<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Frack Check WV &#187; green completion</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.frackcheckwv.net/tag/green-completion/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.frackcheckwv.net</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress site</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Mar 2024 22:41:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>U.S. Needs Strong Greenhouse Gas Standards (GHG Tailoring Rule)</title>
		<link>https://www.frackcheckwv.net/2012/04/17/u-s-needs-strong-greenhouse-gas-standards-ghg-tailoring-rule/</link>
		<comments>https://www.frackcheckwv.net/2012/04/17/u-s-needs-strong-greenhouse-gas-standards-ghg-tailoring-rule/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 02:53:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Duane Nichols</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drilling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flares]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fracking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[green completion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[greenhouse gases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marcellus shale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[natural gas]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frackcheckwv.net/?p=4671</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The US EPA is proposing Step 3 of the Greenhouse Gas Tailoring Rule, originally designed to cut industrial emissions that harm public health and cause climate change by gradually tightening pollutant standards over time. This most recent step may be in the wrong direction. It allows the same greenhouse gas standards as before rather than [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p><a href="/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/Clean-Air-Council.bmp"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-4672" title="Clean Air Council" src="/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/Clean-Air-Council.bmp" alt="" /></a></p>
<p>The US EPA is proposing Step 3 of the Greenhouse Gas Tailoring Rule, originally designed to cut industrial emissions that harm public health and cause climate change by gradually tightening pollutant standards over time. This most recent step may be in the wrong direction. It allows the same greenhouse gas standards as before rather than lowering them while building in streamlining measures for industry. This rule will have major ramifications for whether or not the natural gas industry is properly regulated. Hopefully the US EPA will stand up for human health and the environment over industry’s bottom line. You may wish to provide comments.</p>
<p>The Clean Air Council is a member-supported, non-profit environmental organization founded in 1967 and dedicated to protecting everyone&#8217;s right to breathe clean air. The Council works through public education, community advocacy, and government oversight to seek enforcement of environmental laws. Here is a message from the Clean Air Council:</p>
<p><a title="http://salsa.democracyinaction.org/o/1152/p/dia/action/public/?action_KEY=10212" href="http://salsa.democracyinaction.org/o/1152/p/dia/action/public/?action_KEY=10212">Ask EPA for Stronger Greenhouse Gas Standards</a></p>
<p>The deadline for commenting is Friday, April 20<sup>th</sup> at 5 pm.</p>
<p><strong>Matt Walker, </strong>Clean Air Council, <em>Community Outreach Coordinator, Marcellus Shale Program, </em>215-567-4004 ext. 121, <a title="mailto:mwalker@cleanair.org" href="mailto:mwalker@cleanair.org">mwalker@cleanair.org</a></p>
<p>Website: <a title="http://www.cleanair.org/" href="http://www.cleanair.org/">www.cleanair.org</a></p>
<p>&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;</p>
<p>Some drillers say that the costs of pending air pollution standards are manageable, <a title="Air Emissions Rule is Manageable" href="http://www.businessweek.com/news/2012-04-17/drillers-say-costs-manageable-from-pending-gas-emissions-rule" target="_blank">according to Business Week</a>.  The US EPA proposal to cut air pollution from natural-gas wells, that was delayed after a flurry of last-minute comments, won’t slow the gas boom sweeping the U.S., some drillers and industry analysts said.</p>
<p><em>Southwestern Energy Co. and Devon Energy Corp. say they already use systems to capture methane and other fumes at wells, the key requirement of a rule that may be issued very soon. Drilling hasn’t slowed in Colorado or Wyoming where technology to capture emissions has been required by the state since 2009 and 2010, Christine Tezak, senior policy analyst at Robert W. Baird &amp; Co. in McLean, Virginia, wrote in a March 16 research note.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://www.frackcheckwv.net/2012/04/17/u-s-needs-strong-greenhouse-gas-standards-ghg-tailoring-rule/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>EPA Proposes New Air Pollution Regulations for ONG Industry</title>
		<link>https://www.frackcheckwv.net/2011/07/29/epa-proposes-new-air-pollution-regulations-for-ong-industry/</link>
		<comments>https://www.frackcheckwv.net/2011/07/29/epa-proposes-new-air-pollution-regulations-for-ong-industry/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2011 07:48:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dee Fulton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[air pollution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[air regulations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drilling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[epa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fracing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fracking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[green completion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HAPs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hydraulic fracturing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marcellus shale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[methane]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[natural gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[proposed amendments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VOCs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frackcheckwv.net/?p=2587</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Some very exciting news just came out of the EPA.   In Ken Ward Jr.&#8217;s blog, Sustained Outrage, there is a July 28 post that informs us that the EPA just released Proposed Amendments to Air Regulations for the Oil and Natural Gas Industry (ONG).  An 8-page  Fact Sheet on the document is available on [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><div id="attachment_2588" class="wp-caption alignright" style="width: 150px">
