<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cancer Cases in Southwestern Pennsylvania Raising Important Questions With Few Answers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.frackcheckwv.net/2019/03/29/cancer-cases-in-southwestern-pennsylvania-raising-important-questions-with-few-answers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.frackcheckwv.net/2019/03/29/cancer-cases-in-southwestern-pennsylvania-raising-important-questions-with-few-answers/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress site</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Feb 2024 02:06:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: EHN Report</title>
		<link>https://www.frackcheckwv.net/2019/03/29/cancer-cases-in-southwestern-pennsylvania-raising-important-questions-with-few-answers/#comment-233122</link>
		<dc:creator>EHN Report</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Apr 2019 00:14:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frackcheckwv.net/?p=27581#comment-233122</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;More than 80 percent of waste from Pennsylvania’s oil and gas drilling stays in the state&lt;/strong&gt;

From Kristina Marusic, Environmental Health News, April 22, 2019

Exposure to oil and gas drilling waste has been linked to numerous health impacts, including cancer.

More than 80 percent of all waste from Pennsylvania&#039;s oil and gas drilling operations stays inside the state, according to a new study that tracked the disposal locations of liquid and solid waste from these operations over 26 years.

The study, published in the journal Science of the Total Environment, looked at waste from both conventional oil and gas drilling and fracking, or hydraulic fracturing, a process of extracting oil and gas from the Earth by drilling deep wells and injecting liquid at high pressure. This is the first comprehensive assessment of Pennsylvania&#039;s waste-disposal practices since the state began tracking waste disposal data in 1991, and it suggests that Pennsylvanian&#039;s aren&#039;t being adequately protected from potential health impacts associated with the industry&#039;s waste disposal practices.

&quot;Tracking waste across space—the distance and direction it travels and where it ends up—and across time helps us determine who is absorbing the potential health burdens associated with these waste products, both from recent operations and from legacy pollution across the lifetime of the state&#039;s oil and gas operations,&quot; said Lee Ann Hill, a researcher at Physicians, Scientists and Engineers for Healthy Energy (PSE) and lead author of the study, in a statement.

The study concluded that Pennsylvania residents are bearing more than 80 percent of that potential health burden. Living near fracking operations has been linked to preterm births, high-risk pregnancies, asthma, migraine headaches, fatigue, nasal and sinus symptoms, and skin disorders over the last 10 years.

Pennsylvania also has the third highest cancer incidence rate of all U.S. states. Approximately half of all Pennsylvanians will be diagnosed with cancer at some point in their lifetime, and about one in five Pennsylvanians will die of cancer.

Waste from both fracking and conventional oil and gas operations includes high-salinity water that can contain strontium and radium—both of which are classified as carcinogens—and solid waste like cuttings from drilling that bring naturally occurring radioactive materials like uranium, radium and thorium, up to the surface of the Earth from deep below.

In Southwestern Pennsylvania, most solid waste from oil and gas goes to landfills in the county where it was produced, while in northern counties along state borders solid waste is generally moved to neighboring states of Ohio and New York, according to the study.

The study found that solid waste mainly goes into landfills. Some of the state&#039;s liquid waste—7.6 percent, or 30 million barrels over 26 years—was sent to municipal or other water treatment plants, which discharged into surface waters like rivers after treatment.

Studies have shown that despite treatment, pollution remains in sediment downstream from release sites. For example, radium persists in sediment for many years and strontium, which accumulates in bones of living things, has been found in the shells of Allegheny River mussels downstream of treatment facilities.

More than half of the liquid waste from oil and gas operations that stays in Pennsylvania was reused in extraction operations, the study found. While recycling wastewater sounds good, the practice can result in more concentrated levels of salinity and chemical residues with each use.

The researchers noted this practice raises questions about how to treat or dispose of these more concentrated waste streams in the future.

The final location is unknown for more than a third of liquid waste from all oil and gas operations — 35 percent — often because reporting only lists intermediary locations for transfer or storage.

&quot;This finding illuminates what we don&#039;t know,&quot; Hill said.

