<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: EQM Admits the Mountain Valley Pipeline is Delayed by Challenges</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.frackcheckwv.net/2019/08/09/eqm-admits-the-mountain-valley-pipeline-is-delayed-by-challenges/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.frackcheckwv.net/2019/08/09/eqm-admits-the-mountain-valley-pipeline-is-delayed-by-challenges/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress site</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Feb 2024 02:06:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joan Walker — Sierra Club</title>
		<link>https://www.frackcheckwv.net/2019/08/09/eqm-admits-the-mountain-valley-pipeline-is-delayed-by-challenges/#comment-239102</link>
		<dc:creator>Joan Walker — Sierra Club</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Aug 2019 20:44:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frackcheckwv.net/?p=28973#comment-239102</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Stop the Proposed Fracked Gas Mountain Valley Pipeline and Southgate Extension&lt;/strong&gt;

From Joan Walker, Campaign Representative, Sierra Club

RE: FERC Docket Number CP19-14-000

The Mountain Valley Pipeline (MVP) is a threat to the environment and the communities in its path from West Virginia into Virginia. Now, the company behind this proposed 300+ mile pipeline are scheming to get approval for the &quot;Southgate Extension&quot; that would add an additional 70 miles of pipeline from southern Virginia into central North Carolina.

Right now there is an opportunity for you and other members of the public to comment on a draft environmental impact statement created by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission for the MVP’s Southgate Extension. They are ignoring the serious risks this pipeline poses to drinking water quality and does not properly assess the effect of greenhouse gas emissions on the environment. This is not a risk that affected communities and landowners should be forced to bear for the profit of corporate polluters.

The draft environmental impact statement (DEIS) for the Mountain Valley Pipeline’s (MVP) Southgate Extension is woefully inadequate. The DEIS does not properly assess climate-altering greenhouse gas emissions or the effect of those emissions on the environment. It also minimizes the risk of impacts to private well owners’ water quality. Blasting and heavy equipment can damage infrastructure and make well water unsafe. This is not a risk that affected communities and landowners should be forced to bear.

The DEIS also assumes that if MVP complies with FERC’s “Plan, Mountain Valley’s Procedures, and E&amp;SC Plan” it would adequately avoid or minimize damage to surface waters. But current construction of the MVP main line has proven these plans and procedures are inadequate, and that MVP is unwilling to comply. In Phase I of this project, MVP has already violated commonsense water quality protections over 300 times in West Virginia and Virginia, and is being sued by Virginia’s Attorney General. Time after time, pollution and mudslides have run off their worksites and into streams, waterways, and even the homes of people living nearby. If MVP has had so many problems with the first phase of this project, why should we expect that construction of this extension will be any less damaging?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Stop the Proposed Fracked Gas Mountain Valley Pipeline and Southgate Extension</strong></p>
<p>From Joan Walker, Campaign Representative, Sierra Club</p>
<p>RE: FERC Docket Number CP19-14-000</p>
<p>The Mountain Valley Pipeline (MVP) is a threat to the environment and the communities in its path from West Virginia into Virginia. Now, the company behind this proposed 300+ mile pipeline are scheming to get approval for the &#8220;Southgate Extension&#8221; that would add an additional 70 miles of pipeline from southern Virginia into central North Carolina.</p>
<p>Right now there is an opportunity for you and other members of the public to comment on a draft environmental impact statement created by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission for the MVP’s Southgate Extension. They are ignoring the serious risks this pipeline poses to drinking water quality and does not properly assess the effect of greenhouse gas emissions on the environment. This is not a risk that affected communities and landowners should be forced to bear for the profit of corporate polluters.</p>
<p>The draft environmental impact statement (DEIS) for the Mountain Valley Pipeline’s (MVP) Southgate Extension is woefully inadequate. The DEIS does not properly assess climate-altering greenhouse gas emissions or the effect of those emissions on the environment. It also minimizes the risk of impacts to private well owners’ water quality. Blasting and heavy equipment can damage infrastructure and make well water unsafe. This is not a risk that affected communities and landowners should be forced to bear.</p>
<p>The DEIS also assumes that if MVP complies with FERC’s “Plan, Mountain Valley’s Procedures, and E&amp;SC Plan” it would adequately avoid or minimize damage to surface waters. But current construction of the MVP main line has proven these plans and procedures are inadequate, and that MVP is unwilling to comply. In Phase I of this project, MVP has already violated commonsense water quality protections over 300 times in West Virginia and Virginia, and is being sued by Virginia’s Attorney General. Time after time, pollution and mudslides have run off their worksites and into streams, waterways, and even the homes of people living nearby. If MVP has had so many problems with the first phase of this project, why should we expect that construction of this extension will be any less damaging?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lara Mack</title>
		<link>https://www.frackcheckwv.net/2019/08/09/eqm-admits-the-mountain-valley-pipeline-is-delayed-by-challenges/#comment-237961</link>
		<dc:creator>Lara Mack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Aug 2019 16:26:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frackcheckwv.net/?p=28973#comment-237961</guid>
		<description>Hello all,

