<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Frack Check WV &#187; heavy metals</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.frackcheckwv.net/tag/heavy-metals/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.frackcheckwv.net</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress site</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Mar 2024 22:41:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>IMAGINE Cleaning Up Coal Ash Impoundments to Benefit our Region!</title>
		<link>https://www.frackcheckwv.net/2022/06/02/imagine-cleaning-up-coal-ash-impoundments-to-benefit-our-region/</link>
		<comments>https://www.frackcheckwv.net/2022/06/02/imagine-cleaning-up-coal-ash-impoundments-to-benefit-our-region/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jun 2022 00:43:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Advocacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chemicals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EPA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Industry news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Study]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coal ash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[heavy metals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[KY]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OH]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ohio River]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[toxic waste]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US EPA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wv]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WV-PSC]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.frackcheckwv.net/?p=40725</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[New report on economic, environmental benefits of coal ash cleanup in Ohio River Valley From an Article by Mike Tony, Charleston Gazette Mail, October 13, 2021 PHOTO ~ Marion County native Jeremy Richardson, a senior energy analyst with the Union of Concerned Scientists, is pictured during an online event Wednesday touting the release of a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p><div id="attachment_40735" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 300px">
	<a href="https://www.frackcheckwv.net/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/2C6C6ACC-1195-4339-9DFB-A3989C6B76EC.jpeg"><img src="https://www.frackcheckwv.net/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/2C6C6ACC-1195-4339-9DFB-A3989C6B76EC-300x171.jpg" alt="" title="2C6C6ACC-1195-4339-9DFB-A3989C6B76EC" width="300" height="171" class="size-medium wp-image-40735" /></a>
	<p class="wp-caption-text">Jeremy Richardson ~ senior analyst at the Union of Concerned Scientists</p>
</div><strong>New report on economic, environmental benefits of coal ash cleanup in Ohio River Valley</strong></p>
<p>From an <a href="https://www.wvgazettemail.com/news/energy_and_environment/new-report-touts-economic-environmental-benefits-of-coal-ash-cleanup-in-ohio-river-valley/article_08ea1db7-a77b-5aa2-83f9-7e4d473c6f19.html">Article by Mike Tony, Charleston Gazette Mail</a>, October 13, 2021</p>
<p><strong>PHOTO</strong> ~ <strong>Marion County native Jeremy Richardson</strong>, a senior energy analyst with the Union of Concerned Scientists, is pictured during an online event Wednesday touting the release of a report he coauthored calling for full remediation of coal ash disposal sites in the Ohio River Valley. The analysis relies on public documents from utility closure plans, coal ash site conditions, economic modeling and alternative closure plan development.</p>
<p>Regional and national clean energy advocacy groups united Wednesday (10/13/21) to release a report suggesting that cleaning up hazardous coal ash in the Ohio River Valley could benefit the area economically as well as environmentally.</p>
<p>The new report “<a href="https://www.ucsusa.org/sites/default/files/2021-10/repairing-the-damage-report_0.pdf">Repairing the Damage ~ Cleaning Up Hazardous Coal Ash Can Create Jobs and Improve the Environment</a>” makes the case that fully remediating coal ash disposal sites would create more jobs and protect communities as more coal plants close in the region amid the nation’s clean energy transition.</p>
<p><strong>The economic analysis from the Union of Concerned Scientists, a national science advocacy nonprofit, and the Ohio River Valley Institute, a Johnstown, Pennsylvania-based nonprofit think tank, cited case studies of two coal ash sites in Kentucky and Ohio finding that full remediation of the sites would create more than $100 million in additional economic activity in each state.</strong></p>
<p>“My excitement about the report is because you just have so much of an opportunity to create so much benefit to the people in the communities that we’re talking about,” said Marion County native Jeremy Richardson, a senior energy analyst with the Union of Concerned Scientists who coauthored the report.</p>
