<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Frack Check WV &#187; fines</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.frackcheckwv.net/tag/fines/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.frackcheckwv.net</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress site</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Mar 2024 22:41:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Frack Fluid Spill$ in Greene County Result in Penna. Fine$</title>
		<link>https://www.frackcheckwv.net/2022/11/20/frack-fluid-spill-in-greene-county-result-in-penna-fine/</link>
		<comments>https://www.frackcheckwv.net/2022/11/20/frack-fluid-spill-in-greene-county-result-in-penna-fine/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Nov 2022 22:22:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Accidents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chemicals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DEP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Events]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Industry news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CNX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drilling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fracking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PA-DEP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spills]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[water pollution]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.frackcheckwv.net/?p=42937</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[CNX fined $200K for spills of fracking fluids in Greene County, Penna. From an Article by Reid Frazier, Allegheny Front, November 17, 2022 The Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection has fined the natural gas drilling company CNX some $200,000 for spilling natural gas production fluids at well sites in Greene County, Pennsylvania. The spills took [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p><div id="attachment_42940" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 320px">
	<a href="https://www.frackcheckwv.net/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/955D1A74-5646-4DE9-82F2-B69FFDADCEFD.png"><img src="https://www.frackcheckwv.net/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/955D1A74-5646-4DE9-82F2-B69FFDADCEFD-300x180.png" alt="" title="955D1A74-5646-4DE9-82F2-B69FFDADCEFD" width="320" height="250" class="size-medium wp-image-42940" /></a>
	<p class="wp-caption-text">Fracking is a big deal where ever it occurs AND chemical spill$ can occur!!!</p>
</div><strong>CNX fined $200K for spills of fracking fluids in Greene County, Penna.</strong></p>
<p>From an <a href="https://www.alleghenyfront.org/cnx-fined-200k-for-spills-of-fracking-fluids-in-greene-county/">Article by Reid Frazier, Allegheny Front</a>, November 17, 2022</p>
<p>The Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection has fined the natural gas drilling company CNX some $200,000 for spilling natural gas production fluids at well sites in Greene County, Pennsylvania.</p>
<p>The spills took place between 2019 and 2021, all in Richhill Township. (Greene County is in the extreme southwest corner of Pennsylvania bordering West Virginia on the south and west.)</p>
<p>The <strong>largest spill took place on September 18, 2019</strong>, in which approximately 40 barrels, or 1,680 gallons, of production fluid leaked out of a containment structure and spilled on the ground at CNX RHL 71 and RHL 87 well site. </p>
<p>The PA-DEP said the company tried to make repairs to the containment and remove fluids from the site. But CNX “postponed full remediation nearly 70 days due to its ongoing hydraulic fracturing activities,” according to a PA-DEP press release. In total, the company had to remove nearly 1,400 tons of contaminated soil at the site. </p>
<p><strong>Another spill occurred at the site on January 23, 2021</strong>, in which 420 gallons of fluid discharged onto the ground due to an “equipment failure.” Another spill of 40 gallons occurred three months later. </p>
<p><strong>A smaller incident occurred in December 2019</strong>, in which 30 gallons of fluid leaked out of containment and into a sediment basin at the company’s RHL 4 well pad. According to the PA-DEP, “CNX postponed removal of contaminated soil until hydraulic fracturing was completed, and the discharge continued for days.” </p>
<p><strong>The company ended up removing nearly 2,000 tons of contaminated soil from the site. </strong></p>
<p>“Delays like these are unacceptable. PA-DEP expects, and the regulations require, prompt reporting and cleanup of spills and that operators will take measures to prevent future incidents,” said PA-DEP southwest district oil and gas manager Dan Counahan, in a statement. </p>
<p>Production fluids are a byproduct of the drilling and fracking process in oil and gas production. They can contain high levels of naturally-occurring metals, radioactive materials, and salts, but also can contain fracking chemicals. The fluid is too toxic for disposal in municipal wastewater facilities and is typically disposed of in deep injection wells. </p>