I think most of you are aware that the draft environmental impact statement (DEIS) for the MVP Southgate extension project dropped on Friday, July 26. We have a 45 day comment period for the Southgate DEIS - deadline Monday, September 16. I&#039;ll be sure to share around DEIS commenting resources and petitions as soon as they are available. Link to Southgate DEIS here:

https://elibrary.ferc.gov/idmws/file_list.asp?accession_num=20190726-3011

There will be three comment periods. Two in North Carolina and one in Virginia. I&#039;m asking for ACP and MVP mainline resistors to show up to a listening session if you can! The DEIS listening session in Chatham VA (Pittsylvania County) is probably closest for most of the folks on this list. 

There will be a carpool from Blacksburg area to the Southgate DEIS Listening Session in Chatham, VA on Tuesday, August 20. Contact Penina Harte - penina.harte@appvoices.org - if you&#039;d like join the carpool. 

August 19, 2019, 5:00 – 8:00 p.m
Rockingham Community College
215 Wrenn Memorial Road
Wentworth, NC 27375
(336) 342-4261

August 20, 2019, 5:00 – 8:00 p.m
Olde Dominion Ag Complex
19783 U.S. Hwy. 29 South
Chatham, VA 24531
(434) 432-8026

August 22, 2019, 5:00 – 8:00 p.m.
Vailtree Event Center
1567 Bakatsias Lane
Haw River, NC 27258
(336) 578-4020


Thanks as always for your support!
-- 

Lara Celeste Mack, Virginia Field Coordinator
Appalachian Voices, 812 E. High Street,
Charlottesville, VA 22902