<p>Those communities are economically vulnerable coal communities where coal ash — waste left behind when coal is burned to produce electricity — is a common threat to human health.</p>
<p><strong>Approximately 102 million tons of coal ash was produced in 2018 alone, according to the American Coal Ash Association, an organization that promotes the environmentally responsible use of coal ash as an alternative to disposal.</strong></p>
<p><strong>Coal ash contains contaminants like arsenic, cadmium, chromium and selenium associated with cancer, heart disease, liver and kidney damage. Coal ash is frequently disposed of in surface impoundments or landfills or released into nearby waterways, often under a plant’s water pollution permit.</strong></p>
<p>The analysis notes that more than one out of every five coal ash disposal sites nationwide can be found at operating or retired coal-fired power plants in West Virginia, Kentucky, Ohio, Pennsylvania and Indiana.</p>
<p>The report calls for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency to strengthen its enforcement of a 2015 rule that established closure requirements for coal ash disposal sites under the federal Resource Conservation and Recovery Act and finalized minimum criteria for groundwater monitoring and corrective action.</p>
<p>The report emphasizes holding utilities and coal ash disposal site owners responsible for fully remediating such sites. “[R]atepayers should not bear the costs without reaping the economic value of full cleanup,” the report says.</p>
<p><strong>The WV Public Service Commission on Tuesday approved $448.3 million in rate recovery for Appalachian Power and Wheeling Power for coal ash disposal and other environmental upgrades federally required to keep three in-state coal-fired power plants operating past 2028.</strong></p>
<p><strong>The report also calls for prioritizing dislocated workers in hiring. Representatives from the Ohio River Valley Institute, nonprofit environmental law group EarthJustice, left-leaning nonprofit think tank Policy Matters Ohio and the ReImagine Appalachia coalition of environmental and community organizations across the region highlighted the report in a press conference and webinar Wednesday.</strong></p>
<p>“Pollution cleanup is essential to ensuring that these areas become places where people can safely live and work,” Amanda Woodrum, senior researcher with Policy Matters Ohio, said.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://www.frackcheckwv.net/2022/06/02/imagine-cleaning-up-coal-ash-impoundments-to-benefit-our-region/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Extended Exposure to Toxic Coal Ash Involves Death of Workers and Ongoing Law Suits</title>
		<link>https://www.frackcheckwv.net/2022/05/31/extended-exposure-to-toxic-coal-ash-involves-death-of-workers-and-ongoing-law-suits/</link>
		<comments>https://www.frackcheckwv.net/2022/05/31/extended-exposure-to-toxic-coal-ash-involves-death-of-workers-and-ongoing-law-suits/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2022 19:00:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Advocacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chemicals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Events]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Industry news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coal ash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[heavy metals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lung disease]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OH]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[radioactive particles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wv]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.frackcheckwv.net/?p=40701</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Coal ash workers dying as lawsuit over illnesses drags on From an Article by Travis Liller, AP News, May 30, 2022 NASHVILLE, Tenn. (AP) — In 2013, the first of more than 200 workers who labored to clean up the nation’s worst coal ash spill filed a suit against the contractor, blaming Jacobs Engineering for [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p><div id="attachment_40703" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 300px">
	<a href="https://www.frackcheckwv.net/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/8A7FE413-567C-4616-BC06-13F99CDC1AC8.jpeg"><img src="https://www.frackcheckwv.net/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/8A7FE413-567C-4616-BC06-13F99CDC1AC8-300x200.jpg" alt="" title="Coal Ash Illnesses" width="300" height="200" class="size-medium wp-image-40703" /></a>
	<p class="wp-caption-text">Memorial to workers of coal ash cleanup in Kingston, TN</p>
</div><strong>Coal ash workers dying as lawsuit over illnesses drags on</strong></p>