<p><strong>The company paid two fines, of $125,000 and $75,000, for the violations. The money will go toward the state’s fund to plug abandoned oil and gas wells.</strong> </p>
<p>>> This story is produced in partnership with StateImpact Pennsylvania, a collaboration among The Allegheny Front, WPSU, WITF and WHYY to cover the commonwealth&#8217;s energy economy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://www.frackcheckwv.net/2022/11/20/frack-fluid-spill-in-greene-county-result-in-penna-fine/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Multiple Violations and Fines Have Been Levied Against Marcellus Gas Operators</title>
		<link>https://www.frackcheckwv.net/2021/05/07/multiple-violations-and-fines-have-been-levied-against-marcellus-gas-operators/</link>
		<comments>https://www.frackcheckwv.net/2021/05/07/multiple-violations-and-fines-have-been-levied-against-marcellus-gas-operators/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 May 2021 22:26:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Duane Nichols</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Accidents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Advocacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chemicals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DEP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Events]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Industry news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Study]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drilling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drilling mud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fracking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marcellus shale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[natural gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pipelines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[safety risks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[violations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wastewater]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[water pollution]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frackcheckwv.net/?p=37307</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Natural gas investigations in PA lead to record fine, closed pipelines From an Article by Ad Crable, Bay Journal, 5/3/21 Pennsylvania’s robust natural gas industry has been embarrassed by three environmental scandals in 15 months. Among the fallout: temporarily closed pipelines, the state’s largest environmental fine, the elimination of streams, and the illegal burial or [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p><div id="attachment_37308" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 300px">
	<a href="/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/773FA789-273B-4FC5-BB2F-D91FEF152C46.jpeg"><img src="/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/773FA789-273B-4FC5-BB2F-D91FEF152C46-300x91.jpg" alt="" title="773FA789-273B-4FC5-BB2F-D91FEF152C46" width="300" height="91" class="size-medium wp-image-37308" /></a>
	<p class="wp-caption-text">Marcellus gas well pads &#038; wastewater impoundment in prime forest of north central Penna.</p>
</div><strong>Natural gas investigations in PA lead to record fine, closed pipelines</strong></p>
<p>From an <a href="https://www.bayjournal.com/news/pollution/natural-gas-investigations-in-pa-lead-to-record-fine-closed-pipelines/article_551ef3fa-ac68-11eb-acd6-2b035028a604.html/ ">Article by Ad Crable, Bay Journal</a>, 5/3/21</p>
<p>Pennsylvania’s robust natural gas industry has been embarrassed by three environmental scandals in 15 months. Among the fallout: temporarily closed pipelines, the state’s largest environmental fine, the elimination of streams, and the illegal burial or alteration of parts of 163 wetlands.</p>
<p>In one case, Texas gas company Range Resources was found to have classified spent gas wells as temporarily inactive, rather than closed, thus avoiding a requirement to plug the wells to prevent leaks of methane, a powerful greenhouse gas.</p>
<p>In another case, Chesapeake Appalachia, an arm of Chesapeake Energy and one of the largest fracking gas companies in Pennsylvania, signed a consent agreement March 24 with the U.S. Department of Justice, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection.</p>
<p>The agreement, which included a $1.9 million civil penalty, acknowledges that Chesapeake Appalachia had, according to its own reports, filled approximately 26 acres of wetlands with dirt, rock or sand, without state or federal authorization, at 76 of its gas wells across five counties.</p>
<p>The company will have to restore about 11 acres of affected wetlands. To compensate for the remaining 15 acres, which are irreparably damaged, the company must create twice that many acres of new wetlands nearby, ideally in the same watershed.</p>
