<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Also this week&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.frackcheckwv.net/2012/01/28/also-this-week/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.frackcheckwv.net/2012/01/28/also-this-week/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress site</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Feb 2024 02:06:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: RD Blakeslee</title>
		<link>https://www.frackcheckwv.net/2012/01/28/also-this-week/#comment-2273</link>
		<dc:creator>RD Blakeslee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2012 14:43:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frackcheckwv.net/?p=4045#comment-2273</guid>
		<description>&quot;The planet needs to direct efforts toward renewable, non carbon-based energy.  The talk of ‘clean natural gas’ and ‘bridge fuel’ is alluringly misleading.&quot;

&quot;Alluringly misleading&quot; is the implication that &quot;the planet&quot; can live today without bridge fuels and provide adequate amounts of energy from &quot;renewable non carbon-based&quot; sources. In the first place, all known technologies which don&#039;t burn fuel of some sort have adverse environmental impacts unique to each. Secondly, an all-out effort to deploy these technologies today would cause real hardship everywhere as we tried to live without adequate transportation, space heating, electrical appliances, etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The planet needs to direct efforts toward renewable, non carbon-based energy.  The talk of ‘clean natural gas’ and ‘bridge fuel’ is alluringly misleading.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;Alluringly misleading&#8221; is the implication that &#8220;the planet&#8221; can live today without bridge fuels and provide adequate amounts of energy from &#8220;renewable non carbon-based&#8221; sources. In the first place, all known technologies which don&#8217;t burn fuel of some sort have adverse environmental impacts unique to each. Secondly, an all-out effort to deploy these technologies today would cause real hardship everywhere as we tried to live without adequate transportation, space heating, electrical appliances, etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