<p>From an <a href="https://apnews.com/article/politics-tennessee-climate-and-environment-lawsuits-25b8545c8198e1fe034ce340b1989ad1">Article by Travis Liller, AP News</a>, May 30, 2022</p>
<p>NASHVILLE, Tenn. (AP) — In 2013, the first of more than 200 workers who labored to clean up the nation’s worst coal ash spill filed a suit against the contractor, blaming Jacobs Engineering for illnesses they believe were caused by exposure to heavy metals and radioactive particles in the ash. Nearly a decade later, not a single case has made it through the court system.</p>
<p>As the cases drag on, dozens who believed their work for the contractor made them sick have died.</p>
<p>They include people like Ansol Clark, who arrived at the Tennessee Valley Authority’s Kingston Fossil Plant just hours after the Dec. 22, 2008, spill, and got to work. He labored long hours in the coal ash sludge with few or no days off for months at a time until he became too sick to work in 2013. He died last year from a rare blood cancer that he believed was caused by exposure to the ash.</p>
<p>“Ansol never lived to see any justice,” his wife of almost 50 years, Janie Clark, said. “He never did — on earth.”</p>
<p>Over the years, Jacobs has made repeated attempts to have the suits thrown out. The Tennessee Supreme Court is scheduled to hear oral arguments on Wednesday in Jacob’s latest challenge to the workers’ lawsuits. The company wants a judge to dismiss most of the plaintiffs for failing to follow a procedure outlined in the Tennessee Silica Claims Priorities Act.</p>
<p>The law requires anyone pursuing claims for exposure to silica or mixed dust to file a doctor’s report concluding that the exposure is a “substantial contributing factor” to the patient’s illness. For plaintiffs bringing wrongful death claims on behalf of a loved one, they must also show the worker was exposed to the dust for at least five years. Workers with lung cancer are subject to the five-year provision too and additionally must show that their cancer was diagnosed at least 10 years after their first exposure to the dust.</p>
<p>In court filings, Jacobs said the vast majority of plaintiffs either didn’t file the doctor reports, filed inadequate reports, or didn’t meet the time restrictions. For example, one worker died from lung cancer in 2015, less than seven years after the spill, so should not be allowed to sue, according to Jacobs.</p>
<p>Attorneys for the workers argue the silica law was never meant to apply to cases like theirs. The act specifically refers to silica, which is just one component of coal ash. The components they believe caused the worker injuries include arsenic, lead, cadmium, mercury and radium, but not silica. The law also refers to claims for very specific injuries — silicosis and pulmonary fibrosis — that are not at issue in this case.</p>
<p>In addition, the workers’ attorneys say it is simply too late to bring this challenge. The case already went through the first part of a two-part trial in 2018, when a Knoxville, Tennessee, jury found that Jacobs breached its duty of care to the workers. The jurors said Jacobs’ actions were capable of making the workers sick. Whether those actions actually did make them sick, and thus eligible for monetary damages, was left for a subsequent trial or trials.</p>
<p>Jacobs’ attorneys have said the company did its best to manage the cleanup in a way regulators said was safe. It has not been proven that Jacobs — or even coal ash — is to blame for any illnesses, and the EPA classifies coal ash as nonhazardous.</p>
<p>After the 2018 trial, the federal judge in the case ordered mediation, alluding to workers’ urgent need for medical care. Mediation was unsuccessful, but a new trial date has not been set as Jacobs continues to pursue legal challenges. Twice, the company has asked the 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals to find that it is immune from being sued because it was acting on behalf of the Tennessee Valley Authority, a federal agency. The court has ruled against Jacobs both times, most recently this month.</p>
<p>Doug Bledsoe didn’t live to see that small victory. Bledsoe was called to work at Kingston just days after the 2008 collapse of a six-story earthen dam released more than a billion gallons of coal ash sludge. The spill was so massive it knocked nearby homes off their foundations. As the sludge slowly dried over the yearslong course of the cleanup, it turned into a fine dust that had to be constantly watered down but still filled the air, especially on windy days, according to trial testimony.</p>
<p>Bledsoe drove a water truck there until 2014. In 2018, he was diagnosed with lung and brain cancer. He died two years later, leaving behind his wife of 38 years, Johnnie Bledsoe. The two began dating when she was 14 and Doug Bledsoe was her “whole world,” she said.</p>