<p>Chesapeake Appalachia’s record of the damage goes back to 2013, when the EPA and Justice Department fined the company $3.2 million for violations in West Virginia. The company agreed then that it had impounded and filled in 2.2 miles of streams and smothered portions of wetlands at 27 well pad sites without required federal permits from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. The violations were discovered by routine EPA inspections, complaints from nearby residents and reports from the gas company itself.</p>
<p>After that case and a management shake-up at the company, Chesapeake Energy did an internal audit of 500 gas well sites in Pennsylvania and informed state officials that it had discovered similar violations at 76 sites.</p>
<p>Gordon Pennoyer, a Chesapeake Energy spokesman, said of the enforcement action, “Having voluntarily disclosed these issues with the DEP and EPA seven years ago, we are pleased to resolve this legacy matter.”</p>
<p>Under federal regulations, Chesapeake has a choice of restoring violated wetlands or creating new ones elsewhere at double the amount destroyed. The company has submitted a plan to restore wetlands at some of the drilling sites, restore wetlands elsewhere to compensate for places where steep slopes prevent work at the original location, and conduct a combination of on-site and off-site work in some cases.</p>
<p>DEP Secretary Patrick McDonnell applauded Chesapeake Appalachia for coming forward with its violations and called the settlement a “significant benefit to Pennsylvania’s public natural resources” because it will result in an increase of wetlands in the Chesapeake Bay watershed.</p>
<p>Diana Esher, acting administrator of the EPA’s Mid-Atlantic region, said wetlands are “critical ecological and economic resources for all Pennsylvanians.”</p>
<p>The Chesapeake Appalachia penalties followed another high-profile case that concluded in early 2020, when a gas pipeline company was fined an unprecedented $30.6 million by the DEP, partly for widespread wetlands and stream violations.</p>
<p>The case against ETC Northeast Pipeline stemmed largely from a landslide that ruptured the one-week-old Revolution Pipeline in rural western Pennsylvania on Sept. 10, 2018. The blast from ignited natural gas burned one house, caused six power transmission poles to collapse, and destroyed two garages, a barn and several vehicles, as well as forced evacuations.</p>
<p>The DEP found that the company, an arm of Texas-based gas pipeline builder Energy Transfer Corp., used poor construction and oversight practices in building the pipeline. But an investigation after the blast uncovered more widespread environmental harms along the 40-mile pipeline.</p>
<p>According to the DEP, the company’s violations included 120 altered streams, 23 “eliminated” streams, 17 buried wetlands, 70 altered wetlands, 352 cases of erosion and sedimentation, 540 cases of sediment washing into streams, and 1,359 violations of required best management practices.</p>
<p>That laundry list of violations prompted the DEP to take the rare step of freezing pipeline permits for Energy Transfer Corp. subsidiaries, including that of the cross-state pipeline known as Mariner East 2.</p>
<p>That pipeline’s construction had already amassed a list of environmental violations, including sinkholes and 320 spills of drilling fluids. One spill into a central Pennsylvania lake cost Energy Transfer a $2 million fine.</p>
<p>“There has been a failure by Energy Transfer and its subsidiaries to respect our laws and our communities,” Gov. Tom Wolf said at the time of the Revolution Pipeline consent order. “This is not how we strive to do business in Pennsylvania, and it will not be tolerated.”</p>
<p>But after a one-year freeze, the DEP allowed Energy Transfer pipelines to resume or proceed with construction. The DEP ordered Energy Transfer to restore all wetlands and stream sections where possible. Seventy of the 87 damaged or destroyed wetlands will be restored. The other 17 harmed wetlands will be atoned for with the restoration of four times as much wetlands in the same watershed.</p>
<p>In a much smaller case, the DEP and Range Resources agreed in February to a consent order after the DEP found that the company was trying to avoid plugging spent gas wells as required. The agency fined Range Resources $294,000 and required plugging all but one of the 42 wells in question.</p>
<p>“Abandoned wells can be an extreme hazard to the health and safety of people and the environment,” said Jamar Thrasher, DEP spokesman. “That contributes to air, water and soil contamination, so it’s an environmental hazard.” Abandoned wells can leak methane, a potent greenhouse gas. These were conventional gas wells dating mostly from the 1980s or older, and not new fracking wells.</p>
<p>The company had filed paperwork with the DEP, mostly from 2012 to 2016, saying the wells were “inactive.” But an internal memo that Range sent to the DEP three weeks before paperwork was received on one well had reported that the well “was incapable of economic production.”</p>
