<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: US Fourth Circuit Issues Stay of Permit for MVP Stream Crossings in West Virginia</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.frackcheckwv.net/2018/06/25/fourth-circuit-issues-stay-of-permit-for-mvp-stream-crossings-in-west-virginia/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.frackcheckwv.net/2018/06/25/fourth-circuit-issues-stay-of-permit-for-mvp-stream-crossings-in-west-virginia/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress site</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Feb 2024 02:06:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Virginia Mercury News</title>
		<link>https://www.frackcheckwv.net/2018/06/25/fourth-circuit-issues-stay-of-permit-for-mvp-stream-crossings-in-west-virginia/#comment-219544</link>
		<dc:creator>Virginia Mercury News</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2018 15:06:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frackcheckwv.net/?p=24203#comment-219544</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Mountain Valley Pipeline (MVP) problems continue&lt;/strong&gt;

From the Virginia Mercury News, July 23, 2018

Regulators in West Virginia issued their sixth violation against the Mountain Valley Pipeline for allowing muddy runoff to flow from construction sites, reports Laurence Hammack at The Roanoke Times.

Opponents of the project, including a former DEQ regulator, called the repeated failures “pretty extraordinary,” according to the paper. The company has said it’s working to improve erosion controls.

Runoff can contaminate wells and other water supplies.

The Times also has a new photo gallery showing the progress of construction in Roanoke, Franklin and Montgomery counties.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Mountain Valley Pipeline (MVP) problems continue</strong></p>
<p>From the Virginia Mercury News, July 23, 2018</p>
<p>Regulators in West Virginia issued their sixth violation against the Mountain Valley Pipeline for allowing muddy runoff to flow from construction sites, reports Laurence Hammack at The Roanoke Times.</p>
<p>Opponents of the project, including a former DEQ regulator, called the repeated failures “pretty extraordinary,” according to the paper. The company has said it’s working to improve erosion controls.</p>
<p>Runoff can contaminate wells and other water supplies.</p>
<p>The Times also has a new photo gallery showing the progress of construction in Roanoke, Franklin and Montgomery counties.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cat McCue</title>
		<link>https://www.frackcheckwv.net/2018/06/25/fourth-circuit-issues-stay-of-permit-for-mvp-stream-crossings-in-west-virginia/#comment-218992</link>
		<dc:creator>Cat McCue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2018 16:15:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frackcheckwv.net/?p=24203#comment-218992</guid>
		<description>Hi all - 

The filing by Appalmad yesterday to stay MVP in Virginia mirrors the one filed in WV, and which the 4th Circuit ruled on our side last week. So… fingers crossed for the same result.

Go, Appalmad, go!  

https://www.roanoke.com/news/local/mountain-valley-pipeline-foes-file-new-legal-challenge-following-last/article_fa8b993f-57b3-5280-ac4c-d739eef0e341.html


https://www.wvgazettemail.com/news/cops_and_courts/mountain-valley-pipeline-construction-should-be-stopped-in-virginia-too/article_eb1c32d0-1856-5b80-85ce-362d513661ff.html

Cat McCue / Communications Director / Appalachian Voices
cat@appvoices.org / w. 434-293-6373 / c. 434-953-8672
Press releases &#124; Front Porch Blog &#124; The Appalachian Voice</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi all &#8211; </p>
<p>The filing by Appalmad yesterday to stay MVP in Virginia mirrors the one filed in WV, and which the 4th Circuit ruled on our side last week. So… fingers crossed for the same result.</p>
<p>Go, Appalmad, go!  </p>
<p><a href="https://www.roanoke.com/news/local/mountain-valley-pipeline-foes-file-new-legal-challenge-following-last/article_fa8b993f-57b3-5280-ac4c-d739eef0e341.html" rel="nofollow">https://www.roanoke.com/news/local/mountain-valley-pipeline-foes-file-new-legal-challenge-following-last/article_fa8b993f-57b3-5280-ac4c-d739eef0e341.html</a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.wvgazettemail.com/news/cops_and_courts/mountain-valley-pipeline-construction-should-be-stopped-in-virginia-too/article_eb1c32d0-1856-5b80-85ce-362d513661ff.html" rel="nofollow">https://www.wvgazettemail.com/news/cops_and_courts/mountain-valley-pipeline-construction-should-be-stopped-in-virginia-too/article_eb1c32d0-1856-5b80-85ce-362d513661ff.html</a></p>
<p>Cat McCue / Communications Director / Appalachian Voices<br />
<a href="mailto:cat@appvoices.org">cat@appvoices.org</a> / w. 434-293-6373 / c. 434-953-8672<br />
Press releases | Front Porch Blog | The Appalachian Voice</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WV Rivers</title>
		<link>https://www.frackcheckwv.net/2018/06/25/fourth-circuit-issues-stay-of-permit-for-mvp-stream-crossings-in-west-virginia/#comment-218988</link>
		<dc:creator>WV Rivers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2018 12:57:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frackcheckwv.net/?p=24203#comment-218988</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Federal Court Halts Mountain Valley Pipeline&lt;/strong&gt;

From the West Virginia Rivers Coalition, June 27, 2018

The news broke over the weekend that a federal court approved our motion to “stay”, or put a halt to, construction across 591 stream crossings by the Mountain Valley Pipeline (MVP) in West Virginia. This action is in response to a challenge filed by Appalachian Mountain Advocates on behalf of West Virginia Rivers, Sierra Club, Indian Creek Watershed Association, Appalachian Voices and the Chesapeake Climate Action Network to suspend an unlawful permit.