The study also found that conventional oil and gas accounts for nearly a third of all waste generated by the industry in Pennsylvania. The researchers noted that legislation passed in 2016 strengthened disposal location tracking for fracking operations, but similar reporting practices weren&#039;t required for conventional operations.

&quot;We know that many of the hazards and risks associated with waste from oil and gas extraction exist for both conventional and unconventional operations,&quot; Hill said. &quot;From a public health perspective, it doesn&#039;t really make sense that conventional operators are held to a different standard.&quot;

The study concludes that a consistent, cradle-to-grave reporting system should be put in place so researchers can properly assess the risks posed to human health and the environment posed by waste from all types of oil and gas production.

https://www.ehn.org/more-than-80-percent-of-waste-from-pennsylvanias-oil-and-gas-drilling-stays-in-the-state-report-2635283061.html/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>More than 80 percent of waste from Pennsylvania’s oil and gas drilling stays in the state</strong></p>
<p>From Kristina Marusic, Environmental Health News, April 22, 2019</p>
<p>Exposure to oil and gas drilling waste has been linked to numerous health impacts, including cancer.</p>
<p>More than 80 percent of all waste from Pennsylvania&#8217;s oil and gas drilling operations stays inside the state, according to a new study that tracked the disposal locations of liquid and solid waste from these operations over 26 years.</p>
<p>The study, published in the journal Science of the Total Environment, looked at waste from both conventional oil and gas drilling and fracking, or hydraulic fracturing, a process of extracting oil and gas from the Earth by drilling deep wells and injecting liquid at high pressure. This is the first comprehensive assessment of Pennsylvania&#8217;s waste-disposal practices since the state began tracking waste disposal data in 1991, and it suggests that Pennsylvanian&#8217;s aren&#8217;t being adequately protected from potential health impacts associated with the industry&#8217;s waste disposal practices.</p>
<p>&#8220;Tracking waste across space—the distance and direction it travels and where it ends up—and across time helps us determine who is absorbing the potential health burdens associated with these waste products, both from recent operations and from legacy pollution across the lifetime of the state&#8217;s oil and gas operations,&#8221; said Lee Ann Hill, a researcher at Physicians, Scientists and Engineers for Healthy Energy (PSE) and lead author of the study, in a statement.</p>
<p>The study concluded that Pennsylvania residents are bearing more than 80 percent of that potential health burden. Living near fracking operations has been linked to preterm births, high-risk pregnancies, asthma, migraine headaches, fatigue, nasal and sinus symptoms, and skin disorders over the last 10 years.</p>
<p>Pennsylvania also has the third highest cancer incidence rate of all U.S. states. Approximately half of all Pennsylvanians will be diagnosed with cancer at some point in their lifetime, and about one in five Pennsylvanians will die of cancer.</p>
<p>Waste from both fracking and conventional oil and gas operations includes high-salinity water that can contain strontium and radium—both of which are classified as carcinogens—and solid waste like cuttings from drilling that bring naturally occurring radioactive materials like uranium, radium and thorium, up to the surface of the Earth from deep below.</p>
<p>In Southwestern Pennsylvania, most solid waste from oil and gas goes to landfills in the county where it was produced, while in northern counties along state borders solid waste is generally moved to neighboring states of Ohio and New York, according to the study.</p>
<p>The study found that solid waste mainly goes into landfills. Some of the state&#8217;s liquid waste—7.6 percent, or 30 million barrels over 26 years—was sent to municipal or other water treatment plants, which discharged into surface waters like rivers after treatment.</p>
<p>Studies have shown that despite treatment, pollution remains in sediment downstream from release sites. For example, radium persists in sediment for many years and strontium, which accumulates in bones of living things, has been found in the shells of Allegheny River mussels downstream of treatment facilities.</p>
<p>More than half of the liquid waste from oil and gas operations that stays in Pennsylvania was reused in extraction operations, the study found. While recycling wastewater sounds good, the practice can result in more concentrated levels of salinity and chemical residues with each use.</p>
<p>The researchers noted this practice raises questions about how to treat or dispose of these more concentrated waste streams in the future.</p>
<p>The final location is unknown for more than a third of liquid waste from all oil and gas operations — 35 percent — often because reporting only lists intermediary locations for transfer or storage.</p>
<p>&#8220;This finding illuminates what we don&#8217;t know,&#8221; Hill said.</p>
<p>The study also found that conventional oil and gas accounts for nearly a third of all waste generated by the industry in Pennsylvania. The researchers noted that legislation passed in 2016 strengthened disposal location tracking for fracking operations, but similar reporting practices weren&#8217;t required for conventional operations.</p>
<p>&#8220;We know that many of the hazards and risks associated with waste from oil and gas extraction exist for both conventional and unconventional operations,&#8221; Hill said. &#8220;From a public health perspective, it doesn&#8217;t really make sense that conventional operators are held to a different standard.&#8221;</p>
<p>The study concludes that a consistent, cradle-to-grave reporting system should be put in place so researchers can properly assess the risks posed to human health and the environment posed by waste from all types of oil and gas production.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.ehn.org/more-than-80-percent-of-waste-from-pennsylvanias-oil-and-gas-drilling-stays-in-the-state-report-2635283061.html/" rel="nofollow">https://www.ehn.org/more-than-80-percent-of-waste-from-pennsylvanias-oil-and-gas-drilling-stays-in-the-state-report-2635283061.html/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: StateImpact Penna.</title>
		<link>https://www.frackcheckwv.net/2019/03/29/cancer-cases-in-southwestern-pennsylvania-raising-important-questions-with-few-answers/#comment-233117</link>
		<dc:creator>StateImpact Penna.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Apr 2019 21:48:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frackcheckwv.net/?p=27581#comment-233117</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;PA State Reports: No cancer cluster in Washington County school district&lt;/strong&gt;