<p>The DEP then investigated other wells and found 41 more that had been improperly classified.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://www.frackcheckwv.net/2021/05/07/multiple-violations-and-fines-have-been-levied-against-marcellus-gas-operators/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Range Resources Assessed $150,000 in Penalties for Violations at S.W. Penna. Marcellus Gas Well Pads</title>
		<link>https://www.frackcheckwv.net/2020/06/15/range-resources-assessed-150000-in-penalties-for-violations-at-s-w-penna-marcellus-gas-well-pads/</link>
		<comments>https://www.frackcheckwv.net/2020/06/15/range-resources-assessed-150000-in-penalties-for-violations-at-s-w-penna-marcellus-gas-well-pads/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2020 07:06:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Duane Nichols</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Accidents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Advocacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chemicals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DEP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Events]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Industry news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drilling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fracking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[holding ponds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[land disturbances]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marcellus shale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[natural gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[penalties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Range Resources]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[water pollution]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frackcheckwv.net/?p=32929</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Range Resources to pay $50,000 in fines and $100,000 in contributions for Washington County well violations From an Article by Deb Erdley, Pittsburgh Tribune Review, 6/12/20 Range Resources, a major driller in the region’s Marcellus Shale industry, pleaded no contest to two misdemeanor counts of negligent oversight of Washington County well sites and will pay [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p><div id="attachment_32931" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 300px">
	<a href="/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/A49BF9A7-988C-4F75-BC65-8521067699E3.jpeg"><img src="/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/A49BF9A7-988C-4F75-BC65-8521067699E3-300x200.jpg" alt="" title="Pennsylvania Attorney General Josh Shapiro" width="300" height="200" class="size-medium wp-image-32931" /></a>
	<p class="wp-caption-text">Penna. Attorney General Josh Shapiro</p>
</div><strong>Range Resources to pay $50,000 in fines and $100,000 in contributions for Washington County well violations</strong></p>
<p>From an <a href="https://triblive.com/local/regional/range-resources-to-pay-50000-in-fines-and-100000-in-contributions-for-washington-county-well-violations/">Article by Deb Erdley, Pittsburgh Tribune Review</a>, 6/12/20</p>
<p><strong>Range Resources, a major driller in the region’s Marcellus Shale industry, pleaded no contest to two misdemeanor counts of negligent oversight of Washington County well sites and will pay $50,000 in fines and $100,000 in contributions to the Washington County watershed funds, Pennsylvania Attorney General Josh Shapiro announced Friday.</strong></p>
<p>The plea was the culmination of a two-year statewide Grand Jury investigation into allegations of environmental crimes across the state by oil and gas companies companies engaged in horizontal drilling and fracking.</p>
<p><strong>The charges alleged that Range’s negligent maintenance of a waste water storage pond at the Yeager well site in Amwell Township contaminated the water at local springs on the Yeager property. The neighborhood’s longstanding battle over allegations of air and water contamination was detailed in “Amity and Prosperity,” the 2019 Pulitzer Prize winner for nonfiction.</strong></p>
<p><strong>Charges involving the Brownlee well site in Buffalo Township alleged that leaks from a containment tank holding fracking waste water contaminated nearly ⅓ acre of a nearby farm and required the removal of approximately 100 trees and 12,000 square feet of soil.</strong></p>
<p>“In Pennsylvania, clean air and pure water is a constitutional right, yet too often frackers from across the country come to our Commonwealth, walk into our communities, and — sometimes without care or consequence — strip us of those basic rights. Backed by big investors and big influence, too many fracking companies act like they’re above the law, and put themselves ahead of the people who work on the job site, as well as the farmer, neighbor, and children impacted by their operations. We’re here to remind these fracking companies that the people of Pennsylvania come first,” Shapiro said.</p>
<p>A spokesman for Range Resources said the company has taken responsibility for the incidents cited in the charges, has completed “full remediation, approved by regulators,” at both sites and has enhanced containment operations.</p>
