<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Frack Check WV &#187; faulty equipment</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.frackcheckwv.net/tag/faulty-equipment/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.frackcheckwv.net</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress site</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Mar 2024 22:41:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Sources of Methane Emissions Identified in Fracking Industry</title>
		<link>https://www.frackcheckwv.net/2014/12/09/sources-of-methane-emissions-identified-in-fracking-industry/</link>
		<comments>https://www.frackcheckwv.net/2014/12/09/sources-of-methane-emissions-identified-in-fracking-industry/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2014 19:38:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dee Fulton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Accidents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Advocacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chemicals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EPA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Events]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Industry news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Study]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drilling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[faulty equipment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flares]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fracking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[greenhouse gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[leaks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[methane]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[natural gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[off-gases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shale gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[toxic chemicals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vents]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frackcheckwv.net/?p=13282</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Small number of wells responsible for methane emissions . From an Article by Max. B. Baker, Dallas Star-Telegraph, December 9, 2014 A small number of natural gas wells are responsible for the majority of the methane gas being released into the atmosphere during production, but at higher levels than previously estimated by the U.S. Environmental [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><div>
<div><strong></p>
<div id="attachment_13284" class="wp-caption alignright" style="width: 300px">
	<a href="/wp-content/uploads/2014/12/EDF-greenwashing.jpg"><img class="size-medium wp-image-13284" title="EDF greenwashing" src="/wp-content/uploads/2014/12/EDF-greenwashing-300x134.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="134" /></a>
	<p class="wp-caption-text">Good work, but not the complete story ...</p>
</div>
<p></strong><strong> </strong><strong> </strong><strong> </strong><strong> </strong></p>
</div>
<div><strong>Small number of wells responsible for methane emissions</strong></div>
<div>.</div>
<div>From an <a title="Small number of wells responsible for most methane" href="http://www.star-telegram.com/2014/12/09/6350280/small-number-of-wells-responsible.html" target="_blank">Article by Max. B. Baker</a>, Dallas Star-Telegraph, December 9, 2014</div>
<div>A small number of natural gas wells  are responsible for the majority of the methane gas being released into the  atmosphere during production, but at higher levels than previously estimated by  the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, according to a new study.</div>
<div id="article">
<p>Researchers from the University of  Texas at Austin, benefiting from unprecedented direct access to gas well sites  across the United States, found in one test that methane releases into the  atmosphere were the lowest in the Rocky Mountain region but the highest along  the Gulf Coast.</p>
<p>With natural gas exploration  expected to increase over the next decade, the researchers said it is important  to get a better understanding since methane emissions amounting to just a  percentage of natural gas use “can change the greenhouse gas footprint of  natural gas.”</p>
<p>David Allen, the principal  investigator for the study and a chemical engineering professor at the Cockerell  School of Engineering at UT Austin, compared the impact of the methane emissions  from a small number of drilling sites to the small subset of cars that  contribute to pollution.</p>
<p>“This is not a new idea,” Allen  said. “Over the past decade, 10 percent of the cars on the road have been  responsible for the majority of the automobile exhaust pollution.”</p>
<p>Matt Watson, the Environmental  Defense Fund’s national policy director, said the study is significant since its  conclusions are based on direct measurements made in the field and not from  calculations that assume how equipment is operating. The EDF was one of the  study’s sponsors.</p>
<p>“These pollution-reduction  strategies are highly cost effective for methane alone, but when you consider  the other things this reduces it is that much more bang for the buck,” Watson  said.</p>
<p>The UT Austin-led field study is  being published in the Environmental Science  &amp; Technology journal today. It is the second phase of the team’s 2013  study, which involved the sponsorship of several energy companies, including  Pioneer Natural Resources in Irving and Fort Worth-based XTO Energy, a  subsidiary of Exxon Mobil.</p>
<p>The research team from the Austin  campus examined two major sources of methane emissions — liquid unloadings and  pneumatic controller equipment — at wells pads across the country. Together,  they make up 40 percent of gross production emissions, the study found.</p>
<p>In all, the researchers took  measurements at 268 wells across the country.</p>
<p>Pneumatic controllers</p>
<p>The study found that 19 percent of  the pneumatic devices accounted for 95 percent of the emissions. These devices  use gas pressure to control the opening and closing of valves and emit gas when  they operate. These emissions are estimated to be among the largest sources of  methane gas emissions in the natural gas supply chain, the study said.</p>
<p>But while the EPA reports that  there are about 500,000 of these devices in use throughout the United States, or  about one per well site, the UT study found that there were almost three at each  site they visited, increasing the opportunity for emissions. The UT team  actually measured the emissions at 377 controllers at 65 pad sites with 161  wells that had been hydraulically fractured.</p>
<p>The average methane emissions per  controller in the study are 17 percent higher than the average emissions  estimated in an 2012 EPA study released earlier this year. About two-thirds of  the high-emitting devices were not operating properly and may need to be  repaired or replaced, Allen said.</p>
<p>Liquid unloadings</p>
<p>Liquid unloading is a method used  by operators to clear wells of accumulated liquids to increase their production.  Since older wells typically produce less gas as they near the end of their life,  unloadings happen more often than in new wells, the study states.</p>
<p>The research team measured  emissions from wells at 107 natural gas production sites and found that 20  percent of the wells with unloading emissions venting into the air accounted for  up to 83 percent of the methane released into the atmosphere, the study  found.</p>
<p>The team found a statistical  correlation between the age of wells and the frequency of liquid that is  unloaded, and that the amount of emissions was directly tied to how many times  this occurred, according to the study.</p>
<p>Because of the large number of  wells with frequent unloadings that vent into the air, the Rocky Mountain region  accounted for about half of the overall methane emissions, researchers  found.</p>
<p>Fixing the problem</p>
<p>Ed Ireland, executive director of  the Barnett Shale Energy Education Council, an industry-sponsored group, found  it noteworthy that the amount of gas escaping at well sites dropped from 0.42  percent to 0.38 percent when compared to an earlier study by this team. And that  occurred while natural gas production was increasing, he said.</p>
<p>“I think it is a key statement that  most of the wells they have surveyed had low to no methane emissions,” Ireland  said, adding, “The majority of wells are not emitting methane.”</p>
<p>“Methane emissions are lower and on  the right trajectory,” he said.</p>
<p>In that earlier study, the UT-led  team found that “green” completion equipment captures methane emissions on new  natural gas wells. The EPA already requires drillers to either capture or flare  methane and, starting next year, the gas must be captured. Two years ago, the  agency estimated about half of the new wells had green completion devices or  flared methane.</p>
<p>Watson agreed that fixing the  problem at the well sites is one of the most cost-effective things to do. He  said producers can get a 40 percent reduction in emissions for about 1 cent per  thousand cubic feet of natural gas.</p>
<p>See also: <a title="/" href="/">www.FrackCheckWV.net</a></p>
</div>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://www.frackcheckwv.net/2014/12/09/sources-of-methane-emissions-identified-in-fracking-industry/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