<p>“Everything we done, we done together,” Johnnie Bledsoe said. “We raised cattle together. We had a farm together. All that’s stopped.” Last year Johnnie Bledsoe and Janie Clark received an American flag that had flown over the U.S. Capitol to honor the coal ash cleanup workers. Clark said it is the only official acknowledgement they have received of the suffering they’ve endured.</p>
<p>Before he died Ansol Clark built a wooden cross that he placed near the Kingston plant as a memorial to the workers. Janie Clark said she plans to go there this weekend to change the flowers, as she does regularly.</p>
<p>“I’ll be doing that as long as I can get up the hill,” Clark said. “I do not intend to let this be forgotten.”</p>
<p>>>>>>>>…………………>>>>>>>…………………>>>>>>></p>
<p><strong>See Also:</strong> <a href="https://www.nrdc.org/onearth/coal-ash-hazardous-coal-ash-waste-according-epa-coal-ash-not-hazardous-waste">Coal Ash Is Hazardous. Coal Ash Is Waste. But According to the EPA, Coal Ash Is Not “Hazardous Waste”</a> ~ Jeff Turrentine, NRDC On Earth, September 6, 2019</p>
<p>Coal ash, a catchall term for several kinds of waste left over at power plants that burn coal, typically contains a number of substances harmful to human health—arsenic, chromium, lead, and mercury among them. Coal ash is incredibly dangerous. Short-term exposure can bring irritation of the nose and throat, dizziness, nausea, vomiting, and shortness of breath. Long-term exposure can lead to liver damage, kidney damage, cardiac arrhythmia, and a variety of cancers. Every year hundreds of American coal plants generate about 110 million tons of the stuff. Most of it gets mixed with water and stored in sludgy basins commonly known as coal ash ponds, which have an unfortunate tendency to leak or flood or spill, sometimes in catastrophic amounts.</p>
<p>A few days before Christmas in 2008, more than a billion gallons of coal ash slurry poured out of a Kingston, Tennessee, power plant, spilling into local waterways and swamping 15 homes after the six-story earthen dam that had been containing it collapsed. The incident remains, to this day, the largest industrial spill in American history. More than 900 workers were quickly dispatched to clean up the mess, a massive effort that took five years. When those same workers began to get sick and even die under conditions that strongly suggested coal ash poisoning, 200 of them sued the contractor that had employed them, alleging that they had been greatly misled about the dangers of their exposure. A Tennessee jury last November found that the contractor had indeed jeopardized the health of its workers through its actions, but the case is ongoing, and no monetary damages have yet been paid.</p>
<p>Despite the protests of many whose lives have been affected by this demonstrably toxic substance, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency has for years refused to classify coal ash as hazardous waste. Instead, the agency continues to regard coal ash as solid waste — the same designation, believe it or not, given to household garbage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://www.frackcheckwv.net/2022/05/31/extended-exposure-to-toxic-coal-ash-involves-death-of-workers-and-ongoing-law-suits/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>WV Legislature Will Need a Special Session to Complete Marcellus Landfill Regulations</title>
		<link>https://www.frackcheckwv.net/2014/03/11/wv-legislature-will-need-a-special-session-to-complete-marcellus-landfill-regulations/</link>
		<comments>https://www.frackcheckwv.net/2014/03/11/wv-legislature-will-need-a-special-session-to-complete-marcellus-landfill-regulations/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2014 20:02:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Duane Nichols</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Advocacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chemicals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DEP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Industry news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Study]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drill cuttings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drilling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drinking water]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fracking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[heavy metals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[landfills]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[leachate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marcellus shale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pollution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[radioactivity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solid waste]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[toxic chemicals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WV Legislature]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frackcheckwv.net/?p=11244</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Fracking Waste Disposal Still A Question Article by Glynis Board and Ashton Marra, WV Public Broadcasting, March 10, 2014 The House and Senate have spent weeks working on House Bill 4411 dealing with the disposal of hydraulic fracturing drill cuttings in land fills. Earlier in the session, the House of Delegates held a public hearing [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p><a href="/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/Drill-Cuttings-Lisby-Pad.