<p>“Over the past decade, Range has led significant advancements in operational innovations that have enhanced the safety and sustainability of our industry, which include becoming the first company to voluntarily disclose our fracturing fluid, and to achieve 100 percent reuse levels through our water recycling program,” Range spokesman Mark Windle said.</p>
<p><strong>Terms of the pleas agreement call for Range to pay a $6,000 fine to the Solid Waste Abatement Fund, $3,000 to the Clean Water Fund, a $16,000 charitable contribution to the Washington County Watershed Alliance for the Brownlee site, $41,000 to the Solid Waste Abatement Fund, and an $84,000 charitable contribution to the Washington County Watershed Alliance for the Yeager site.</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://www.frackcheckwv.net/2020/06/15/range-resources-assessed-150000-in-penalties-for-violations-at-s-w-penna-marcellus-gas-well-pads/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rover Pipeline Construction Incurs Many Violations in Ohio</title>
		<link>https://www.frackcheckwv.net/2017/05/10/rover-pipeline-construction-incurs-many-violations-in-ohio/</link>
		<comments>https://www.frackcheckwv.net/2017/05/10/rover-pipeline-construction-incurs-many-violations-in-ohio/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 May 2017 05:05:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Accidents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Advocacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chemicals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DEP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Events]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Industry news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Study]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drilling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drillling mud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fracking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[leaks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rover Pipeline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spills]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[violations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[water pollution]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frackcheckwv.net/?p=19947</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ohio EPA orders Rover pipeline builder to pay $431,000 for violations From an Article by Marion Renault, The Columbus Dispatch, May 8, 2017 The Ohio Environmental Protection Agency has ordered Energy Transfer, the company building the Rover natural gas distribution pipeline, to pay $431,000 for water and air pollution violations at various locations across the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p><strong> </strong></p>
<div id="attachment_19949" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 300px">
	<a href="/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/Drilling-Mud-for-Rover-Pipeline-in-Ohio.jpg"><img class="size-medium wp-image-19949" title="$ - Drilling Mud for Rover Pipeline in Ohio" src="/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/Drilling-Mud-for-Rover-Pipeline-in-Ohio-300x168.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="168" /></a>
	<p class="wp-caption-text">Drilling mud spill on Rover Pipeline (See Video)</p>
</div>
<p><strong>Ohio EPA orders Rover pipeline builder to pay $431,000 for violations</strong></p>
<p><a title="Rover Pipeline Violations in Ohio" href="http://www.dispatch.com/news/20170508/ohio-epa-orders-rover-pipeline-builder-to-pay-431000-for-violations" target="_blank">From an Article</a> by <a title="mailto:mrenault@dispatch.com" href="mailto:mrenault@dispatch.com">Marion Renault</a>, The Columbus Dispatch, May 8, 2017</p>
<p>The Ohio Environmental Protection Agency has ordered Energy Transfer, the company building the Rover natural gas distribution pipeline, to pay $431,000 for water and air pollution violations at various locations across the state.</p>
<p>In its order issued Friday, OEPA also instructed Energy Transfer to submit plans to address potential future releases and restore impacted wetlands along the $4.2 billion underground pipeline <a title="https://www.google.com/maps/d/u/0/viewer?mid=1mhW6X6cMpx1SIYzWhBx7JKecmmk&amp;ll=40.513538169435165,-82.10687815&amp;z=8" href="https://www.google.com/maps/d/u/0/viewer?mid=1mhW6X6cMpx1SIYzWhBx7JKecmmk&amp;ll=40.513538169435165%2C-82.10687815&amp;z=8" target="_blank">route</a>, which stretches from Washington County in southeastern Ohio to Defiance County in the northwest.</p>
<p>Work on the pipeline began in mid-February, and state officials say a total of 18 incidents involving mud spills from drilling, stormwater pollution and open burning at Rover pipeline construction sites have been reported between late March and Monday to the agency.</p>
<p>That includes a 200-gallon release of mud Monday in Harrison County. Other Rover pipeline incidents include a spill that impacted one village’s public water system and another that smothered a protected wetland with several million gallons of bentonite mud, a natural clay which is used as a drilling lubricant.</p>
