<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ExxonMobil&#8217;s Smoke Screen &amp; Climate Change are Real</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.frackcheckwv.net/2016/06/27/exxonmobils-smoke-screen-climate-change-are-real/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.frackcheckwv.net/2016/06/27/exxonmobils-smoke-screen-climate-change-are-real/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress site</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Feb 2024 02:06:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reuters Update</title>
		<link>https://www.frackcheckwv.net/2016/06/27/exxonmobils-smoke-screen-climate-change-are-real/#comment-188745</link>
		<dc:creator>Reuters Update</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jun 2016 19:19:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frackcheckwv.net/?p=17665#comment-188745</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;U.S. states, Rockefellers clash with U.S. House panel on Exxon climate probes&lt;/strong&gt;

By Terry Wade,  HOUSTON, June 24, 2016

(Reuters) - With a number of U.S. states proceeding with investigations of Exxon Mobil Corp&#039;s (XOM.N) record on climate change, the attorney general of Massachusetts and investment funds of the Rockefeller family on Friday told a Congressional committee it lacked powers to oversee those probes.

The pushback is the latest chapter in a high-stakes fight between the world&#039;s largest publicly traded oil company and a coalition of state attorneys general who have said they would go after Exxon to try and force action to tackle climate change.

The House Committee on Science, Space and Technology last week reiterated demands that state attorneys general hand over any records of consultations the prosecutors had with outside environmental groups before their probes were opened.

Republicans on the committee have said about 20 state officials overreached when they jointly said in March they would participate in inquiries into whether Exxon executives misled the public by contradicting research from company scientists that spelled out the threats of climate change.

State officials have said the committee has no right to get involved.

&quot;The Committee lacks authority to interfere with an investigation by the Massachusetts Attorney General&#039;s Office into possible violations of Massachusetts law by ExxonMobil,&quot; said a letter to the committee from the office of Massachusetts Attorney General Maura Healey that was seen by Reuters.

In another letter to the House panel seen by Reuters, the Rockefeller Brothers Fund and the Rockefeller Family Fund, two investment funds that have been critical of fossil fuels linked to climate change, said the committee&#039;s request &quot;imperiled the funds&#039; First Amendment rights&quot; and said &quot;Congress&#039;s investigatory power is not unlimited.&quot;

Last week, Exxon asked a federal court to throw out a subpoena that would force it to hand over decades of documents on climate change to Healey&#039;s office.

Both sides in the standoff have sought to use the First Amendment of the Constitution, which guarantees freedom speech and freedom of assembly, among other protections, to press their cases.

The House committee has complained the inquiries risk stifling free speech and scientific inquiry, and that state officials were coordinating with special interest groups.

Exxon, which declined to comment on Friday, has repeatedly said that it has acknowledged the reality of climate change for years and communicated this to investors.

Source: http://mobile.reuters.com/article/idUSKCN0ZA3KX
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>U.S. states, Rockefellers clash with U.S. House panel on Exxon climate probes</strong></p>
<p>By Terry Wade,  HOUSTON, June 24, 2016</p>
<p>(Reuters) &#8211; With a number of U.S. states proceeding with investigations of Exxon Mobil Corp&#8217;s (XOM.N) record on climate change, the attorney general of Massachusetts and investment funds of the Rockefeller family on Friday told a Congressional committee it lacked powers to oversee those probes.</p>
<p>The pushback is the latest chapter in a high-stakes fight between the world&#8217;s largest publicly traded oil company and a coalition of state attorneys general who have said they would go after Exxon to try and force action to tackle climate change.</p>
<p>The House Committee on Science, Space and Technology last week reiterated demands that state attorneys general hand over any records of consultations the prosecutors had with outside environmental groups before their probes were opened.</p>
<p>Republicans on the committee have said about 20 state officials overreached when they jointly said in March they would participate in inquiries into whether Exxon executives misled the public by contradicting research from company scientists that spelled out the threats of climate change.</p>
<p>State officials have said the committee has no right to get involved.</p>
<p>&#8220;The Committee lacks authority to interfere with an investigation by the Massachusetts Attorney General&#8217;s Office into possible violations of Massachusetts law by ExxonMobil,&#8221; said a letter to the committee from the office of Massachusetts Attorney General Maura Healey that was seen by Reuters.</p>
<p>In another letter to the House panel seen by Reuters, the Rockefeller Brothers Fund and the Rockefeller Family Fund, two investment funds that have been critical of fossil fuels linked to climate change, said the committee&#8217;s request &#8220;imperiled the funds&#8217; First Amendment rights&#8221; and said &#8220;Congress&#8217;s investigatory power is not unlimited.&#8221;</p>
<p>Last week, Exxon asked a federal court to throw out a subpoena that would force it to hand over decades of documents on climate change to Healey&#8217;s office.</p>
<p>Both sides in the standoff have sought to use the First Amendment of the Constitution, which guarantees freedom speech and freedom of assembly, among other protections, to press their cases.</p>
<p>The House committee has complained the inquiries risk stifling free speech and scientific inquiry, and that state officials were coordinating with special interest groups.</p>
<p>Exxon, which declined to comment on Friday, has repeatedly said that it has acknowledged the reality of climate change for years and communicated this to investors.</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://mobile.reuters.com/article/idUSKCN0ZA3KX" rel="nofollow">http://mobile.reuters.com/article/idUSKCN0ZA3KX</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wikipedia</title>
		<link>https://www.frackcheckwv.net/2016/06/27/exxonmobils-smoke-screen-climate-change-are-real/#comment-188740</link>
		<dc:creator>Wikipedia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jun 2016 11:23:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frackcheckwv.net/?p=17665#comment-188740</guid>
		<description>Robert Charles Post was born in 1947. Post received his A.B. degree from Harvard in 1969 and earned his law degree from Yale in 1977. 

While at Yale, he served as an editor of the Yale Law Journal. He then clerked for D.C. Circuit Judge David Bazelon and Supreme Court Justice William J. Brennan, Jr. Post subsequently earned a Ph.D. in History of American Civilization from Harvard University, worked briefly in private practice, and started his career in law teaching at Berkeley Law in 1983. 

Post moved from Berkeley to Yale in 2003 and succeeded Harold Koh as Dean when Koh was appointed to serve as Legal Adviser to the U.S. State Department. Post has been quoted in the New York Times on the composition of the Supreme Court.

Post&#039;s academic interests include constitutional law, First Amendment, legal history, and affirmative action. His Citizens Divided (2014) looks at the constitutional aspects of electoral finance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Robert Charles Post was born in 1947. Post received his A.B. degree from Harvard in 1969 and earned his law degree from Yale in 1977. </p>
<p>While at Yale, he served as an editor of the Yale Law Journal. He then clerked for D.C. Circuit Judge David Bazelon and Supreme Court Justice William J. Brennan, Jr. Post subsequently earned a Ph.D. in History of American Civilization from Harvard University, worked briefly in private practice, and started his career in law teaching at Berkeley Law in 1983. </p>
<p>Post moved from Berkeley to Yale in 2003 and succeeded Harold Koh as Dean when Koh was appointed to serve as Legal Adviser to the U.S. State Department. Post has been quoted in the New York Times on the composition of the Supreme Court.</p>
<p>Post&#8217;s academic interests include constitutional law, First Amendment, legal history, and affirmative action. His Citizens Divided (2014) looks at the constitutional aspects of electoral finance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
