<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Frack Check WV &#187; decline curves</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.frackcheckwv.net/tag/decline-curves/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.frackcheckwv.net</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress site</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Mar 2024 22:41:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Utica Shale Wells Show Sharp Decline Curves</title>
		<link>https://www.frackcheckwv.net/2015/01/05/utica-shale-wells-show-sharp-decline-curves/</link>
		<comments>https://www.frackcheckwv.net/2015/01/05/utica-shale-wells-show-sharp-decline-curves/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2015 15:52:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Duane Nichols</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Advocacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chemicals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Events]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Industry news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Study]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[capital investment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[decline curves]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drilling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fracking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gas production]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[methane]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[natural gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OH]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Utica Shale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wv]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frackcheckwv.net/?p=13490</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sharp declines in well production typical in Ohio’s Utica Shale From an Article by Bob Downing and Doug Livingston, Akron Beacon Journal, January 3, 2015 In the world of shale gas in Ohio, the top-producing wells aren’t king of the hill for long. Take the Tippens 6HS well, for example. Located in Monroe County in southeastern [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p><strong><a href="/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/Utica-production-Q3-2014.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-13494" title="Utica production Q3-2014" src="/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/Utica-production-Q3-2014.jpg" alt="" width="235" height="215" /></a>Sharp declines in well production typical in Ohio’s Utica Shale</strong></p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p>From an <a title="Uticas Shale Wells Show Sharp Decline Curves" href="http://www.ohio.com/news/local/sharp-declines-in-well-production-typical-in-ohio-s-utica-shale-1.555015" target="_blank">Article by Bob Downing and Doug Livingston</a>, Akron Beacon Journal, January 3, 2015</p>
<p>In the world of shale gas in Ohio, the top-producing wells aren’t king of the hill for long. Take the Tippens 6HS well, for example.</p>
<p>Located in Monroe County in southeastern Ohio, it produced more natural gas in the first quarter of 2014 than any other Utica Shale well in the state — some 1.117 billion cubic feet of the resource in 80 days, according to Ohio Department of Natural Resources records. That’s enough natural gas to fuel 12,000 houses for a year.</p>
<p>But the well that gushed 13,972 thousand cubic feet of natural gas per day in the first three months of 2014 saw daily production drop 41 percent in the second quarter to 8,180 thousand cubic feet per day and another 26 percent in the third quarter to 6,015 thousand cubic feet per day.</p>
<p>By autumn, the Tippens well was producing less than half the natural gas that it had during its peak output and slipped from No. 1 to No. 72. It went from being a stellar Ohio well to a good-producing well.</p>
<p>Similar drops are showing up in nearly all of Ohio’s horizontally drilled natural gas wells. Such numbers are evidence of what drillers call “production decline curves” — drop-offs over time. It’s a common (and expected) occurrence for shale wells, even in wells expected to produce for 30 years or more.</p>
<p>The bottom line: Shale wells produce the most in the first few years or, as evidenced in the sharply declining production rates in Ohio, their first few months. Understanding decline curves in the Utica Shale is an important and useful tool in decision-making for drilling companies. Sharp drops mean less money for drillers and less in royalty payments for landowners as wells age. Simply put, a decline curve is a graph of crude oil or natural gas production over time. As the products are extracted, production volumes trend downward. Hence, the term decline curve.</p>
<p>Analysis of Ohio’s decline curves is more complex. It won’t be possible to gauge fully how the Utica Shale in eastern Ohio compares with other shale formation in the United States until more time has passed and the Ohio Department of Natural Resources collects more data. Only five quarterly reports are now available.</p>