<p>“All told, our frustration is really high. We don’t think they’re taking Ohio seriously,” said OEPA Director Craig Butler. “Normally when we have &#8230; a series of events like this, companies respond with a whole lot of contrition and whole lot of commitment. We haven’t seen that. It’s pretty shocking.”</p>
<p>Alexis Daniel, an Energy Transfer spokeswoman, said Monday in an email statement that the “small number of inadvertent releases of ‘drilling mud’ during horizontal drilling in Ohio &#8230; is not an unusual occurrence when executing directional drilling operations and is all permitted activity by (the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission).</p>
<p>“We do not believe that there will be any impact to the environment,” Daniel said, adding that the company — the same one behind the controversial Dakota Access pipeline — is managing the Rover pipeline situation in accordance with its federal- and state-approved contingency plan.</p>
<p>After a <a title="http://www.dispatch.com/news/20170420/pipeline-construction-spill-sends-2-million-gallons-of-drilling-mud-into-two-ohio-wetlands" href="http://www.dispatch.com/news/20170420/pipeline-construction-spill-sends-2-million-gallons-of-drilling-mud-into-two-ohio-wetlands" target="_blank">pair of wetlands spills in April</a>, Energy Transfer still planned to finish the Rover project and begin operating the pipeline this year.</p>
<p>“I believe and have told them that they’re rushing and building so quickly that they’re not paying attention to best management practice,” said Butler. “With oil and gas expanding in Ohio, we’ve seen a lot of pipeline activity. We’re not unaccustomed to seeing an occasional release. “This is pretty systemic — that’s when the alarm bells go off in my head.”</p>
<p>Butler said the OEPA has referred the matter to the FERC for analysis and is exploring other legal options.</p>
<p>“It’s very concerning. These violations are a swath across our entire state,” said Cheryl Johncox, a <a title="http://content.sierraclub.org/press-releases/2017/05/energy-transfer-s-fracked-gas-pipeline-spills-six-times-two-weeks-has-seven#.WRCmR_OWVBg.twitter" href="http://content.sierraclub.org/press-releases/2017/05/energy-transfer-s-fracked-gas-pipeline-spills-six-times-two-weeks-has-seven#.WRCmR_OWVBg.twitter" target="_blank">Sierra Club </a>organizer. “We have no faith in their ability to operate a pipeline safely.”</p>
<p>OEPA inspectors across the state will continue to assist with monitoring, response and cleanup, Butler said.</p>
<p>But Sierra Club and other environmental groups are calling for the state to go further and seek an immediate injunction to shut down the project. Either this company is completely irresponsible or they just don’t care,” said Johncox. “We want the construction halted.”</p>
<p>Butler said the state “is limited in that we cannot ask them to shut down their operations. It’s a story left unfinished.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://www.frackcheckwv.net/2017/05/10/rover-pipeline-construction-incurs-many-violations-in-ohio/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hilcorp Alaska Pipeline Spewing Natural Gas Underwater for Weeks, Leaking Continues!</title>
		<link>https://www.frackcheckwv.net/2017/03/15/hilcorp-alaska-pipeline-spewing-natural-gas-underwater-for-weeks-leaking-continues/</link>
		<comments>https://www.frackcheckwv.net/2017/03/15/hilcorp-alaska-pipeline-spewing-natural-gas-underwater-for-weeks-leaking-continues/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Mar 2017 09:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Duane Nichols</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Accidents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Advocacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chemicals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Events]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Industry news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Study]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alaska]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employee risks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environmental impacts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[leaks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[natural gas pipeline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unsafe conditions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frackcheckwv.net/?p=19569</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Alaska underwater pipeline leak may have started in December 2016 From an Article by Dan Joling, Associated Press, March 7, 2017 ANCHORAGE, Alaska (AP) — A pipeline spewing natural gas into Alaska&#8217;s Cook Inlet may have started leaking in December, two months before the leak was spotted from the air, according to a federal pipeline safety [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p><strong> </strong></p>
<div id="attachment_19579" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 300px">
