<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: WV-DEP Biological Assessment Rule Under Review — Virtual Meeting 3/9, Comments Due 3/11</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.frackcheckwv.net/2021/03/09/wv-dep-biological-assessment-rule-under-review-%e2%80%94-virtual-meeting-39-comments-due-311/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.frackcheckwv.net/2021/03/09/wv-dep-biological-assessment-rule-under-review-%e2%80%94-virtual-meeting-39-comments-due-311/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress site</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Feb 2024 02:06:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: West Virginia Rivers</title>
		<link>https://www.frackcheckwv.net/2021/03/09/wv-dep-biological-assessment-rule-under-review-%e2%80%94-virtual-meeting-39-comments-due-311/#comment-371978</link>
		<dc:creator>West Virginia Rivers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2021 02:43:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frackcheckwv.net/?p=36584#comment-371978</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Comment on WVDEP&#039;s Biological Assessment Rule&lt;/strong&gt;

From the West Virginia Rivers Coalition, Charleston, WV, March 9, 2021

Stream critters need your voice! WVDEP is accepting comments on a rule that weakens the analysis of the aquatic life found in a stream to assess whether the stream is meeting the state’s water quality standards. 

This new method was developed by WVDEP in response to legislation the WV Coal Association lobbied to pass, including Senate Bill 687 in 2017.  

Our water quality standards say that a stream must be able to support aquatic life. When this standard is applied, an assessment of the benthic macro invertebrates (aka stream bugs) is conducted. But the question is: How much life can be killed before action is taken to reduce pollution?  

To be able to address pollution before it kills off stream life, the most precise measurement to assess stream life should be used. The WVDEP is proposing to use an outdated method. Since 2010, the EPA has recommended WVDEP adopt a more scientifically precise system called GLIMPSS. EPA has also opposed WVDEP putting certain streams in a “grey zone” category where compliance with water quality standards is not determined. This grey zone keeps streams from receiving the help they need to meet our water quality standards.  

You can submit comments on the proposed rule through April 20. (This extended deadline was set so that a 45 day Comment Period would satisfy the US EPA requirement).

https://wvrivers.salsalabs.org/wvdepbiologicalassessmentrule/index.html?eType=EmailBlastContent&amp;eId=7ee969bf-eadf-4db5-ab35-c89e0e5a81e6</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Comment on WVDEP&#8217;s Biological Assessment Rule</strong></p>
<p>From the West Virginia Rivers Coalition, Charleston, WV, March 9, 2021</p>
<p>Stream critters need your voice! WVDEP is accepting comments on a rule that weakens the analysis of the aquatic life found in a stream to assess whether the stream is meeting the state’s water quality standards. </p>
<p>This new method was developed by WVDEP in response to legislation the WV Coal Association lobbied to pass, including Senate Bill 687 in 2017.  </p>
<p>Our water quality standards say that a stream must be able to support aquatic life. When this standard is applied, an assessment of the benthic macro invertebrates (aka stream bugs) is conducted. But the question is: How much life can be killed before action is taken to reduce pollution?  </p>
<p>To be able to address pollution before it kills off stream life, the most precise measurement to assess stream life should be used. The WVDEP is proposing to use an outdated method. Since 2010, the EPA has recommended WVDEP adopt a more scientifically precise system called GLIMPSS. EPA has also opposed WVDEP putting certain streams in a “grey zone” category where compliance with water quality standards is not determined. This grey zone keeps streams from receiving the help they need to meet our water quality standards.  </p>
<p>You can submit comments on the proposed rule through April 20. (This extended deadline was set so that a 45 day Comment Period would satisfy the US EPA requirement).</p>
<p><a href="https://wvrivers.salsalabs.org/wvdepbiologicalassessmentrule/index.html?eType=EmailBlastContent&#038;eId=7ee969bf-eadf-4db5-ab35-c89e0e5a81e6" rel="nofollow">https://wvrivers.salsalabs.org/wvdepbiologicalassessmentrule/index.html?eType=EmailBlastContent&#038;eId=7ee969bf-eadf-4db5-ab35-c89e0e5a81e6</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
