<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Strong Environmental Policy to Regulate Horizontal Drilling and Hydraulic Fracking is Appropriate</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.frackcheckwv.net/2020/03/25/strong-environmental-policy-to-regulate-horizontal-drilling-and-hydraulic-fracking-is-appropriate/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.frackcheckwv.net/2020/03/25/strong-environmental-policy-to-regulate-horizontal-drilling-and-hydraulic-fracking-is-appropriate/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress site</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Feb 2024 02:06:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mary Wildfire</title>
		<link>https://www.frackcheckwv.net/2020/03/25/strong-environmental-policy-to-regulate-horizontal-drilling-and-hydraulic-fracking-is-appropriate/#comment-267775</link>
		<dc:creator>Mary Wildfire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2020 15:04:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frackcheckwv.net/?p=31831#comment-267775</guid>
		<description>I reject this notion. The author cites a study done by EDF in conjunction with industry, I believe it&#039;s the one in which the gas company led the scientists around to check individual wells, and the results showed much less leakage than independent studies subsequently showed--but was nonetheless cited by industry and the government &quot;regulators&quot; to justify inaction. 

Early on, the author says maybe the best response would be to ramp up renewables but fracking made gas and oil irresistibly cheap so we&#039;ll use fossil fuels &quot;for the foreseeable future.&quot; 

Well, according to scientists NOT working for industry, the end of the foreseeable future is a brick wall we&#039;re speeding toward. Maybe we need not bother with converting to renewables at all if we&#039;re going to engineer our own extinction within a generation or two--&quot;the foreseeable future.&quot; 

What this is saying is that capitalism is not compatible with human survival -- which I think is the case. I looked at the original to see if I could comment (no) and I see this is a right-wing xenophobic rag so I shouldn&#039;t be surprised.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I reject this notion. The author cites a study done by EDF in conjunction with industry, I believe it&#8217;s the one in which the gas company led the scientists around to check individual wells, and the results showed much less leakage than independent studies subsequently showed&#8211;but was nonetheless cited by industry and the government &#8220;regulators&#8221; to justify inaction. </p>
<p>Early on, the author says maybe the best response would be to ramp up renewables but fracking made gas and oil irresistibly cheap so we&#8217;ll use fossil fuels &#8220;for the foreseeable future.&#8221; </p>
<p>Well, according to scientists NOT working for industry, the end of the foreseeable future is a brick wall we&#8217;re speeding toward. Maybe we need not bother with converting to renewables at all if we&#8217;re going to engineer our own extinction within a generation or two&#8211;&#8221;the foreseeable future.&#8221; </p>
<p>What this is saying is that capitalism is not compatible with human survival &#8212; which I think is the case. I looked at the original to see if I could comment (no) and I see this is a right-wing xenophobic rag so I shouldn&#8217;t be surprised.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