	<a href="/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/Alaska-pipeline-Cook-Inlet.jpg"><img class="size-medium wp-image-19579" title="$ - Alaska pipeline Cook Inlet" src="/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/Alaska-pipeline-Cook-Inlet-300x195.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="195" /></a>
	<p class="wp-caption-text">Time to shut-out all these pipelines</p>
</div>
<p><strong>Alaska underwater pipeline leak may have started in December 2016</strong></p>
<p>From an <a href="http://bigstory.ap.org/article/81cc24dd5195459497f1be530d5bdb56/alaska-underwater-pipeline-leak-may-have-started-december">Article by Dan Joling</a>, Associated Press, March 7, 2017</p>
<p>ANCHORAGE, Alaska (AP) — A pipeline spewing natural gas into Alaska&#8217;s Cook Inlet may have started leaking in December, two months before the leak was spotted from the air, according to a federal pipeline safety office.</p>
<p>The estimate of when gas started leaking into winter habitat for the endangered Cook Inlet beluga whales was issued in a proposed safety order last week by the U.S. Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration that the agency confirmed on Tuesday.</p>
<p>Processed natural gas continues to leak from a Hilcorp Alaska LLC pipeline that supplies four oil platforms in the inlet south of Anchorage — at a rate estimated by the company of 210,000 to 310,000 cubic feet of gas daily.</p>
<p>A Hilcorp helicopter crew February 7th spotted gas bubbling to the surface about four miles off shore.</p>
<p>However, the company in late January reported that it had detected increased gas flow through the pipeline in January and started looking for a leak, according pipeline safety office&#8217;s report.</p>
<p>A subsequent analysis of gas flow indicated the pipeline likely began leaking in December, the agency said. The agency late Friday issued the proposed safety order requiring the line to be repaired by May 1 or shut down.</p>
<p>Hilcorp has 30 days to respond. In a statement Tuesday afternoon, company spokeswoman Lori Nelson said the safety of response personnel is the company&#8217;s top priority. She said Hilcorp is pleased that the proposed safety order recognizes that immediate repair is not viable.</p>
<p>The pipeline is in 80 feet of water. Repairs by divers cannot be made in current winter conditions that include sea ice, severe weather and extreme tides, according to Hilcorp. The company told the federal pipeline office safe diving operations cannot start until late March at the earliest.</p>
<p>Shutting the gas pipeline down is not an option, Hilcorp said. Before the pipeline carried natural gas, it moved crude oil. Without pressure in the line, seawater could enter and allow residual crude oil to leak, the company said.</p>
<p>Hilcorp purchased the pipeline and other oil and gas facilities from XTO Energy, Inc., in September 2015. The 8-inch line also leaked in June and August 2014. The leaks were 42 yards apart about two-thirds of a mile from the current leak. They were repaired with clamps.</p>
<p>XTO Energy concluded that previous leaks were caused by rocks contacting the pipe in locations where the line was not continuously supported by seabed.</p>
<p>Annual side-scan sonar or multi-beam echo-sounder surveys conducted by the company do not detect external loads on the pipe, eroded pipe, rock impingements, metal loss, dings or gouges, the federal pipeline office said. The agency called for creating modifications to the pipe to allow in-line inspections or alternative technologies.</p>
<p>Besides endangered beluga whales, Cook Inlet is home to salmon and other fish. Hilcorp last week said its modeling consultants conclude that only tiny amounts of natural gas likely are dissolving into the water.</p>
<p>The company said Tuesday that based on observations so far, the natural gas release does not pose a threat to the public or the environment.</p>
<p>In a letter Tuesday to the Trump administration, however, seven environmental groups strongly disagreed. They called for the federal pipeline safety office to issue an emergency order shutting down the line. The leak is creating a low-oxygen dead zone that threatens belugas and other wildlife, the groups said.</p>
<p>&#8220;This dangerous leak could stop immediately if regulators did their job and shut down this rickety old pipeline,&#8221; said Miyoko Sakashita of the Center for Biological Diversity. Her group is one of two that have given formal notice that they intend to sue Hilcorp Alaska over the leak.</p>
<p>Hilcorp faces issues elsewhere in Alaska.</p>
<p>The Alaska Oil and Gas Conservation Commission, which oversees oil and gas drilling and production on state and private lands, last week fined Hilcorp $200,000 for unsafe practices in September 2015 at the Milne Point oil field northwest of Prudhoe Bay.</p>
<p>The commission said the company without authorization used nitrogen to clean a well. The gas entered an enclosed &#8220;mud trailer&#8221; with three workers inside and &#8220;nothing but luck&#8221; prevented their deaths, according to the commission.</p>
