<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Frack Check WV &#187; barium</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.frackcheckwv.net/tag/barium/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.frackcheckwv.net</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress site</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Mar 2024 22:41:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Report of Radioactive Wastes from Marcellus Shale Fracking</title>
		<link>https://www.frackcheckwv.net/2013/10/03/report-of-radioactive-wastes-from-marcellus-shale-fracking-video/</link>
		<comments>https://www.frackcheckwv.net/2013/10/03/report-of-radioactive-wastes-from-marcellus-shale-fracking-video/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Oct 2013 14:48:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Duane Nichols</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[barium]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bromide]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drilling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fracking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marcellus shale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[natural gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wastewater]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frackcheckwv.net/?p=9604</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Report of Radioactive Wastes from Marcellus Shale Fracking From the Article of the Binghamton Examiner, www.examiner.com, October 2, 2013 A new study conducted by Avner Vengosh, professor of geochemistry and water quality at Duke University&#8217;s Nicholas School of the Environment, and colleagues is the first to report substantially higher than normal levels of radioactive waste [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p><strong></p>
<div id="attachment_9612" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 240px">
	<a href="/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/Marcellus-shale-outcrop.jpg"><img class="size-full wp-image-9612" title="Marcellus shale outcrop" src="/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/Marcellus-shale-outcrop.jpg" alt="" width="240" height="179" /></a>
	<p class="wp-caption-text">Marcellus shale outcrop</p>
</div>
<p>Report of Radioactive Wastes from Marcellus Shale Fracking</p>
<p></strong></p>
<p>From the <a href="http://www.examiner.com/article/first-report-of-radioactive-waste-from-fracking-announced">Article of the Binghamton Examiner</a>, www.examiner.com, October 2, 2013</p>
<p>A new study conducted by Avner Vengosh, professor of geochemistry and water quality at Duke University&#8217;s Nicholas School of the Environment, and colleagues is the first to report substantially higher than normal levels of radioactive waste in the effluent waters processed from the hydraulic fracturing in the Marcellus Shale area of Pennsylvania. The research was reported in the October 2, 2013, issue of the journal Environmental Science &amp; Technology.</p>
<p>Radium levels were 200 times higher downstream from the Josephine Brine Treatment Facility (hydraulic fracturing waste water treatment plant) than upstream in the Blacklick Creek. The treatment plant is state of the art and has been approved by the EPA.</p>
<p>The problem is that over time the accumulations of radioactive radium in the sediments down stream from the treatment plant have risen above what is considered a safe limit for drinking water. The potential duration of this radioactive contamination is thousands of years.</p>
<p>The researchers also found much higher levels of barium, bromide salts, and chloride salts in the water downstream from the treatment plant than above the plant.</p>
<p>The scientists recommend that operations be suspended until sufficient equipment can be installed to mitigate the pollution problems that are produced from shale oil production in any form.</p>
<p>NOTE: See also the <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-10-02/radiation-in-pennsylvania-creek-seen-as-legacy-of-frackin.html">more complete Article here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://www.frackcheckwv.net/2013/10/03/report-of-radioactive-wastes-from-marcellus-shale-fracking-video/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
