<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Penna. Landowners Object to Tree Cutting for Constitution Gas Pipeline</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.frackcheckwv.net/2016/02/01/pennsylvania-landowners-object-to-tree-cutting-for-constitution-gas-pipeline/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.frackcheckwv.net/2016/02/01/pennsylvania-landowners-object-to-tree-cutting-for-constitution-gas-pipeline/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress site</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Feb 2024 02:06:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: S. Thomas Bond</title>
		<link>https://www.frackcheckwv.net/2016/02/01/pennsylvania-landowners-object-to-tree-cutting-for-constitution-gas-pipeline/#comment-185679</link>
		<dc:creator>S. Thomas Bond</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2016 14:00:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frackcheckwv.net/?p=16600#comment-185679</guid>
		<description>Constitution Pipeline Company doubtless just sees trees.  Trees are all over the hillsides, there are about three trillion of them in the world, what&#039;s a few more or less? Why pay so much for trees, just because they have sweet sap?

Nothing is said about price in the article, but I&#039;d bet none of the people who work in rooms heated in winter and air-conditioned in summer buy their maple syrup thinking about trees and what it takes to get syrup out of the trees and into the bottle.  Or that the maple trees take decades to replace in the farmer&#039;s income.

These trees are not junk, they are standing capital in a productive industry.  The judge&#039;s duty is clear: no condemnation without just compensation.  Hollerans should be compensated for their capital, loss of income for an indefinite long time, extra work crossing the right of way and aesthetic loss.  

This is more externalized cost of the industry - cost of their initiative put off on someone else.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Constitution Pipeline Company doubtless just sees trees.  Trees are all over the hillsides, there are about three trillion of them in the world, what&#8217;s a few more or less? Why pay so much for trees, just because they have sweet sap?</p>
<p>Nothing is said about price in the article, but I&#8217;d bet none of the people who work in rooms heated in winter and air-conditioned in summer buy their maple syrup thinking about trees and what it takes to get syrup out of the trees and into the bottle.  Or that the maple trees take decades to replace in the farmer&#8217;s income.</p>
<p>These trees are not junk, they are standing capital in a productive industry.  The judge&#8217;s duty is clear: no condemnation without just compensation.  Hollerans should be compensated for their capital, loss of income for an indefinite long time, extra work crossing the right of way and aesthetic loss.  </p>
<p>This is more externalized cost of the industry &#8211; cost of their initiative put off on someone else.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Speaks ...</title>
		<link>https://www.frackcheckwv.net/2016/02/01/pennsylvania-landowners-object-to-tree-cutting-for-constitution-gas-pipeline/#comment-185649</link>
		<dc:creator>John Speaks ...</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2016 08:20:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frackcheckwv.net/?p=16600#comment-185649</guid>
		<description>Private property is private property. No eminent domain for private gain. 

The goons are out again. This is shameful. 

If a company wants property, let them buy it through direct negotiation with the landowner or homeowner. If they can&#039;t meet the price the property owner asks, then no deal. 

Any judge who rules in favor of eminent domain for private gain (and NO ....... pipelines are NOT a public service!) should be removed from the bench and lose any right, now and in the future, to ever occupy that or a similar position.

It is unconstitutional. Period.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Private property is private property. No eminent domain for private gain. </p>
<p>The goons are out again. This is shameful. </p>
<p>If a company wants property, let them buy it through direct negotiation with the landowner or homeowner. If they can&#8217;t meet the price the property owner asks, then no deal. </p>
<p>Any judge who rules in favor of eminent domain for private gain (and NO &#8230;&#8230;. pipelines are NOT a public service!) should be removed from the bench and lose any right, now and in the future, to ever occupy that or a similar position.</p>
<p>It is unconstitutional. Period.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