By Reid Frazier, StateImpact Penna., April 24, 2019
								 									 								
The Pennsylvania department of health has determined that there is no cancer cluster in a Washington County school district. The agency conducted the study after several cases of Ewing sarcoma, a rare bone cancer, were reported there.

The department looked at statistics from the Pennsylvania Cancer Registry dating to 1985. In addition to Ewing sarcoma, the agency looked at other types of cancer rates: liver, brain, bone, lung, and breast cancers. It compared cancer rates in Washington County and Canon-McMillan School District against statewide rates.

In a report released Tuesday, the state concluded that rates of Ewing sarcoma weren’t “consistently or statistically significantly higher than expected” in either Washington County or the school district.

The study did find that between 2005 and 2017, rates of Ewing sarcoma were three times higher than expected in the school district. The rare tumor mainly affects young people and can be fatal.

The authors said the number of cases was so small — just three instances of Ewing sarcoma in the district over those years — that the higher-than-expected rates weren’t “statistically significant.”

Only about 200 cases of the tumor are reported in the U.S. each year.

Jian-Min Yuan, a professor of epidemiology at Pitt’s Graduate School of Public Health, said the state used appropriate methods in analyzing whether the Washington County cases represented a cancer cluster or were a statistical anomaly.

He said the sample size of cases in the district was too small to determine whether there was a cancer cluster.

“It is unusual for this small area to have three Ewing cancers occur in a very short time period, but the scientific evidence does not support it yet,” Yuan said.

When the department announced it was performing the study, it said it would be looking into “possible environmental risk factors” for cancer in the area. The district includes a former radium and uranium plant in Canonsburg. It’s also in one of the busiest natural gas areas in the state, near more than a thousand shale gas wells and several compressor stations and other natural gas processing facilities.

The agency said it will continue to monitor the rate of pediatric cancers in the district as new data become available.

About StateImpact Pennsylvania

StateImpact Pennsylvania is a collaboration among WITF, WHYY, WESA, and The Allegheny Front. Reporters Marie Cusick, Reid Frazier, Susan Phillips, and Amy Sisk cover the commonwealth’s energy economy. Read their reports on this site, and hear them on public radio stations across Pennsylvania.

