Comments on: Fact or Fiction? Natural Gas is Another Fossil Fuel not a Viable Bridge to the Future https://www.frackcheckwv.net/2015/08/04/fact-or-fiction-natural-gas-is-another-fossil-fuel-not-a-viable-bridge-to-the-future/ Just another WordPress site Wed, 14 Feb 2024 02:06:39 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1 By: S. Thomas Bond https://www.frackcheckwv.net/2015/08/04/fact-or-fiction-natural-gas-is-another-fossil-fuel-not-a-viable-bridge-to-the-future/#comment-176308 S. Thomas Bond Thu, 06 Aug 2015 12:13:50 +0000 http://www.frackcheckwv.net/?p=15173#comment-176308 Thad Hill's statement is just what you would expect from a self-serving corporation, with no sense of the urgency about global warming. Profit now and profit forever. Let 'er rip. As for "Fact or Fiction?: Natural Gas Will Reduce Global Warming Pollution," it seems to avoid consideration of what the U. S. consumes that is manufactured abroad. The pollution is left there, but we are responsible. What is produced in China and India may cause worse pollution than if it was produced at home, because they are more reliant on coal. Not exporting gas will encourage renewables elsewhere. Thad Hill’s statement is just what you would expect from a self-serving corporation, with no sense of the urgency about global warming. Profit now and profit forever. Let ‘er rip.

As for “Fact or Fiction?: Natural Gas Will Reduce Global Warming Pollution,” it seems to avoid consideration of what the U. S. consumes that is manufactured abroad. The pollution is left there, but we are responsible. What is produced in China and India may cause worse pollution than if it was produced at home, because they are more reliant on coal. Not exporting gas will encourage renewables elsewhere.

]]>