Call or text me directly at (434) 218-3277
or dial our office (434) 293-6373 ext. 623</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello all,</p>
<p>I think most of you are aware that the draft environmental impact statement (DEIS) for the MVP Southgate extension project dropped on Friday, July 26. We have a 45 day comment period for the Southgate DEIS &#8211; deadline Monday, September 16. I&#8217;ll be sure to share around DEIS commenting resources and petitions as soon as they are available. Link to Southgate DEIS here:</p>
<p><a href="https://elibrary.ferc.gov/idmws/file_list.asp?accession_num=20190726-3011" rel="nofollow">https://elibrary.ferc.gov/idmws/file_list.asp?accession_num=20190726-3011</a></p>
<p>There will be three comment periods. Two in North Carolina and one in Virginia. I&#8217;m asking for ACP and MVP mainline resistors to show up to a listening session if you can! The DEIS listening session in Chatham VA (Pittsylvania County) is probably closest for most of the folks on this list. </p>
<p>There will be a carpool from Blacksburg area to the Southgate DEIS Listening Session in Chatham, VA on Tuesday, August 20. Contact Penina Harte &#8211; <a href="mailto:penina.harte@appvoices.org">penina.harte@appvoices.org</a> &#8211; if you&#8217;d like join the carpool. </p>
<p>August 19, 2019, 5:00 – 8:00 p.m<br />
Rockingham Community College<br />
215 Wrenn Memorial Road<br />
Wentworth, NC 27375<br />
(336) 342-4261</p>
<p>August 20, 2019, 5:00 – 8:00 p.m<br />
Olde Dominion Ag Complex<br />
19783 U.S. Hwy. 29 South<br />
Chatham, VA 24531<br />
(434) 432-8026</p>
<p>August 22, 2019, 5:00 – 8:00 p.m.<br />
Vailtree Event Center<br />
1567 Bakatsias Lane<br />
Haw River, NC 27258<br />
(336) 578-4020</p>
<p>Thanks as always for your support!<br />
&#8211; </p>
<p>Lara Celeste Mack, Virginia Field Coordinator<br />
Appalachian Voices, 812 E. High Street,<br />
Charlottesville, VA 22902</p>
<p>Call or text me directly at (434) 218-3277<br />
or dial our office (434) 293-6373 ext. 623</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Sokolow</title>
		<link>https://www.frackcheckwv.net/2019/08/09/eqm-admits-the-mountain-valley-pipeline-is-delayed-by-challenges/#comment-237809</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Sokolow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Aug 2019 13:49:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frackcheckwv.net/?p=28973#comment-237809</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Definition of Insanity: Mountain Valley Pipeline Asks for “Emergency Authorization” to Prevent a Life Threatening Landslide
&lt;/strong&gt;
From an Analysis by Jon Sokolow, Blue Virginia, August 9, 2019

The latest outrage from Mountain Valley Pipeline is almost beyond belief.

In July, this bloated corporate criminal – MVP is under criminal investigation by the U. S. Attorney’s Office in Roanoke – sent out a crew to survey a portion of the pipeline route in West Virginia. Among other things, they were looking for endangered species.

The MVP surveyors were unable to do their work, however, because the pipeline route was too dangerous for them.

Dangerous, as in it was in imminent danger of a landslide.

In a July filing with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, MVP admitted:

“MVP attempted to conduct stream and wetland delineations, cultural resource, and rare, threatened, and endangered species surveys. Due to the instability of the slip, surveys were limited.”

MVP asked for permission to do “emergency slip remediation.”

MVP’s “emergency” request was dated July 11, but it was not actually filed with FERC until July 29.  That gives a sense of how seriously MVP takes the term “emergency.”

It is not clear what remediation work MVP did after its July 29 filing.  What is clear is that whatever work was done did not work.

Yesterday, ten days after filing its “emergency” request with FERC, MVP dropped a new bombshell.  An MVP attorney wrote FERC to provide “additional information” on MVP’s “slide repair” request:

“Due to the unstable nature of this slide, Mountain Valley is requesting emergency authorization from the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission to cut trees necessary to repair the slide.”

In this filing, MVP disclosed that the “slip” problem on this particular site actually had been going on for more than three months:

“This slide was identified on April 22, 2019 and was stabilized. Following a significant rain event on July 7, 2019, additional slide movement was observed on July 11, 2019.”

Three months after the initial landslide danger was noted, however, the problem has not been resolved.  In fact, it has gotten worse.

Much worse. In a chilling passage in yesterday’s letter, MVP made this stunning revelation:

“The progression of the slide caused additional area outside the limits of disturbance to destabilize, uprooted numerous large trees, has the potential to impact an aquatic resource, and has progressed to the point where a residence directly downslope is unsafe to be occupied. Mountain Valley Pipeline must stabilize the slide before it causes damage or injury to the landowners and resources located down-slope of the slide.”

That bears repeating.  MVP has made a residence “unsafe to be occupied.”  And something must be done to alleviate the danger of a landslide “before it causes damage or injury.”

Last week, we wrote that MVP’s main contractor, Precision Pipeline, has a history of killing its own workers.  One year ago, we wrote here and here, that Precision Pipeline has a terrifying record of causing landslides on its pipeline projects.  In fact, none other than Dominion Energy sued Precision Pipeline for having caused 50 landslides in a 55-mile pipeline project Precision built for Dominion.

