<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8220;Marcellus at Your Door&#8221; in Doddridge County, WV</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.frackcheckwv.net/2012/10/05/marcellus-at-your-door-in-doddridge-county-wv/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.frackcheckwv.net/2012/10/05/marcellus-at-your-door-in-doddridge-county-wv/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress site</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Feb 2024 02:06:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>https://www.frackcheckwv.net/2012/10/05/marcellus-at-your-door-in-doddridge-county-wv/#comment-75272</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2014 02:46:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frackcheckwv.net/?p=6317#comment-75272</guid>
		<description>Navitus and its owner, Mark Smith, ended getting in trouble with the WV Engineering Board for the incompetent work they did in preparing that floodplain study, and Navitus admitted it did another study, this time more competently, that showed the flooding would have been more than a foot higher than the original incompetent study showed.

Here&#039;s a link to the WV Engineering Board&#039;s website. Click on case number 2013-05.  I think the important parts are in paragraph 9-12 (but I could be wrong as it&#039;s been awhile since I read it).

http://www.wvpebd.org/Home/WVEngineeringLaw/Enforcement/tabid/819/Default.aspx</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Navitus and its owner, Mark Smith, ended getting in trouble with the WV Engineering Board for the incompetent work they did in preparing that floodplain study, and Navitus admitted it did another study, this time more competently, that showed the flooding would have been more than a foot higher than the original incompetent study showed.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s a link to the WV Engineering Board&#8217;s website. Click on case number 2013-05.  I think the important parts are in paragraph 9-12 (but I could be wrong as it&#8217;s been awhile since I read it).</p>
<p><a href="http://www.wvpebd.org/Home/WVEngineeringLaw/Enforcement/tabid/819/Default.aspx" rel="nofollow">http://www.wvpebd.org/Home/WVEngineeringLaw/Enforcement/tabid/819/Default.aspx</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