The permit, known as the Nationwide 12 administered by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, deals with dredge and fill approvals of rivers and streams crossings. Being a “nationwide” permit, it treats all crossings as “one size fits all” versus analyzing each crossing individually. The court’s ruling signals that MVP is ineligible for the Nationwide 12 permit. 

&lt;strong&gt;Five Facts on the Mountain Valley Pipeline Stream Crossing Stay&lt;/strong&gt;

Permit Ineligibility. The Fourth Circuit Court issued the stay because of issues related to the time MVP said it would take to complete river crossings. In our court challenge, we found that the MVP would not be in compliance with timeline requirements stipulated by the Nationwide 12 permit.

Four Rivers. Our challenge specifically pointed out the crossings of the Gauley, Elk, Greenbrier and Meadow Rivers. The Nationwide 12 requires these crossings be completed within 72-hours. However, we discovered that MVP says the crossings of these four rivers would take 4-6 weeks.

591 stream crossings. The court’s decision suspends any construction on 591 total streams in WV. Because the 4 rivers cannot meet the Nationwide 12 permit conditions, now the Nationwide 12 cannot be used for any of the crossings by this pipeline. MVP will likely need to apply for an individual permit for their stream crossings, a process that could take many months.

Violations. Just days before the court’s decision, WVDEP issued two water pollution violation notices for the Mountain Valley Pipeline. In all, MVP has been cited four times for failure to protect water quality.

Atlantic Coast Pipeline. The Mountain Valley Pipeline isn’t alone in its permit inadequacies. WV Rivers and partners sent a letter to the Army Corps of Engineers requesting a re-evaluation of the Atlantic Coast Pipeline’s Nationwide 12.

As this story continues to develop WV Rivers will keep you updated! Be sure to “like” WV Rivers on Facebook for breaking news and actions you can take to protect our water. 

West Virginia Rivers Coalition
3501 MacCorkle Ave SE #129
Charleston, WV 25304</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Federal Court Halts Mountain Valley Pipeline</strong></p>
<p>From the West Virginia Rivers Coalition, June 27, 2018</p>
<p>The news broke over the weekend that a federal court approved our motion to “stay”, or put a halt to, construction across 591 stream crossings by the Mountain Valley Pipeline (MVP) in West Virginia. This action is in response to a challenge filed by Appalachian Mountain Advocates on behalf of West Virginia Rivers, Sierra Club, Indian Creek Watershed Association, Appalachian Voices and the Chesapeake Climate Action Network to suspend an unlawful permit.</p>
<p>The permit, known as the Nationwide 12 administered by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, deals with dredge and fill approvals of rivers and streams crossings. Being a “nationwide” permit, it treats all crossings as “one size fits all” versus analyzing each crossing individually. The court’s ruling signals that MVP is ineligible for the Nationwide 12 permit. </p>
<p><strong>Five Facts on the Mountain Valley Pipeline Stream Crossing Stay</strong></p>
<p>Permit Ineligibility. The Fourth Circuit Court issued the stay because of issues related to the time MVP said it would take to complete river crossings. In our court challenge, we found that the MVP would not be in compliance with timeline requirements stipulated by the Nationwide 12 permit.</p>
<p>Four Rivers. Our challenge specifically pointed out the crossings of the Gauley, Elk, Greenbrier and Meadow Rivers. The Nationwide 12 requires these crossings be completed within 72-hours. However, we discovered that MVP says the crossings of these four rivers would take 4-6 weeks.</p>
<p>591 stream crossings. The court’s decision suspends any construction on 591 total streams in WV. Because the 4 rivers cannot meet the Nationwide 12 permit conditions, now the Nationwide 12 cannot be used for any of the crossings by this pipeline. MVP will likely need to apply for an individual permit for their stream crossings, a process that could take many months.</p>
<p>Violations. Just days before the court’s decision, WVDEP issued two water pollution violation notices for the Mountain Valley Pipeline. In all, MVP has been cited four times for failure to protect water quality.</p>
<p>Atlantic Coast Pipeline. The Mountain Valley Pipeline isn’t alone in its permit inadequacies. WV Rivers and partners sent a letter to the Army Corps of Engineers requesting a re-evaluation of the Atlantic Coast Pipeline’s Nationwide 12.</p>
<p>As this story continues to develop WV Rivers will keep you updated! Be sure to “like” WV Rivers on Facebook for breaking news and actions you can take to protect our water. </p>
<p>West Virginia Rivers Coalition<br />
3501 MacCorkle Ave SE #129<br />
Charleston, WV 25304</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