Now it is beyond debate that MVP is endangering lives on this project.  MVP just admitted it.

How many more such slides exist along the 303-mile route of this pipeline?

It seems that no one in a position of power has been listening.

Until recently, that is, when Virginia Department of Environmental Quality Director David Paylor said he was “appalled” to find erosion and sediment control problems with MVP.  He was so appalled that he issued a stop work order for the MVP – along a two mile stretch of the route.

And now MVP is admitting that lives are in danger.  Not hypothetical danger, but the type of danger that requires “emergency” action.

As Tammy Belinsky, a Floyd County attorney involved in the fight to stop the Mountain Valley Pipeline, noted in reaction to MVP’s latest admission:

“They cut the trees off a slope that should have been known to have unstable soils.  Then MVP cut more trees down in a failed attempt to stabilize a slide.  Now MVP wants to cut more trees hoping for a different result.  Definition of insanity, no?”

MVP clearly is in a rush to complete this $5 billion corpore boondoggle, which already is years behind schedule.  With the Fourth Circuit repeatedly rejecting permits for the MVP and for the Atlantic Coast Pipeline, and with investors seemingly nervous about the overall health of the companies behind MVP, it is clear that MVP is willing to do whatever it takes, no matter the risk, to get this project done before someone shuts it down.

Which raises the question, are any state officials in Virginia (or West Virginia) paying attention?  What will it take to get the Department of Environmental Quality to shut MVP down?  What will it take for Virginia Attorney General Mark Herring, who already has accused MVP of having committed more than 300 violations of Virginia water laws and regulations, to advise his client, DEQ, to issue a stop work order along the entire route?

How many landslides is too many?  How many workers or landowners will have to be hurt? How many residences will have to be made “unsafe to be occupied.”

This is not complicated.  It’s an emergency.  Just ask MVP.

