<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Frack Check WV &#187; aquatic species</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.frackcheckwv.net/tag/aquatic-species/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.frackcheckwv.net</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress site</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Mar 2024 22:41:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Atlantic Coast Pipeline Can Add Excess Sediment to WV Streams</title>
		<link>https://www.frackcheckwv.net/2017/08/02/atlantic-coast-pipeline-can-add-excess-sediment-to-wv-streams/</link>
		<comments>https://www.frackcheckwv.net/2017/08/02/atlantic-coast-pipeline-can-add-excess-sediment-to-wv-streams/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Aug 2017 21:45:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Duane Nichols</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Accidents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Advocacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chemicals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DEP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Events]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Industry news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Study]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ACP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aquatic species]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Atlantic Coast Pipeline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dominion Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drilling muds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[national forests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sediment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stream disturbances]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[subsidence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[toxic chemicals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wv]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frackcheckwv.net/?p=20616</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Comments on the Atlantic Coast Pipeline (ACP) are Due THIS Friday, August 4th From West Virginia Rivers Coalition, Main Web-site, August 1, 2017 You have an opportunity to comment on the proposed Atlantic Coast Pipeline’s Water Quality Certification, the permit that ensures the project meets West Virginia’s water quality standards. As proposed the Atlantic Coast [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p><a href="/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/IMG_02041.jpg"><img src="/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/IMG_02041-300x112.jpg" alt="" title="IMG_0204" width="300" height="112" class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-20618" /></a><strong>Comments on the Atlantic Coast Pipeline (ACP) are Due THIS Friday, August 4th</strong></p>
<p>From West Virginia Rivers Coalition, <a href="http://www.wvrivers.org">Main Web-site</a>, August 1, 2017</p>
<p>You have an opportunity to <a href="https://actionnetwork.org/letters/comment-to-wvdep-on-environmental-impacts-of-the-acp?source=direct_link&#038;">comment</a> on the proposed <a href="http://wvrivers.org/2017/07/comment-to-wvdep-on-environmental-impacts-of-the-acp/">Atlantic Coast Pipeline’s Water Quality Certification</a>, the permit that ensures the project meets West Virginia’s water quality standards.</p>
<p>As proposed the Atlantic Coast Pipeline would span three states — North Carolina, Virginia and West Virginia. In West Virginia alone the pipeline would impact approximately 400 stream segments, some streams would be crossed multiple times.</p>
<p>We&#8217;ve reviewed the ACP&#8217;s <a href="http://wvrivers.org/2017/07/comment-to-wvdep-on-environmental-impacts-of-the-acp/">Water Quality Certification</a> and found that it lacks critical information the WVDEP needs to certify that the project will be able to meet WV’s Water Quality Standards. View our <a href="http://wvrivers.org/2017/07/comment-to-wvdep-on-environmental-impacts-of-the-acp/">fact sheet on the permit here</a>.</p>
<p> We made it easy to submit comments online! <a href="https://actionnetwork.org/letters/comment-to-wvdep-on-environmental-impacts-of-the-acp?source=direct_link&#038;">Click here to comment</a> on the Atlantic Coast Pipeline&#8217;s Water Quality Certification. </p>
<p>Comments are due this Friday, August 4. </p>
<p>>>> For more information contact West Virginia Rivers Coalition:<br />
>>> www.wvrivers.org &#8211; (304) 637-7201</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://www.frackcheckwv.net/2017/08/02/atlantic-coast-pipeline-can-add-excess-sediment-to-wv-streams/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Headwater Streams and Wetlands Across the USA at Risk for More Pollution</title>
		<link>https://www.frackcheckwv.net/2017/08/02/headwater-streams-and-wetlands-across-the-usa-at-risk-for-more-pollution/</link>
		<comments>https://www.frackcheckwv.net/2017/08/02/headwater-streams-and-wetlands-across-the-usa-at-risk-for-more-pollution/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Aug 2017 13:06:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Duane Nichols</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Accidents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Advocacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chemicals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EPA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Events]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Industry news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Study]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aquatic species]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environmental impacts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Headwater Streams]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sediment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[toxic chemicals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US EPA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[water pollution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wetlands]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frackcheckwv.net/?p=20605</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Time is Now to Contact EPA and Your Congressional Delegation From West Virginia Rivers Coalition, Main Web-site, July 31, 2017 Headwater streams and wetlands across West Virginia like Big Run Bog in Tucker County, pictured below, are at risk to loose protection under the Clean Water Act. The Trump Administration has begun the process [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p><a href="/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/IMG_0204.jpg"><img src="/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/IMG_0204-300x112.jpg" alt="" title="IMG_0204" width="300" height="112" class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-20609" /></a><strong>The Time is Now to Contact EPA and Your Congressional Delegation</strong></p>
<p>From West Virginia Rivers Coalition, <a href="http://www.wvrivers.org">Main Web-site</a>, July 31, 2017</p>
<p>Headwater streams and wetlands across West Virginia like Big Run Bog in Tucker County, pictured below, are at risk to loose protection under the Clean Water Act.</p>
<p>The Trump Administration has begun the process to remove critical protections for wetlands and headwater streams through the repeal of the Clean Water Rule, putting drinking water for more than half (54%) of all West Virginians at greater risk for pollution.</p>
<p>Passed in 2015, the Clean Water Rule clarifies which water-bodies are protected under the Clean Water Act. Without the Clean Water Rule 8,390 miles of streams in West Virginia would be put at risk. </p>
<p>Speak up for clean water now! Let the Trump Administration know that you support a strong federal Clean Water Act and you oppose any action to repeal the Clean Water Rule. </p>
<p>The Clean Water Rule has strong public support. During a previous comment period, over 1 million comments were submitted, 87% of which were supportive of the Clean Water Rule, including over 2,000 comments submitted by West Virginians. </p>
<p><a href="https://actionnetwork.org/letters/defend-the-clean-water-rule?source=direct_link&#038;">Take action NOW by sending a letter to EPA Administrator Scott Pruitt</a> supporting the Clean Water Rule.</p>
<p><a href="https://actionnetwork.org/letters/defend-the-clean-water-rule?source=direct_link&#038;">Click Here to Support Clean Streams</a></p>
<p>For more information contact: </p>
<p>>>> West Virginia Rivers Coalition<br />
<a href="http://www.wvrivers.org">www.wvrivers.org</a> &#8211; (304) 637-7201<br />
<div id="attachment_20610" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 300px">
	<a href="/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/IMG_0203.jpg"><img src="/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/IMG_0203-300x200.jpg" alt="" title="IMG_0203" width="300" height="200" class="size-medium wp-image-20610" /></a>
	<p class="wp-caption-text">Headwater stream in Tucker County, WV</p>
</div></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://www.frackcheckwv.net/2017/08/02/headwater-streams-and-wetlands-across-the-usa-at-risk-for-more-pollution/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