<p><strong>Analysis of output</strong></p>
<p>An analysis of Utica wells tapped in each of the first four quarters — from July 2013 through June 2014 — shows natural gas production had dropped 65 percent, said Dr. Jeffrey C. Dick, a professor and chair of the department of geology and environmental sciences at Youngstown State University and an expert on Utica Shale.</p>
<p>He estimated that Utica Shale production will drop 33 percent in the second year of a well’s life and another 22 percent in the third year. Decline is projected at another 17 percent in the fourth year, followed by 13 percent and 11 percent in the next two years, he said in a review that has circulated widely.</p>
<p>A graph of the annual declines resembles a swimming pool slide — unmistakably steep at first then gradually leveling off. Still, that initial Utica Shale production decline for the first year is “not too bad,” Dick said.</p>
<p>The Utica Shale production curve “is less of a drop than you might expect,” he said. It might “sound terrible, but it’s a pretty good number, actually.” Some production curves are as high as 80 percent in the first year, so what the Utica Shale is showing is “a fairly typical curve,” he said. Production drops of 80 percent have been found in the Haynesville Shale in Arkansas, Louisiana and Texas; parts of the Eagle Ford Shale in Texas; the Bakken Shale in North Dakota; and the Marcellus Shale in Pennsylvania, Dick said.</p>
<p>Determining decline rates is not easy, he said, because drilling companies have different approaches to production. Some want to draw down wells quickly, while others might restrict production to extend the lives of the wells or to wait until low prices rebound. Dick said that often the key for drillers who want to keep production totals high is for them to drill additional wells when production starts to decline significantly.</p>
<p><strong>Important question</strong></p>
<p>Drilling a Utica Shale well can cost from $6 million to $10 million, however, and an important question becomes: Can companies afford to keep drilling such wells?</p>
<p>Wells also can be hydraulically fractured, or fracked, multiple times to boost production. Even with the sharp decline curves, Ohio is not experiencing drops in total oil or natural gas production because additional wells are going online each quarter.</p>
<p>To date, Ohio has approved 1,735 Utica wells, of which 1,277 have been drilled. A total of 707 Utica wells are producing, according to ODNR figures. The most recent report, from third quarter 2014, for 717 wells showed total oil production of 3.013 million barrels and 132 billion cubic feet of natural gas. Both totals were significant jumps from the second quarter, when 504 wells were listed.</p>
<p>See also:  <a href="http://www.FrackCheckWV.net">www.FrackCheckWV.net</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://www.frackcheckwv.net/2015/01/05/utica-shale-wells-show-sharp-decline-curves/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rapid Shale Gas Well Decline Curves Spell Concerns for Frackers</title>
		<link>https://www.frackcheckwv.net/2014/05/28/rapid-shale-gas-well-decline-curves-spell-concerns-for-frackers/</link>
		<comments>https://www.frackcheckwv.net/2014/05/28/rapid-shale-gas-well-decline-curves-spell-concerns-for-frackers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2014 13:48:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>S. Tom Bond</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Advocacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chemicals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Industry news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Study]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[decline curves]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drilling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fracking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gas industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gas Shale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marcellus shale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[natural gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[production]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frackcheckwv.net/?p=11915</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Shakeout Threatens Shale Patch as Frackers Go for Broke From an Article by A. Loder, Bloomberg News, May 27, 2014 Drillers must keep borrowing to pay for the exploration needed to offset the steep decline in the production from fracked shale gas wells. The U.S. shale patch is facing a shakeout as drillers struggle to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p><a href="/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/Decline-Curves-EUR.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-11920" title="Decline Curves EUR" src="/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/Decline-Curves-EUR-300x186.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="186" /></a><strong>Shakeout Threatens Shale Patch as Frackers Go for Broke</strong></p>
