering and as a professor of public and international affairs at the <a title="http://wws.princeton.edu/" href="http://wws.princeton.edu/" target="_self"><span style="color: blue;">Woodrow Wilson School</span></a>.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family: Arial, sans-serif;">The researchers have used their results to extrapolate total methane emissions from abandoned wells in Pennsylvania, although they stress that the results are preliminary because of the relatively small sample. But based on that data, they estimate that emissions from abandoned wells represents as much as 10 percent of methane from human activities in Pennsylvania — about the same amount as caused by current oil and gas production. Also, unlike working wells, which have productive lifetimes of 10 to 15 years, abandoned wells can continue to leak methane for decades. </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family: Arial, sans-serif;">&#8220;This may be a significant source,&#8221; Mauzerall said. &#8220;There is no single silver bullet but if it turns out that we can cap or capture the methane coming off these really big emitters, that would make a substantial difference.&#8221;</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family: Arial, sans-serif;">Besides Kang, who is the paper&#8217;s lead author, Celia and Mauzerall, the paper&#8217;s co-authors include: Tullis Onstott, a professor of geosciences at Princeton; Cynthia Kanno, who was a Princeton undergraduate and who is a graduate student at the Colorado School of Mines; Matthew Reid, who was a graduate student at Princeton and is a postdoctoral researcher at EPFL in Lausanne, Switzerland; Xin Zhang, a postdoctoral researcher in the Woodrow Wilson School at Princeton; and Yuheng Chen, an associate research scholar in geosciences at Princeton.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family: Arial, sans-serif;">Support for the research was provided in part by the <a title="http://www.princeton.edu/pei/" href="http://www.princeton.edu/pei/" target="_self"><span style="color: blue;">Princeton Environmental Institute</span></a>, the <a title="http://www.noaa.gov/wx.html" href="http://www.noaa.gov/wx.html" target="_self"><span style="color: blue;">National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration</span></a>, the <a title="http://www.nserc-crsng.gc.ca/" href="http://www.nserc-crsng.gc.ca/" target="_self"><span style="color: blue;">National Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada</span></a>, and the <a title="http://envirocenter.yale.edu/" href="http://envirocenter.yale.edu/" target="_self"><span style="color: blue;">Yale Center for Environmental Law and Policy</span></a>.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family: Arial, sans-serif;"><br />
See also:  <a title="/" href="http://www.FrackCheckWV.net"><span style="color: blue;">www.FrackCheckWV.net</span></a> </span></p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://www.frackcheckwv.net/2014/12/11/abandoned-wells-as-super-emitters-of-greenhouse-gas/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
