<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: FERC Releases Draft Environmental Impact Statement for Mountain Valley Pipeline Project</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.frackcheckwv.net/2016/09/18/ferc-releases-draft-environmental-impact-statement-for-mountain-valley-pipeline-project/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.frackcheckwv.net/2016/09/18/ferc-releases-draft-environmental-impact-statement-for-mountain-valley-pipeline-project/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress site</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Feb 2024 02:06:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mary Wildfire</title>
		<link>https://www.frackcheckwv.net/2016/09/18/ferc-releases-draft-environmental-impact-statement-for-mountain-valley-pipeline-project/#comment-190324</link>
		<dc:creator>Mary Wildfire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2016 16:45:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frackcheckwv.net/?p=18274#comment-190324</guid>
		<description>People! 

You do not need to accept the one-on-one format! 

PA DEP. WV DEP. OSM, many agencies have tried to get away with this because the feeling that builds in a room as people give heartfelt and varied reasons for opposition, the networking that follows, are the only reason to even bother with public hearings--it&#039;s not like these agencies ever deny a permit. 

But I saw at one hearing long ago in Charleston, where OSM tried to do this, and Bill Price grabbed the mike and asked for &quot;a show of hands--who wants the usual, public format?&quot; Nearly every hand went up. 

&quot;Who wants the new format?&quot; The table with the coal industry guys all raised their hands. A clear majority for the public format, and it would have looked so anti-democratic to insist on the private approach that they gave it up.

Mary Wildfire, Spencer, WV</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>People! </p>
<p>You do not need to accept the one-on-one format! </p>
<p>PA DEP. WV DEP. OSM, many agencies have tried to get away with this because the feeling that builds in a room as people give heartfelt and varied reasons for opposition, the networking that follows, are the only reason to even bother with public hearings&#8211;it&#8217;s not like these agencies ever deny a permit. </p>
<p>But I saw at one hearing long ago in Charleston, where OSM tried to do this, and Bill Price grabbed the mike and asked for &#8220;a show of hands&#8211;who wants the usual, public format?&#8221; Nearly every hand went up. </p>
<p>&#8220;Who wants the new format?&#8221; The table with the coal industry guys all raised their hands. A clear majority for the public format, and it would have looked so anti-democratic to insist on the private approach that they gave it up.</p>
<p>Mary Wildfire, Spencer, WV</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
