<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Climate Change Resists Narrative, Yet the Alphabet Prevails (A to Z): Now C!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.frackcheckwv.net/2023/01/03/climate-change-resists-narrative-yet-the-alphabet-prevails-a-to-z-now-c/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.frackcheckwv.net/2023/01/03/climate-change-resists-narrative-yet-the-alphabet-prevails-a-to-z-now-c/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress site</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Feb 2024 02:06:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Skylark Bonus</title>
		<link>https://www.frackcheckwv.net/2023/01/03/climate-change-resists-narrative-yet-the-alphabet-prevails-a-to-z-now-c/#comment-439660</link>
		<dc:creator>Skylark Bonus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2023 14:40:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.frackcheckwv.net/?p=43456#comment-439660</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;ECONOMISTS’ STATEMENT ON CARBON DIVIDENDS, January 16, 2019&lt;/strong&gt;

Global climate change is a serious problem calling for immediate national action. Guided by sound economic principles, we are united in the following policy recommendations. 

I.          A carbon tax offers the most cost-effective lever to reduce carbon emissions at the scale and speed that is necessary. By correcting a well-known market failure, a carbon tax will send a powerful price signal that harnesses the invisible hand of the marketplace to steer economic actors towards a low-carbon future. 

II.         A carbon tax should increase every year until emissions reductions goals are met and be revenue neutral to avoid debates over the size of government. A consistently rising carbon price will encourage technological innovation and large-scale infrastructure development. It will also accelerate the diffusion of carbon-efficient goods and services. 

III.        A sufficiently robust and gradually rising carbon tax will replace the need for various carbon regulations that are less efficient. Substituting a price signal for cumbersome regulations will promote economic growth and provide the regulatory certainty companies need for long- term investment in clean-energy alternatives. 

IV.        To prevent carbon leakage and to protect U.S. competitiveness, a border carbon adjustment system should be established. This system would enhance the competitiveness of American firms that are more energy-efficient than their global competitors. It would also create an incentive for other nations to adopt similar carbon pricing. 

V.         To maximize the fairness and political viability of a rising carbon tax, all the revenue should be returned directly to U.S. citizens through equal lump-sum rebates. The majority of American families, including the most vulnerable, will benefit financially by receiving more in “carbon dividends” than they pay in increased energy prices.

ORIGINAL CO-SIGNATORIES INCLUDE:

28Nobel Laureate Economists

4Former Chairs of the Federal Reserve

15Former Chairs of the Council of Economic Advisers

SOURCE: https://www.econstatement.org/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>ECONOMISTS’ STATEMENT ON CARBON DIVIDENDS, January 16, 2019</strong></p>
<p>Global climate change is a serious problem calling for immediate national action. Guided by sound economic principles, we are united in the following policy recommendations. </p>
<p>I.          A carbon tax offers the most cost-effective lever to reduce carbon emissions at the scale and speed that is necessary. By correcting a well-known market failure, a carbon tax will send a powerful price signal that harnesses the invisible hand of the marketplace to steer economic actors towards a low-carbon future. </p>
<p>II.         A carbon tax should increase every year until emissions reductions goals are met and be revenue neutral to avoid debates over the size of government. A consistently rising carbon price will encourage technological innovation and large-scale infrastructure development. It will also accelerate the diffusion of carbon-efficient goods and services. </p>
<p>III.        A sufficiently robust and gradually rising carbon tax will replace the need for various carbon regulations that are less efficient. Substituting a price signal for cumbersome regulations will promote economic growth and provide the regulatory certainty companies need for long- term investment in clean-energy alternatives. </p>
<p>IV.        To prevent carbon leakage and to protect U.S. competitiveness, a border carbon adjustment system should be established. This system would enhance the competitiveness of American firms that are more energy-efficient than their global competitors. It would also create an incentive for other nations to adopt similar carbon pricing. </p>
<p>V.         To maximize the fairness and political viability of a rising carbon tax, all the revenue should be returned directly to U.S. citizens through equal lump-sum rebates. The majority of American families, including the most vulnerable, will benefit financially by receiving more in “carbon dividends” than they pay in increased energy prices.</p>
<p>ORIGINAL CO-SIGNATORIES INCLUDE:</p>
<p>28Nobel Laureate Economists</p>
<p>4Former Chairs of the Federal Reserve</p>
<p>15Former Chairs of the Council of Economic Advisers</p>
<p>SOURCE: <a href="https://www.econstatement.org/" rel="nofollow">https://www.econstatement.org/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