https://bluevirginia.us/2019/08/definition-of-insanity-mountain-valley-pipeline-asks-for-emergency-authorization-to-prevent-a-life-threatening-landslide?fbclid=IwAR1ecIQdo8NQ_eAFMgV--3d9gXai7fEJYWb2IEQl7i9mmyywos3drWElEtY</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Definition of Insanity: Mountain Valley Pipeline Asks for “Emergency Authorization” to Prevent a Life Threatening Landslide<br />
</strong><br />
From an Analysis by Jon Sokolow, Blue Virginia, August 9, 2019</p>
<p>The latest outrage from Mountain Valley Pipeline is almost beyond belief.</p>
<p>In July, this bloated corporate criminal – MVP is under criminal investigation by the U. S. Attorney’s Office in Roanoke – sent out a crew to survey a portion of the pipeline route in West Virginia. Among other things, they were looking for endangered species.</p>
<p>The MVP surveyors were unable to do their work, however, because the pipeline route was too dangerous for them.</p>
<p>Dangerous, as in it was in imminent danger of a landslide.</p>
<p>In a July filing with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, MVP admitted:</p>
<p>“MVP attempted to conduct stream and wetland delineations, cultural resource, and rare, threatened, and endangered species surveys. Due to the instability of the slip, surveys were limited.”</p>
<p>MVP asked for permission to do “emergency slip remediation.”</p>
<p>MVP’s “emergency” request was dated July 11, but it was not actually filed with FERC until July 29.  That gives a sense of how seriously MVP takes the term “emergency.”</p>
<p>It is not clear what remediation work MVP did after its July 29 filing.  What is clear is that whatever work was done did not work.</p>
<p>Yesterday, ten days after filing its “emergency” request with FERC, MVP dropped a new bombshell.  An MVP attorney wrote FERC to provide “additional information” on MVP’s “slide repair” request:</p>
<p>“Due to the unstable nature of this slide, Mountain Valley is requesting emergency authorization from the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission to cut trees necessary to repair the slide.”</p>
<p>In this filing, MVP disclosed that the “slip” problem on this particular site actually had been going on for more than three months:</p>
<p>“This slide was identified on April 22, 2019 and was stabilized. Following a significant rain event on July 7, 2019, additional slide movement was observed on July 11, 2019.”</p>
<p>Three months after the initial landslide danger was noted, however, the problem has not been resolved.  In fact, it has gotten worse.</p>
<p>Much worse. In a chilling passage in yesterday’s letter, MVP made this stunning revelation:</p>
<p>“The progression of the slide caused additional area outside the limits of disturbance to destabilize, uprooted numerous large trees, has the potential to impact an aquatic resource, and has progressed to the point where a residence directly downslope is unsafe to be occupied. Mountain Valley Pipeline must stabilize the slide before it causes damage or injury to the landowners and resources located down-slope of the slide.”</p>
<p>That bears repeating.  MVP has made a residence “unsafe to be occupied.”  And something must be done to alleviate the danger of a landslide “before it causes damage or injury.”</p>
<p>Last week, we wrote that MVP’s main contractor, Precision Pipeline, has a history of killing its own workers.  One year ago, we wrote here and here, that Precision Pipeline has a terrifying record of causing landslides on its pipeline projects.  In fact, none other than Dominion Energy sued Precision Pipeline for having caused 50 landslides in a 55-mile pipeline project Precision built for Dominion.</p>
<p>Now it is beyond debate that MVP is endangering lives on this project.  MVP just admitted it.</p>
<p>How many more such slides exist along the 303-mile route of this pipeline?</p>
<p>It seems that no one in a position of power has been listening.</p>
<p>Until recently, that is, when Virginia Department of Environmental Quality Director David Paylor said he was “appalled” to find erosion and sediment control problems with MVP.  He was so appalled that he issued a stop work order for the MVP – along a two mile stretch of the route.</p>
<p>And now MVP is admitting that lives are in danger.  Not hypothetical danger, but the type of danger that requires “emergency” action.</p>
<p>As Tammy Belinsky, a Floyd County attorney involved in the fight to stop the Mountain Valley Pipeline, noted in reaction to MVP’s latest admission:</p>
<p>“They cut the trees off a slope that should have been known to have unstable soils.  Then MVP cut more trees down in a failed attempt to stabilize a slide.  Now MVP wants to cut more trees hoping for a different result.  Definition of insanity, no?”</p>
<p>MVP clearly is in a rush to complete this $5 billion corpore boondoggle, which already is years behind schedule.  With the Fourth Circuit repeatedly rejecting permits for the MVP and for the Atlantic Coast Pipeline, and with investors seemingly nervous about the overall health of the companies behind MVP, it is clear that MVP is willing to do whatever it takes, no matter the risk, to get this project done before someone shuts it down.</p>
<p>Which raises the question, are any state officials in Virginia (or West Virginia) paying attention?  What will it take to get the Department of Environmental Quality to shut MVP down?  What will it take for Virginia Attorney General Mark Herring, who already has accused MVP of having committed more than 300 violations of Virginia water laws and regulations, to advise his client, DEQ, to issue a stop work order along the entire route?</p>
<p>How many landslides is too many?  How many workers or landowners will have to be hurt? How many residences will have to be made “unsafe to be occupied.”</p>
<p>This is not complicated.  It’s an emergency.  Just ask MVP.</p>
<p><a href="https://bluevirginia.us/2019/08/definition-of-insanity-mountain-valley-pipeline-asks-for-emergency-authorization-to-prevent-a-life-threatening-landslide?fbclid=IwAR1ecIQdo8NQ_eAFMgV--3d9gXai7fEJYWb2IEQl7i9mmyywos3drWElEtY" rel="nofollow">https://bluevirginia.us/2019/08/definition-of-insanity-mountain-valley-pipeline-asks-for-emergency-authorization-to-prevent-a-life-threatening-landslide?fbclid=IwAR1ecIQdo8NQ_eAFMgV&#8211;3d9gXai7fEJYWb2IEQl7i9mmyywos3drWElEtY</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
