<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Frack Check WV &#187; Coast Guard</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.frackcheckwv.net/tag/coast-guard/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.frackcheckwv.net</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress site</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Mar 2024 22:41:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>GreenHunter Calls It &#8220;oil field waste&#8221; But the Coast Guard Calls It  &#8220;shale gas extraction wastewater&#8221;</title>
		<link>https://www.frackcheckwv.net/2015/02/07/greenhunter-calls-it-oil-field-waste-but-the-coast-guard-calls-it-shale-gas-extraction-wastewater/</link>
		<comments>https://www.frackcheckwv.net/2015/02/07/greenhunter-calls-it-oil-field-waste-but-the-coast-guard-calls-it-shale-gas-extraction-wastewater/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Feb 2015 11:30:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Duane Nichols</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Accidents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Advocacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chemicals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Events]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Industry news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Study]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coast Guard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drilling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fracking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GreenHunter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marcellus shale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[natural gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[radioactivity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shale gas extraction wastewater]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[toxic chemicals]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frackcheckwv.net/?p=13761</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[GreenHunter Disputes Coast Guard Assertion Over Barging Drilling Waste From the Article by John McCabe, Wheeling Intelligencer, February 5, 2015 Wheeling, WV &#8212; The debate between GreenHunter Water and the U.S. Coast Guard over shipping fracking wastewater along the Ohio River appears to come down to just how the waste is classified. GreenHunter Water, a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p><strong> </strong></p>
<div id="attachment_13770" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 262px">
	<a href="/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/Protest-Injection-Wells.jpg"><img class="size-full wp-image-13770 " title="Protest Injection Wells" src="/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/Protest-Injection-Wells.jpg" alt="" width="262" height="193" /></a>
	<p class="wp-caption-text">Where is wastewater going? Injection?</p>
</div>
<p><strong>GreenHunter Disputes Coast Guard Assertion Over Barging Drilling Waste</strong></p>
<p>From the <a href="http://www.theintelligencer.net/page/content.detail/id/624404/GreenHunter-Disputes-Coast-Guard-Assertion-Over-Barging-Drilling-Waste.html?nav=526">Article by John McCabe</a>, Wheeling Intelligencer, February 5, 2015</p>
<p>Wheeling, WV &#8212; The debate between GreenHunter Water and the U.S. Coast Guard over shipping fracking wastewater along the Ohio River appears to come down to just how the waste is classified.</p>
<p>GreenHunter Water, a publicly traded company, this morning filed a regulatory statement with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission indicating the company classifies its fracking waste as <strong>&#8220;oil field waste,&#8221; not &#8220;shale gas extraction wastewater.&#8221; </strong>This distinction, the company asserts, will allow it to barge drilling waste on the Ohio River under a Coast Guard regulation from 1987.</p>
<p>The company informed its investors during an earnings conference call last week that it had received approval to ship the waste.</p>
<p>The Coast Guard on Wednesday said that it was still deciding whether to allow the barging of &#8220;shale gas extraction wastewater,&#8221; but did not address whether the waste could be considered oil field waste.</p>
<p>&#8220;We are committed to ensuring proper research with regards to shale gas extraction wastewater maritime transportation before approving any request to transport shale gas extraction wastewater,&#8221; Coast Guard Chief Warrant Officer Chad Saylor said.</p>
<p>U.S. Coast Guard Lt. Commander Joe Klinker this morning reiterated that statement, noting there was no update following GreenHunter&#8217;s filing.</p>
<p>In its regulatory filing, GreenHunter made the following statement:</p>
<p>&#8220;In response to the U.S. Coast Guard recently making statements to certain media outlets that it has not given the company clearance to ship wastewater by barge along the Ohio River, the company states that on Oct. 2, 2014, the company received a letter from Mr. R.V. Timme, captain in the U.S. Coast Guard, providing specifically that for any cargo that contains oil field waste, the cargo must be transported in accordance with Navigation and Inspection Circular 7-87. One of the definitions of oil field waste contained in NCIV 7-87 is &#8220;salt water (produced brine or produced water). May contain oil.</p>
<p>&#8220;Any and all cargo to be transported by the company on the Ohio River will be cargo classified as &#8216;oil field waste&#8217; as defined by NCIV 7-87 and other applicable regulations and not as &#8216;shale gas extraction wastewater.&#8217; Oil field waste is what the company handles on a daily basis in regards to transportation and disposal at its various SWD facilities.&#8221;</p>
<p>The NCIV 7-87 was issued on Oct. 13, 1987, titled &#8220;Guidance on Waterborne Transport of Oil Field Wastes.&#8221; A message left this morning for Capt. Timme at the Coast Guard&#8217;s Louisville office was not immediately returned.</p>
