<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Limiting Global Warming To 2 Degrees Is Now Too Much</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.frackcheckwv.net/2013/12/10/10363/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.frackcheckwv.net/2013/12/10/10363/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress site</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Feb 2024 02:06:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: R. B. Snyder</title>
		<link>https://www.frackcheckwv.net/2013/12/10/10363/#comment-43427</link>
		<dc:creator>R. B. Snyder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Dec 2013 21:59:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frackcheckwv.net/?p=10363#comment-43427</guid>
		<description>In the first decade of the 21st century, international panels of experts reviewed the evidence, and announced conclusions that were checked by virtually all the major national science academies, scientific societies, government science agencies and other bodies representative of scientific expertise. All these bodies agreed that the world faced a serious problem; all recommended that governments adopt strict policies to restrict greenhouse gas emissions. (All, that is, except a few self-appointed panels composed primarily of people with limited expertise in climate science, representing ideological and business interests that opposed all forms of government regulation.) Individual climate scientists, while almost unanimously in agreement with the consensus in its broad outlines, continued to argue vehemently over details, as always in frontier research. Critics pounced on every apparent discrepancy. They published long lists of scientists who denied there was any problem — although the lists included hardly any scientist who had made significant contributions to climate research. Debate over policies to restrict emissions grew increasingly intense.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the first decade of the 21st century, international panels of experts reviewed the evidence, and announced conclusions that were checked by virtually all the major national science academies, scientific societies, government science agencies and other bodies representative of scientific expertise. All these bodies agreed that the world faced a serious problem; all recommended that governments adopt strict policies to restrict greenhouse gas emissions. (All, that is, except a few self-appointed panels composed primarily of people with limited expertise in climate science, representing ideological and business interests that opposed all forms of government regulation.) Individual climate scientists, while almost unanimously in agreement with the consensus in its broad outlines, continued to argue vehemently over details, as always in frontier research. Critics pounced on every apparent discrepancy. They published long lists of scientists who denied there was any problem — although the lists included hardly any scientist who had made significant contributions to climate research. Debate over policies to restrict emissions grew increasingly intense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Get Smart on the Climate</title>
		<link>https://www.frackcheckwv.net/2013/12/10/10363/#comment-43343</link>
		<dc:creator>Get Smart on the Climate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Dec 2013 08:14:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frackcheckwv.net/?p=10363#comment-43343</guid>
		<description>Many greenhouse gases stay in the atmosphere for long periods of time. As a result, even if emissions stopped increasing, atmospheric greenhouse gas concentrations would continue to increase and remain elevated for hundreds of years. Moreover, if we stabilized concentrations and the composition of today&#039;s atmosphere remained steady (which would require a dramatic reduction in current greenhouse gas emissions), surface air temperatures would continue to warm. This is because the oceans, which store heat, take many decades to fully respond to higher greenhouse gas concentrations. The ocean&#039;s response to higher greenhouse gas concentrations and higher temperatures will continue to impact climate over the next several decades to hundreds of years.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Many greenhouse gases stay in the atmosphere for long periods of time. As a result, even if emissions stopped increasing, atmospheric greenhouse gas concentrations would continue to increase and remain elevated for hundreds of years. Moreover, if we stabilized concentrations and the composition of today&#8217;s atmosphere remained steady (which would require a dramatic reduction in current greenhouse gas emissions), surface air temperatures would continue to warm. This is because the oceans, which store heat, take many decades to fully respond to higher greenhouse gas concentrations. The ocean&#8217;s response to higher greenhouse gas concentrations and higher temperatures will continue to impact climate over the next several decades to hundreds of years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
