<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Shale Gas Development Abroad Hits Many Hurdles</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.frackcheckwv.net/2012/12/06/world-wide-shale-gas-development-in-transition/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.frackcheckwv.net/2012/12/06/world-wide-shale-gas-development-in-transition/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress site</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Feb 2024 02:06:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: S. Thomas Bond</title>
		<link>https://www.frackcheckwv.net/2012/12/06/world-wide-shale-gas-development-in-transition/#comment-14856</link>
		<dc:creator>S. Thomas Bond</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2012 19:38:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frackcheckwv.net/?p=6921#comment-14856</guid>
		<description>Reply to RD Blakeslee . . .

My posted article is a comment ON the WSJ article, not a rehash.  The phrase -- even relatively small towns have four or five story dwellings -- doesn&#039;t appear in the article, it&#039;s my observation.  

Thanks for supplying a better reference.   . . . Tom</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reply to RD Blakeslee . . .</p>
<p>My posted article is a comment ON the WSJ article, not a rehash.  The phrase &#8212; even relatively small towns have four or five story dwellings &#8212; doesn&#8217;t appear in the article, it&#8217;s my observation.  </p>
<p>Thanks for supplying a better reference.   . . . Tom</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RD Blakeslee</title>
		<link>https://www.frackcheckwv.net/2012/12/06/world-wide-shale-gas-development-in-transition/#comment-14845</link>
		<dc:creator>RD Blakeslee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2012 15:25:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frackcheckwv.net/?p=6921#comment-14845</guid>
		<description>The URL furnished to the WSJ article by FrackCheck&#039;s article requires membership in the WSJ&#039;s online edition to open.

Try this one: 
http://www.stockhouse.com/bullboards/messagedetail.aspx?p=0&amp;m=31856514&amp;s=cdh&amp;t=LIST&amp;l=0&amp;r=0

The FrackCheck characterization of the WSJ article is heavily slanted - it injects dogmatic, anti-drilling opinion not found in the WSJ article.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The URL furnished to the WSJ article by FrackCheck&#8217;s article requires membership in the WSJ&#8217;s online edition to open.</p>
<p>Try this one:<br />
<a href="http://www.stockhouse.com/bullboards/messagedetail.aspx?p=0&amp;m=31856514&amp;s=cdh&amp;t=LIST&amp;l=0&amp;r=0" rel="nofollow">http://www.stockhouse.com/bullboards/messagedetail.aspx?p=0&amp;m=31856514&amp;s=cdh&amp;t=LIST&amp;l=0&amp;r=0</a></p>
<p>The FrackCheck characterization of the WSJ article is heavily slanted &#8211; it injects dogmatic, anti-drilling opinion not found in the WSJ article.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
