<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Social Cost of Carbon: Setting the Record Straight</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.frackcheckwv.net/2013/08/14/the-social-cost-of-carbon-setting-the-record-straight/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.frackcheckwv.net/2013/08/14/the-social-cost-of-carbon-setting-the-record-straight/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress site</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Feb 2024 02:06:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Patterson</title>
		<link>https://www.frackcheckwv.net/2013/08/14/the-social-cost-of-carbon-setting-the-record-straight/#comment-35727</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Patterson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Aug 2013 00:24:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frackcheckwv.net/?p=9071#comment-35727</guid>
		<description>The first three numbers are three estimates averaging costs from different scenarios and models, and differ, in order, by how much they discount “future costs and benefits” (5, 3, and 2.5 percent, respectively). The last number is the cost of emitting one ton of carbon dioxide under the worst five percent of all models. These different discount rates essentially reflect how much of the damage an emission today that causes damage to people in the future is actually reflected in the Social Cost of Carbon right now. If discount rates are confusing, read this excellent explanation of what they mean courtesy of David Roberts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The first three numbers are three estimates averaging costs from different scenarios and models, and differ, in order, by how much they discount “future costs and benefits” (5, 3, and 2.5 percent, respectively). The last number is the cost of emitting one ton of carbon dioxide under the worst five percent of all models. These different discount rates essentially reflect how much of the damage an emission today that causes damage to people in the future is actually reflected in the Social Cost of Carbon right now. If discount rates are confusing, read this excellent explanation of what they mean courtesy of David Roberts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Duane Nichols</title>
		<link>https://www.frackcheckwv.net/2013/08/14/the-social-cost-of-carbon-setting-the-record-straight/#comment-35537</link>
		<dc:creator>Duane Nichols</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Aug 2013 04:32:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frackcheckwv.net/?p=9071#comment-35537</guid>
		<description>The coal and oil industries are now active with lobbys in Congress against a &quot;social cost for carbon&quot; .  ..   ...

http://thehill.com/blogs/e2-wire/e2-wire/315631-social-cost-of-carbon-draws-coal-oil-industry-lobbying</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The coal and oil industries are now active with lobbys in Congress against a &#8220;social cost for carbon&#8221; .  ..   &#8230;</p>
<p><a href="http://thehill.com/blogs/e2-wire/e2-wire/315631-social-cost-of-carbon-draws-coal-oil-industry-lobbying" rel="nofollow">http://thehill.com/blogs/e2-wire/e2-wire/315631-social-cost-of-carbon-draws-coal-oil-industry-lobbying</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