<p>GreenHunter has maintained Coast Guard approval is the roadblock preventing the company from further pursuing their planned porting area in the Warwood section of Wheeling.</p>
<p>&#8220;The U.S. Coast Guard approval is a significant win for both GreenHunter Resources and our valued clients,&#8221; company Chief Operating Officer Kirk Trosclair said January 26. &#8220;Our ability to transport disposal volumes via barge will significantly reduce our costs, improve our margins and allow us to pass along savings to our clients.&#8221;</p>
<p>See also: <a href="http://www.FrackCheckWV.net">www.FrackCheckWV.net</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://www.frackcheckwv.net/2015/02/07/greenhunter-calls-it-oil-field-waste-but-the-coast-guard-calls-it-shale-gas-extraction-wastewater/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Contrary to Reports by GreenHunter, Coast Guard Has Not Approved Barging Frack Wastes</title>
		<link>https://www.frackcheckwv.net/2015/02/06/contrary-to-reports-by-greenhunter-coast-guard-has-not-approved-barging-frack-wastes/</link>
		<comments>https://www.frackcheckwv.net/2015/02/06/contrary-to-reports-by-greenhunter-coast-guard-has-not-approved-barging-frack-wastes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2015 12:18:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Duane Nichols</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Accidents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Advocacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chemicals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Industry news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Study]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coast Guard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drilling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drinking water]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fracking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marcellus shale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ohio River]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[toxic chemicals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[waste water]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wheeling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wv]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frackcheckwv.net/?p=13752</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Coast Guard denies granting GreenHunter permission to barge fracking wastes on Ohio River From an Article by Casey Junkins,  Steubenville Herald-Star, February 5, 2015 Wheeling, WV &#8212; U.S. Coast Guard officials said Wednesday they are still reviewing a proposal by GreenHunter Resources to barge natural gas fracking waste on the Ohio River. Coast Guard Chief Warrant [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><div id="attachment_13756" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 300px">
	<a href="/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/photo-3.jpg"><img class="size-medium wp-image-13756" title="photo-3" src="/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/photo-3-300x214.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="214" /></a>
	<p class="wp-caption-text">Fracking Wastes: Toxic &amp; Radioactive Materials </p>
</div>
<p><strong>Coast Guard denies granting GreenHunter permission to barge fracking wastes on Ohio River</strong></p>
<p>From an <a href="http://www.heraldstaronline.com/page/content.detail/id/617605/Coast-Guard-denies-granting-firm-permission-to-barge-waste.html?nav=5010">Article by Casey Junkins</a>,  Steubenville Herald-Star, February 5, 2015</p>
<p>Wheeling, WV &#8212; U.S. Coast Guard officials said Wednesday they are still reviewing a proposal by GreenHunter Resources to barge natural gas fracking waste on the Ohio River.</p>
<p>Coast Guard Chief Warrant Officer Chad Saylor said officials have not yet taken final action on GreenHunter&#8217;s proposal to ship &#8220;shale gas extraction wastewater and has not classified this cargo for shipment.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;We are committed to ensuring proper research with regards to shale gas extraction waste water maritime transportation before approving any request to transport shale gas extraction waste water,&#8221; he added.</p>
<p>Last week during an earnings report conference call with investors, Kirk Trosclair, GreenHunter Resources chief operating officer, stated the company had received approval. Saylor declined to speculate why GreenHunter officials had the impression the Coast Guard granted them final approval for barging.</p>
<p>Last year, Coast Guard spokesman Carlos Diaz said the agency needed to sift through 70,000 comments on the matter, adding officials would take as much time as necessary to read all of them.</p>
<p>In a company statement dated January 26th, Trosclair claimed the Coast Guard gave the company permission to transport frack waste on Ohio River barges. GreenHunter officials have maintained this is the roadblock preventing them from further pursuing their planned porting area in the Warwood section of Wheeling.</p>
<p>&#8220;The U.S. Coast Guard approval is a significant win for both GreenHunter Resources and our valued clients,&#8221; Trosclair stated January 26th. &#8220;Our ability to transport disposal volumes via barge will significantly reduce our costs, improve our margins and allow us to pass along savings to our clients.&#8221;</p>
<p>&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;</p>
<p><strong>REMINDER: Public Forum on Drilling Under the Ohio River, Wheeling Jesuit University, Saturday, February 7th, 1:00 PM (See <a href="http://www.FrackCheckWV.net">www.FrackCheckWV.net</a> for January 31, 2015 for details).</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://www.frackcheckwv.net/2015/02/06/contrary-to-reports-by-greenhunter-coast-guard-has-not-approved-barging-frack-wastes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