	<a href="/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/flaring.jpg"><img class="size-thumbnail wp-image-2588" title="flaring" src="/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/flaring-150x150.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="150" /></a>
	<p class="wp-caption-text">Gas flaring could be eliminated in most cases under proposed regulations. Photo courtesy of GreenPacks.</p>
</div>
<p>Some very exciting news just came out of the EPA.   In Ken Ward Jr.&#8217;s blog, Sustained Outrage, there is a July 28 post that informs us that the EPA just released Proposed Amendments to Air Regulations for the Oil and Natural Gas Industry (ONG).  An 8-page  <a href="http://www.epa.gov/airquality/oilandgas/pdfs/20110728factsheet.pdf" target="_blank">Fact Sheet</a> on the document is available on the EPA website.   Generally, the proposed changes fall into one of four categories: reducing volatile organic compound (VOC) emissions, reducing sulfur dioxide emissions, revising the air toxics standards (to reduce cancer risk and other ill health impacts) from oil and natural gas production and revising air toxic standards to reduce risk of health impacts from natural gas transmission and storage.   The EPA will accept public comment for 60 days after publication in the Federal Register.  Final action must be taken by the EPA by Feb. 28, 2012.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s the very distilled recap :</p>
<p><strong>REDUCING VOC EMISSIONS</strong> During the flowback stage of well completion, fracturing fluids, high-salinity water and gas come to the surface at a high velocity and volume.  Flaring is employed to burn off the gas during this gushing phase until the majority of the liquid and solid contaminants have been forced out by the pressures generated by the fracking process, the gas flows more purely, and is then collected and treated.</p>
<p>Much methane is lost during flowback and flaring, and other VOCs and hazardous air pollutants (HAPs) such as benzene, ethylbenzene and n-hexane are also released.  Raw natural gas is primarily composed of methane, a VOC and greenhouse gas which is 20 times as potent in greenhouse effect as carbon dioxide. Oil and natural gas production accounts for nearly 40% of all US methane emissions. VOCs contribute to the formation of ground-level ozone (smog).</p>
<p>The <a href="http://nepis.epa.gov/Exe/ZyNET.exe/P100B4ME.txt?ZyActionD=ZyDocument&amp;Client=EPA&amp;Index=2006%20Thru%202010&amp;Docs=&amp;Query=430R11011%20or%20gas%20or%20lost%20or%20flaring%20or%20EPA&amp;Time=&amp;EndTime=&amp;SearchMethod=1&amp;TocRestrict=n&amp;Toc=&amp;TocEntry=&amp;QField=pubnumber%5E%22430R11011%22&amp;QFieldYear=&amp;QFieldMonth=&amp;QFieldDay=&amp;UseQField=pubnumber&amp;IntQFieldOp=1&amp;ExtQFieldOp=1&amp;XmlQuery=&amp;File=D%3A%5CZYFILES%5CINDEX%20DATA%5C06THRU10%5CTXT%5C00000027%5CP100B4ME.txt&amp;User=ANONYMOUS&amp;Password=anonymous&amp;SortMethod=h%7C-&amp;MaximumDocuments=10&amp;FuzzyDegree=0&amp;ImageQuality=r75g8/r75g8/x150y150g16/i425&amp;Display=p%7Cf&amp;DefSeekPage=x&amp;SearchBack=ZyActionL&amp;Back=ZyActionS&amp;BackDesc=Results%20page&amp;MaximumPages=1&amp;ZyEntry=2" target="_blank">green completion process, also known as Reduced Emissions Completions</a>, is a technology which captures gas which would otherwise be lost during well completion and puts it into the production line so that it can be treated and sold.</p>
<p>Interestingly, employing the green emission technology results in <strong>sizable savings</strong> to the natural gas industry.   The EPA estimates the net savings to industry through application of the proposed rule would be<strong> nearly $30 million annually</strong>.  (One seriously wonders why it takes a federal law to force an industry to employ technology that not only raises net revenue, but also reduces public health risks.)</p>
<p>EPA estimates that the use of green completion technology will reduce VOC emissions from hydraulic fracturing by almost 95%, methane being one of the VOCs.  VOCs across the ONG industry are expected to fall by nearly 25% if the proposals are implemented.  Wyoming and Colorado already require green completions.</p>
<p>Other equipment proposals: 1)Centrifugal compressors would have to be equipped with dry seal systems.  Reciprocating compressors would have to replace rod systems every 26,000 hours.  2)  The proposed regulations would require that new or replaced pneumatic controllers be driven by a non-gas power source.  3) Condensate tanks which handle a certain volume of condensate or crude oil must reduce VOC emissions by 95%.  4) Natural gas processing plants must strengthen leak detection an repair.</p>
<p><strong>SULPHUR DIOXIDE</strong> Stronger source performance standards for sulfur dioxide would be required for plants processing gas with the highest sulfur dioxide content.  (Sulphur dioxide standards were issued in 1985.)</p>
<p><strong>REDUCING CANCER RISK/HEALTH IMPACTS </strong>(for both ONG production and natural gas transmission and storage) All large dehydrators would have to reduce emissions of air toxics (such as benzene) by 95%.  Emissions standards would be established for small dehydrators at major sources.  The proposed regulations are expected to reduce emissions of air toxics by 30%.</p>
<p><strong>BACKGROUND </strong>The Clean Air Act (CAA) requires a review every 8 years for  new source performance standards (NSPS) for industries that contribute to air pollution which endangers public health.  The existing NSPD for VOCs were issued in 1985.  You do the math. A similar story can be told about air toxics standards.  The CAA requires a one-time review after a standard is issued to find out what risks remain and whether or not more protective standards are needed.  The CAA also requires technical review every 8 years to identify better emission control technologies.  Both the standards for ONG production and those for natural gas transmission and storage were issued in 1999.  Environmental groups sued the EPA in Jan. 2009 for failing to review the NSPS.  The U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. District entered a consent decree in Feb. 2010 that required the EPA to sign proposals related to the review of those standards by July 28, 2011 and issue final standards by Feb. 28, 2012.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://www.frackcheckwv.net/2011/07/29/epa-proposes-new-air-pollution-regulations-for-ong-industry/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