https://stateimpact.npr.org/pennsylvania/2019/04/24/state-no-cancer-cluster-in-washington-county-school-district/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>PA State Reports: No cancer cluster in Washington County school district</strong></p>
<p>By Reid Frazier, StateImpact Penna., April 24, 2019</p>
<p>The Pennsylvania department of health has determined that there is no cancer cluster in a Washington County school district. The agency conducted the study after several cases of Ewing sarcoma, a rare bone cancer, were reported there.</p>
<p>The department looked at statistics from the Pennsylvania Cancer Registry dating to 1985. In addition to Ewing sarcoma, the agency looked at other types of cancer rates: liver, brain, bone, lung, and breast cancers. It compared cancer rates in Washington County and Canon-McMillan School District against statewide rates.</p>
<p>In a report released Tuesday, the state concluded that rates of Ewing sarcoma weren’t “consistently or statistically significantly higher than expected” in either Washington County or the school district.</p>
<p>The study did find that between 2005 and 2017, rates of Ewing sarcoma were three times higher than expected in the school district. The rare tumor mainly affects young people and can be fatal.</p>
<p>The authors said the number of cases was so small — just three instances of Ewing sarcoma in the district over those years — that the higher-than-expected rates weren’t “statistically significant.”</p>
<p>Only about 200 cases of the tumor are reported in the U.S. each year.</p>
<p>Jian-Min Yuan, a professor of epidemiology at Pitt’s Graduate School of Public Health, said the state used appropriate methods in analyzing whether the Washington County cases represented a cancer cluster or were a statistical anomaly.</p>
<p>He said the sample size of cases in the district was too small to determine whether there was a cancer cluster.</p>
<p>“It is unusual for this small area to have three Ewing cancers occur in a very short time period, but the scientific evidence does not support it yet,” Yuan said.</p>
<p>When the department announced it was performing the study, it said it would be looking into “possible environmental risk factors” for cancer in the area. The district includes a former radium and uranium plant in Canonsburg. It’s also in one of the busiest natural gas areas in the state, near more than a thousand shale gas wells and several compressor stations and other natural gas processing facilities.</p>
<p>The agency said it will continue to monitor the rate of pediatric cancers in the district as new data become available.</p>
<p>About StateImpact Pennsylvania</p>
<p>StateImpact Pennsylvania is a collaboration among WITF, WHYY, WESA, and The Allegheny Front. Reporters Marie Cusick, Reid Frazier, Susan Phillips, and Amy Sisk cover the commonwealth’s energy economy. Read their reports on this site, and hear them on public radio stations across Pennsylvania.</p>
<p><a href="https://stateimpact.npr.org/pennsylvania/2019/04/24/state-no-cancer-cluster-in-washington-county-school-district/" rel="nofollow">https://stateimpact.npr.org/pennsylvania/2019/04/24/state-no-cancer-cluster-in-washington-county-school-district/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wikipedia</title>
		<link>https://www.frackcheckwv.net/2019/03/29/cancer-cases-in-southwestern-pennsylvania-raising-important-questions-with-few-answers/#comment-231655</link>
		<dc:creator>Wikipedia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Apr 2019 02:29:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frackcheckwv.net/?p=27581#comment-231655</guid>
		<description>From “Ewing Sarcoma” in Wikipedia .....

A grouping of three unrelated teenagers in Wake Forest, NC, have been diagnosed with Ewing&#039;s sarcoma. All three children were diagnosed in 2011 and all attended the same temporary classroom together while the school underwent renovation. A fourth teenager living nearby was diagnosed in 2009. The odds of this grouping are considered significant.[38]

Reference 38.  &quot;Three Wake students battle rare cancer: Cluster or coincidence?&quot;. WRAL.com. 29 April 2013. Archived from the original on 2013-05-01. Retrieved 2013-04-30.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From “Ewing Sarcoma” in Wikipedia &#8230;..</p>
<p>A grouping of three unrelated teenagers in Wake Forest, NC, have been diagnosed with Ewing&#8217;s sarcoma. All three children were diagnosed in 2011 and all attended the same temporary classroom together while the school underwent renovation. A fourth teenager living nearby was diagnosed in 2009. The odds of this grouping are considered significant.[38]</p>
<p>Reference 38.  &#8220;Three Wake students battle rare cancer: Cluster or coincidence?&#8221;. WRAL.com. 29 April 2013. Archived from the original on 2013-05-01. Retrieved 2013-04-30.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