<p>Hilcorp in a statement said it has taken steps to make sure similar incidents don&#8217;t happen in the future.</p>
<p>See also: <a title="FrackCheckWV.net" href="http://www.FrackCheckWV.net" target="_blank">www.FrackCheckWV.net</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://www.frackcheckwv.net/2017/03/15/hilcorp-alaska-pipeline-spewing-natural-gas-underwater-for-weeks-leaking-continues/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gas Well Driller Cited With Repeat OSHA Violations in Harrison County</title>
		<link>https://www.frackcheckwv.net/2011/08/07/gas-well-driller-cited-with-repeat-osha-violations-in-harrison-county/</link>
		<comments>https://www.frackcheckwv.net/2011/08/07/gas-well-driller-cited-with-repeat-osha-violations-in-harrison-county/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Aug 2011 12:50:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Duane Nichols</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[citations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deaths]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drilling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fracking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[injuries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marcellus shale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OSHA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[violations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wv]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frackcheckwv.net/?p=2689</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Regulators have fined Jay-Bee Oil &#38; Gas more than $73,000 after finding the same kinds of violations in Harrison County that inspectors found a year ago when they visited the site.  The U.S. Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) issued 10 repeat citations, three serious citations and four other citations last week for problems at [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p><a title="Jay-Bee Oil and Gas Fined For Repeat Violations" href="http://wvgazette.com/News/201108050919" target="_blank">Regulators have fined Jay-Bee</a> Oil &amp; Gas more than $73,000 after finding the same kinds of violations in Harrison County that inspectors found a year ago when they visited the site.  The U.S. Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) issued 10 repeat citations, three serious citations and four other citations last week for problems at a drilling site near Salem.</p>
<p>&#8220;This company&#8217;s failure to correct previously cited violations means that it continues to place workers in harm&#8217;s way,&#8221; said Prentice Cline, director of OSHA&#8217;s Charleston area office. &#8220;It is vital that the company address these hazards to protect its employees.&#8221;</p>
<p>The repeat citations are based on an OSHA inspection conducted in February. They included the lack of guardrails or barricades around drilling pits, tripping hazards on walkways and the lack of first-aid equipment and training at the operation. OSHA inspectors also found that the company did not provide workers with required information or training about the hazardous materials used at the operation.</p>
<p>Jay-Bee Oil &amp; Gas of Union, New Jersey,  has drilled dozens of wells in West Virginia.  The company has 15 business days from receipt of the citations to comply, ask for an informal conference with OSHA&#8217;s area director or contest the citations and proposed penalties before the independent Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission.</p>
<p><a title="Worker Injuries Noted In Oil and Gas Industry" href="http://shale.sites.post-gazette.com/index.php/news/projects/23880-will-there-be-more-accidents-as-drilling-increases" target="_blank">At least four workers have died</a> at Marcellus Shale sites in Pennsylvania since 2008, including <a title="WV Man Killed At Well Pad In Greene County Pennsylvania" href="/2011/07/24/wv-man-killed-at-gas-well-site-in-greene-county-pa/" target="_blank">Kerry Duncan of Roane County</a>, WV, who died on July 22nd. And, two of the three <a title="Three Workers Burned in Washington County PA" href="http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/11056/1127804-503.stm" target="_blank">workers burned on February 10th</a> at a Chesapeake drilling site in Washington County, PA, were West Virginians. In fact, there have been <a title="Injuries Noted in Oil and Gas Industrty" href="http://shale.sites.post-gazette.com/index.php/news/projects/23880-will-there-be-more-accidents-as-drilling-increases" target="_blank">around 50 emergencies reported</a> at Marcellus shale gas operations in Pennsylvania since 2008.  OSHA and the various companies of the natural gas industry are including safety training in many cases for their employees, given the dangerous nature of the work involved.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://www.frackcheckwv.net/2011/08/07/gas-well-driller-cited-with-repeat-osha-violations-in-harrison-county/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