<p>From an <a title="Decline Curves Tell Life of Gas Wells" href="http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2014-05-26/shakeout-threatens-shale-patch-as-frackers-go-for-broke.html" target="_blank">Article by A. Loder</a>,  Bloomberg News,  May 27, 2014</p>
<p>Drillers must keep borrowing to pay for the exploration needed to offset the steep decline in the production from fracked shale gas wells.</p>
<p>The U.S. shale patch is facing a  shakeout as drillers struggle to keep pace with the relentless spending needed  to get oil and gas out of the ground.</p>
<p>Shale debt has almost doubled over  the last four years while revenue has gained just 5.6 percent, according to a  Bloomberg News analysis of 61 shale drillers. A dozen of those wildcatters are  spending at least 10 percent of their sales on interest compared with Exxon  Mobil Corp.’s 0.1 percent.</p>
<p>“The list of companies that are  financially stressed is considerable,” said Benjamin Dell, managing partner of  Kimmeridge Energy, a New York-based alternative asset manager focused on energy.  “Not everyone is going to survive. We’ve seen it before.”</p>
<p>Some investors are already bailing  out. On May 23, Loews Corp., the holding  company run by New York’s Tisch  family, said it is weighing the sale of HighMount Exploration &amp; Production  LLC, its oil and natural gas subsidiary, at a loss.</p>
<p>HighMount lost $20 million in the  first three months of the year, after being unprofitable in 2013 and 2012, Loews  said it its financial reports. As with much of the industry, HighMount has  shifted its focus to oil after natural gas prices plunged and has struggled to find sites worth developing, company records  show.</p>
<p>In a measure of the shale industry’s financial burden, debt hit $163.6 billion in the first quarter,  according to company records compiled by Bloomberg on 61 exploration and production companies that target oil and natural gas trapped in deep underground layers of rock. And companies including Forest Oil  Corp., Goodrich  Petroleum Corp. and Quicksilver Resources Inc. racked up interest expense of more than 20 percent.</p>
<p><strong>Production Declines</strong></p>
<p>Quicksilver acknowledges the company is over-leveraged,  said David Erdman, a spokesman for Quicksilver. The company’s interest expense  equaled almost 45 percent of revenue in the first quarter. “We have taken  concrete measures to reduce debt,” he said.</p>
<p>Drillers are caught in a bind. They  must keep borrowing to pay for exploration needed to offset the steep production  declines typical of shale wells. At the same time, investors have been pushing  companies to cut back. Spending tumbled at 26 of the 61 firms examined. For  companies that can’t afford to keep drilling, less oil coming out means less  money coming in, accelerating the financial tailspin.</p>
<p><strong>Interest Expenses</strong></p>
<p>“Interest expenses are rising,”  said Virendra Chauhan, an oil analyst with Energy Aspects in London. “The risk for shale producers is that because of the production decline rates, you constantly have elevated capital expenditures.”</p>
<p>Chauhan wrote a report last year titled “The Other Tale of Shale” that showed interest expenses are gobbling up a  growing share of revenue at 35 companies he studied. Interest expense for the 61  companies examined by Bloomberg totalled almost $2 billion in the first quarter,  4.1 percent of revenue, up from 2.3 percent four years ago.</p>
<p>The drilling spree boosted &gt;U.S. oil production to 8.4 million  barrels a day, 16 percent more than a year ago and the highest since 1986.  Growth has been driven by advances in horizontal drilling and hydraulic  fracturing, or fracking, which unlocked crude and natural gas trapped in  formations like the Bakken shale or the Marcellus shale in the U.S. northeast.</p>
<p><strong>Costly Gains</strong></p>
<p>The gains haven’t come cheaply.  Goodrich said earlier this month that it’s trying to whittle its well costs in  the Tuscaloosa Marine Shale down to $11.5 million apiece. The $1.1 billion  company, based in Houston, spent almost $52 million more than it earned in the  first quarter.</p>
<p>The company has enough money to  cover its 2014 capital needs and is working with its board to fund 2015 as it  ramps up drilling. A successful well announced last month has propelled  Goodrich shares to $25.34, more than double the 2014 low of $12.28.</p>
<p>While borrowing to spend is typical  of start-up companies, it’s not always sustainable. Forest Oil, where interest  expense totaled 27 percent of revenue in the first quarter, in February <a title="http://quote/FST:US" href="mip:/quote/FST:US">reported</a> disappointing well results, and warned that it  might run afoul of its debt agreements. Forest on May 6 announced a plan to sell  itself to Sabine Oil &amp; Gas LLC in an all-stock transaction. The company  declined comment. Shares have declined 39 percent so far this year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://www.frackcheckwv.net/2014/05/28/rapid-shale-gas-well-decline-curves-spell-concerns-for-frackers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
