<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Frack Check WV &#187; British Geological Society</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.frackcheckwv.net/tag/british-geological-society/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.frackcheckwv.net</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress site</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Mar 2024 22:41:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Expert British Geological Report Blames Fracking for UK Quakes</title>
		<link>https://www.frackcheckwv.net/2011/11/03/expert-british-geological-report-blames-fracking-for-uk-quakes/</link>
		<comments>https://www.frackcheckwv.net/2011/11/03/expert-british-geological-report-blames-fracking-for-uk-quakes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Nov 2011 20:27:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dee Fulton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[British Geological Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cuadrilla Resources]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drilling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[earthquakes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[frack fluid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fracking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marcellus shale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[residual wastes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seismic events]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UK]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frackcheckwv.net/?p=3460</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A report by the British Geological Society (BGS)concludes that fracking caused two earthquakes in the United Kingdom (UK). The report was commissioned by Cuadrilla Resources Ltd, the company that performed the fracking operations and is implicated in the quake episodes and in a multitude of smaller seismic events. .     .     . There is confusion in [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p><a href="/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/British-Geo.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-3461" title="British Geo" src="/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/British-Geo.jpg" alt="" width="120" height="174" /></a></p>
<div>A <a title="http://www.bgs.ac.uk/research/earthquakes/blackpoolMay2011.html?src=sfb" href="http://www.bgs.ac.uk/research/earthquakes/blackpoolMay2011.html?src=sfb">report by the British Geological Society </a>(BGS)concludes that fracking caused two earthquakes in the United Kingdom (UK). The report was commissioned by Cuadrilla Resources Ltd, the company that performed the fracking operations and is implicated in the quake episodes and in a multitude of smaller seismic events.</div>
<div>.     .     .</div>
<div>There is confusion in media reports. Some state that the report concludes that the geological conditions were unusual and that earthquakes are unlikely to reoccur. This is <strong>not</strong> what is stated in the expert BGS report.  Cuadrilla Energy made those statements, which apparently are not based upon anything other than their opinion at this time. <em> </em>What the BGS report concludes is that the two earthquakes, April 1 and May 27, could be placed as occurring within 500 metres of Cuadrilla&#8217;s Preese Hall drilling site in Blackpool and that the timing of those events following the injection of fluids during fracking at those locations suggests that the quakes were caused by the fracking.</div>
<div>.     .     .</div>
<div>Excerpted from the <a title="http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/0/df3cbc08-053c-11e1-a3d1-00144feabdc0.html?ftcamp=rss#axzz1cf4kVGtO" href="http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/0/df3cbc08-053c-11e1-a3d1-00144feabdc0.html?ftcamp=rss#axzz1cf4kVGtO" target="_blank">UK-based Financial Times</a>, November 2, 2011, by reporters Sylvia Pfeifer and Andrew Bounds in a story titled &#8220;Shale Gas Fracking Blamed for Blackpool Quake&#8221;:</div>
<div>.     .     .</div>
<div><em>Efforts to unlock the UK’s potentially significant shale gas reserves suffered a setback after a report found that fracking, the technique used to extract the gas from underground rocks, was the “highly probable” cause of two minor earthquakes in the Blackpool area in the spring.</em></div>
<div><em>.     .     . </em></div>
<div>The <a title="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970203804204577013771109580352.html" href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970203804204577013771109580352.html" target="_blank">Wall Street Journal </a>adds, &#8220;The report, which was financed by U.K. energy company Cuadrilla Resources Ltd., pointed to &#8220;strong evidence&#8221; that the two minor earthquakes and 48 weaker seismic events resulted from Cuadrilla&#8217;s pumping drilling fluids used in hydraulic fracturing, or &#8220;fracking.&#8221;</div>
<div>.     .     .</div>
<div>In the industry journal, <a title="http://www.petroleum-economist.com/Article/2928379/Unconventional/No-threat-from-fracking-earthquakes.html?LS=EMS584432" href="http://www.petroleum-economist.com/Article/2928379/Unconventional/No-threat-from-fracking-earthquakes.html?LS=EMS584432">PE Unconventional</a> (subscription required), a story on the same subject was given a different spin in its title &#8220;No threat from fracking tremors&#8221;. This misleading title appears to be a gross distortion of the news.</div>
<div>.     .     .</div>
<div>A look-see at the report by the BGS reveals some straightforward statements of fact:</div>
<div>
<div><em>&gt;&gt; &#8220;Any process that injects pressurised water into rocks at depth will cause the rock to fracture and possibly produce earthquakes.&#8221;</em></div>
<div><em>&gt;&gt; &#8220;It is well known that injection of water or other fluids during processes such as oil extraction, geothermal engineering and </em>shale gas<em> production can result in earthquake activity.&#8221; </em></div>
<div><em>&gt;&gt; &#8220;Typically, the earthquakes are too small to be felt, however, there are a number of examples of larger earthquakes occurring.&#8221;</em></div>
<div><em> .     .     .</em></div>
</div>
<div>Although the earthquakes were minor in that buildings didn&#8217;t collapse, there were reports of homes shaking in Blackpool during the magnitude 2.2 quake on April 1, 2011. I&#8217;m reminded of that tremor we felt in West Virginia at the end of August that originated in Virginia near Charlottesville. If a quake is capable of cracking the Washington Monument and knocking statuary angels off the National Cathedral, what will it do to the concrete and steel well casings that are our protection from ground water contamination from fracked wells? If quakes, even of a minor nature, are to be routinely expected in tandem with fracking, will the well casings hold up?</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://www.frackcheckwv.net/2011/11/03/expert-british-geological-report-blames-fracking-for-uk-quakes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