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-11245" title="Drill Cuttings - Lisby Pad" src="/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/Drill-Cuttings-Lisby-Pad-300x240.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="240" /></a><strong>Fracking Waste Disposal Still A Question</strong></p>
<p><a title="Fracking Waste Disposal Still a Question in WV" href="http://wvpublic.org/post/fracking-waste-disposal-still-question" target="_blank">Article by Glynis Board and Ashton Marra</a>, WV Public Broadcasting, March 10, 2014<strong></strong></p>
<p>The House and Senate have spent weeks working on House Bill 4411 dealing with the disposal of<a title="http://wvpublic.org/post/horizontal-gas-drilling-waste-what-it-what-do-we-do-about-it" href="http://wvpublic.org/post/horizontal-gas-drilling-waste-what-it-what-do-we-do-about-it"> hydraulic fracturing drill cuttings </a>in land fills. Earlier in the session, the House of Delegates held a <a title="http://wvpublic.org/post/listen-voices-frack-waste-hearing-tell-story" href="http://wvpublic.org/post/listen-voices-frack-waste-hearing-tell-story">public hearing</a> on the issue. But members could not agree on the terms of the bill and late Saturday evening it ended up in a conference committee.</p>
<p>The conference agreement came down to this: landfills who want to accept drill cuttings from fracking sites must apply for permits from the Department of Environmental Protection and the Public Service Commission. So far, seven are in the process of doing so.</p>
<p>Those seven would be the only landfills allowed to apply for the permits for two years. They must put radon detectors at their front gates to test trucks, cannot mix the drill cuttings with municipal waste and must charge a $1 fee per ton they accept. The first $750 thousand collected will go toward a study on the waste due to the Joint Committee on Government and Finance next year.</p>
<p>That agreement, however, did not make it to the clerks&#8217; desks in time to be put to a vote and the bill died, leaving no legislative restrictions on these cuttings and their disposal.</p>
<p>See also the very informative <a title="Video Clip from WV Public Broadcasting" href="http://wvpublic.org/post/fracking-waste-disposal-still-question" target="_blank">Video Clip in this Article</a>.</p>
<p>&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;</p>
<p><strong>W.Va. bill to regulate gas drilling waste on hold</strong></p>
<p>From an Article of the Associated Press (Charleston Gazette), March 10, 2014</p>
<p>CHARLESTON, W.Va. &#8212; A bill to regulate the disposal of waste produced by gas-well drilling will likely be introduced by West Virginia Gov. Earl Ray Tomblin in a special session. Lawmakers who negotiated a version both sides could agree on were unable to get the measure passed before midnight Saturday, the deadline for the regular session.</p>
<p>The bill would allow only seven landfills in West Virginia that have already applied to do so to create a separate area on their properties where they could store the waste. Those landfills are located in the Northern Panhandle and Northwest portion of the state.</p>
<p>Sen. Herb Snyder, D-Jefferson, said the bill is a huge environmental protection for the state. As it stands, the measure calls for drillings to be separated from other waste and monitored for radioactivity. &#8220;By September of this year, the waste cannot be mixed with other trash and must be put in a separate cell, and radioactivity monitors add a tremendous amount of protection over what is being done today,&#8221; said Snyder. &#8220;We have learned a lot by looking at what was done in Pennsylvania and looking at the problems they were having.&#8217; Snyder said the studies will examine what types of metals are in the waste in addition to their level of radioactivity.</p>
<p>Currently, in depth studies on drilling waste have not been conducted in West Virginia. Snyder said some Department of Environmental Protection studies were conducted after the Natural Gas Horizontal Well Act; however, the Legislature determined these studies were incomplete and not sufficient, he said.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://www.frackcheckwv.net/2014/03/11/wv-legislature-will-need-a-special-session-to-complete-marcellus-landfill-regulations/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
